Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 930

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation

Open access
Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M., Lugiato, L. A.·2004·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We consider a scheme for coherent imaging that exploits the classical correlation of two beams obtained by splitting incoherent thermal radiation. This case is analyzed in parallel with the configuration based on two entangled beams produced by parametric down-conversion, and a precise formal analogy is pointed out. This analogy opens the possibility of using classical beams from thermal radiation for ghost imaging schemes in the same way as entangled beams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 930

Metadata

Authors
Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M., & Lugiato, L. A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2004-08-26
Volume
93
Issue
9
Pages
093602-093602
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602
OpenAlex
W2038740356
Cited by
930
References
2
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602
The paper
Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M., & Lugiato, L. A. (2004). Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.