The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational ghost imaging
Open accessAbstract
Ghost-imaging experiments correlate the outputs from two photodetectors: a high spatial-resolution (scanning pinhole or charge-coupled-device camera) detector that measures a field which has not interacted with the object to be imaged and a bucket (single-pixel) detector that collects a field that has interacted with the object. We describe a computational ghost-imaging arrangement that uses only a single-pixel detector. This configuration affords background-free imagery in the narrow-band limit and a three-dimensional sectioning capability. It clearly indicates the classical nature of ghost-image formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356
Cited by
Experimental X-Ray Ghost Imaging
Pelliccia, D., Rack, A., Scheel, M., Cantelli, V., & Paganin, D. M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.113902 · Cited by 367
Simultaneous real-time visible and infrared video with single-pixel detectors
Edgar, M. P., Gibson, G. M., Bowman, R. W., Sun, B., Radwell, N., Mitchell, K. J., Welsh, S. S., & Padgett, M. J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10669 · Cited by 332
An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical
Padgett, M. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0233 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, J. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-12-18
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- IThK7-IThK7
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1560002780
- Cited by
- 1,531
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational ghost imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.78.061802
- The paper
- Shapiro, J. H. (2008). Computational ghost imaging. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.78.061802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
