Cited by 1,955Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsTheoretical and Computational Physics

Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories

Cardy, John L.·1986·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90552-3

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardy, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Cardy, John L.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-01
Volume
270
Pages
186-204
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023953089
Cited by
1,955
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 45
FWCI
61.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
conformal invariance, operator content, transfer matrix, critical systems, finite-width strip, trace anomaly, central charge, unitary conformal field theory, primary operators, sum rules, scaling dimensions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review