The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental X-Ray Ghost Imaging
Open accessAbstract
We report an experimental proof of principle for ghost imaging in the hard-x-ray energy range. We use a synchrotron x-ray beam that is split using a thin crystal in Laue diffraction geometry. With an ultrafast imaging camera, we are able to image x rays generated by isolated electron bunches. At this time scale, the shot noise of the synchrotron emission process is measurable as speckles, leading to speckle correlation between the two beams. The integrated transmitted intensity from a sample located in the first beam is correlated with the spatially resolved intensity measured in the second, empty, beam to retrieve the shadow of the sample. The demonstration of ghost imaging with hard x rays may open the way to protocols to reduce radiation damage in medical imaging and in nondestructive structural characterization using free electron lasers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light
BROWN, R. H., & TWISS, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177027a0 · Cited by 2,573
Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement
Pittman, T. B., Shih, Y. H., Strekalov, D. V., & Sergienko, A. V. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r3429 · Cited by 2,142
Shapiro, J. H. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.061802 · Cited by 1,531
“Two-Photon” Coincidence Imaging with a Classical Source
Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.113601 · Cited by 1,113
Bonse, U., & Hart, M. (1965) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1754212 · Cited by 1,057
Katz, O., Bromberg, Y., & Silberberg, Y. (2009) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3238296 · Cited by 1,018
Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation
Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M., & Lugiato, L. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602 · Cited by 930
Two-Photon Imaging with Thermal Light
Valencia, A., Scarcelli, G., D’Angelo, M., & Shih, Y. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.063601 · Cited by 838
Ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational
Erkmen, B. I., & Shapiro, J. H. (2010) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.2.000405 · Cited by 483
Yabashi, M., Tamasaku, K., & Ishikawa, T. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.140801 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics
Young, L., Ueda, K., Gühr, M., Bucksbaum, P. H., Simon, M., Mukamel, S., Rohringer, N., Prince, K. C., Masciovecchio, C., Meyer, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aa9735 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelliccia, D., Rack, A., Scheel, M., Cantelli, V., & Paganin, D. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-09-07
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 113902-113902
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2404011284
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental X-Ray Ghost Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.117.113902
- The paper
- Pelliccia, D., Rack, A., Scheel, M., Cantelli, V., & Paganin, D. M. (2016). Experimental X-Ray Ghost Imaging. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.113902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
