Cited by 65Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Black Hole Information Revisited

Open access
Strominger, Andrew·2019·Jacob Bekenstein

Abstract

We argue that four-dimensional black hole evaporation inevitably produces an infinite number of soft particles in addition to the thermally distributed `hard' Hawking quanta, and moreover that the soft and hard particles are highly correlated. This raises the possibility that quantum purity is restored by correlations between the hard and soft radiation, while inclusive measurements which omit the soft radiation observe the thermal Hawking spectrum. In theories whose only stable particle is the graviton, conservation laws are used to argue that such correlations are in principle sufficient for the soft gravitons to purify the hard thermal ones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789811203961_0010

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One key aspect of this class of models is to give prominence to hair degrees of freedom on the horizon which are approximately conserved (non-)gravitational charges.

    “One key aspect of this class of models is to give prominence to hair degrees of freedom on the horizon which are essentially (approximately) conserved (non-)gravitational charges”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strominger, A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Strominger, Andrew
Venue
Jacob Bekenstein
Published
2019-09-17
Pages
109-117
OpenAlex
W2696445246
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
FWCI
46.91
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1205550)
  • John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
black hole information paradox, black holes, quantum information, Hawking radiation, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review