Cited by 764Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Soft Hair on Black Holes

Open access
Hawking, Stephen W., Perry, Malcolm J., Strominger, Andrew·2016·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

It has recently been shown that Bondi-van der Burg-Metzner-Sachs supertranslation symmetries imply an infinite number of conservation laws for all gravitational theories in asymptotically Minkowskian spacetimes. These laws require black holes to carry a large amount of soft (i.e., zero-energy) supertranslation hair. The presence of a Maxwell field similarly implies soft electric hair. This Letter gives an explicit description of soft hair in terms of soft gravitons or photons on the black hole horizon, and shows that complete information about their quantum state is stored on a holographic plate at the future boundary of the horizon. Charge conservation is used to give an infinite number of exact relations between the evaporation products of black holes which have different soft hair but are otherwise identical. It is further argued that soft hair which is spatially localized to much less than a Planck length cannot be excited in a physically realizable process, giving an effective number of soft degrees of freedom proportional to the horizon area in Planck units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.116.231301

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One key aspect of this class of models is to give prominence to hair degrees of freedom on the horizon which are approximately conserved (non-)gravitational charges.

    “One key aspect of this class of models is to give prominence to hair degrees of freedom on the horizon which are essentially (approximately) conserved (non-)gravitational charges”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawking, S. W., Perry, M. J., & Strominger, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2016-06-06
Volume
116
Issue
23
Pages
231301-231301
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2225733786
Cited by
764
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 1
FWCI
54.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • National Science Foundation (1205550)
  • Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
soft hair, black holes, soft gravitons, soft photons, holographic plates, black hole evaporation, charge conservation, horizon area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review