The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
12-Photon Entanglement and Scalable Scattershot Boson Sampling with Optimal Entangled-Photon Pairs from Parametric Down-Conversion
Open accessAbstract
Entangled-photon sources with simultaneously near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are the fundamental elements for scalable photonic quantum technologies. We design and realize a degenerate telecommunication wavelength entangled-photon source from an ultrafast pulsed laser pumped spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC), which shows simultaneously 97% heralding efficiency and 96% indistinguishability between independent single photons without narrow-band filtering. Such a beamlike and frequency-uncorrelated SPDC source allows generation of the first 12-photon genuine entanglement with a state fidelity of 0.572±0.024. We further demonstrate a blueprint of scalable scattershot boson sampling using 12 SPDC sources and a 12×12 mode interferometer for three-, four-, and five-boson sampling, which yields count rates more than 4 orders of magnitude higher than all previous SPDC experiments.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reports an optimized ultrafast-pumped SPDC entangled-photon source with simultaneously near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability, enabling the first 12-photon genuine entanglement and a scalable scattershot boson sampling blueprint. Using 12 SPDC sources and a 12×12-mode interferometer, it demonstrates three-, four-, and five-boson sampling with multi-photon count rates more than four orders of magnitude higher than previous SPDC experiments.
Key findings
- The source achieved ~97% corrected heralding efficiency and ~96% indistinguishability between independent single photons; Hong-Ou-Mandel interference showed a raw visibility of 0.962 ± 0.011, spectral purity was 0.99, and Bell-state visibility was above 0.997.
- The first 12-photon genuine entanglement was generated with population P = 0.732 ± 0.024, coherence C = 0.419 ± 0.041, and state fidelity reported as 0.572 ± 0.024 in the abstract (0.576 ± 0.024 in the main text), exceeding the 0.5 threshold by more than 3 standard deviations.
- Scattershot boson sampling with 12 SPDC sources and a 12×12-mode interferometer measured three-, four-, and five-photon sampling rates of 3.9 kHz, 44 Hz, and 0.3 Hz, respectively; the 3-boson sampling gave similarity 0.982 ± 0.004 and distance 0.122 ± 0.018.
- The 3.9 kHz three-photon count rate is more than four orders of magnitude higher than the best previous SPDC-based boson sampling experiments and comparable to state-of-the-art quantum-dot single-photon work.
Methods
- The entangled-photon source used beam-like type-II SPDC in a 6.3-mm BBO crystal pumped by a 775-nm pulsed laser with 5.5-nm bandwidth and 80-MHz repetition, generating photon pairs around 1550 nm; YVO4 beam displacers, half-wave plates, dispersion-compensating prisms, 30-nm bandpass filters, and superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with ~75% average efficiency were used.
- For 12-photon entanglement, six BBO crystals produced six entangled pairs; one photon from each pair was combined on five polarization beam splitters, and 12-photon coincidences were post-selected and measured with wave plates, PBSs, and 24 SNSPDs at 1.8 W pump power and 0.55-mm focal waist, giving a 2.0 MHz two-photon rate and about one 12-photon coincidence per hour.
- For scattershot boson sampling, 12 SPDC sources fed a 12×12-mode interferometer encoded in spatial and polarization modes; idler photons heralded signal photons, and the experiment used a 0.8-mm pump waist and 0.5 MHz two-photon count rate, with similarity/distance metrics and likelihood ratio tests against a distinguishable-photon hypothesis.
Limitations
- The paper states that scaling to larger photon numbers is prohibited by the intrinsically probabilistic generation of entangled photon pairs in SPDC, which would require multiplexing.
- The paper states that similarity/distance characterization is not scalable to larger photon numbers; for four- and five-boson sampling the input-output combinations reach 495×495 and 792×792, making counting events extremely scarce, so a likelihood ratio test was used instead.
- The paper notes that the slight deviation of the measured HOM visibility from the predicted 0.99 could be caused by residual dispersion of the pump laser; the text also makes evident that the 12-photon coincidence rate was about one per hour and the five-boson sampling rate was 0.3 Hz.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
19 Own result · 11 Sources not found · 6 No basis given · 5 Own interpretation · 1 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and comparable to the work using state-of-the-art quantum-dot single photons”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This high-performance entangled photon source immediately makes it possible to perform the first 12-photon entanglement experiment.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Such a highefficiency and frequency-uncorrelated SPDC source allows generation of the first 12-photon genuine entanglement”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The lack of a perfect entangled-photon source is the main reason scalable multi-photon entanglement remained challenging.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From Fig. 3b, we calculate 0.419 0.041 C .”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From Fig. 3a, we extract the population 0.732 0.024 P .”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which exceeds the threshold 0.5 more than 3 standard deviations”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We design and realize a degenerate entangled-photon source from an ultrafast pulsed laser pumped spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC), which show simultaneously ~97% heralding efficiency and ~96% indistinguishability between independent single photons.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Here, we design and experimentally realize an optimal SPDC source of entangled photons at telecommunication wavelength by combining the techniques of frequencyuncorrelated and beam-like SPDC.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are fundamental requirements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At a pump beam waist of 1.9 mm, the brightness decreases to 170 Hz/mW whereas the heralding efficiency increases to 94%.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the measured 3.9 kHz three-photon count rate is more than 4 orders of magnitudes higher than the best previous boson sampling experiments based on SPDC [26][27][28][29]50]”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [26][27][28][29]50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“at zero delay the four-fold coincidence count shows a dip with a raw visibility of 0.962 0.011 , without using inefficient narrowband spectral filtering.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtracting the channel loss in the optical path from the BBO to the single-mode fiber, we estimate a corrected heralding efficiency of 97% at 1.9-mm waist.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 6
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We measure the three-, four-and five-photon sampling rate of 3.9 kHz, 44 Hz and 0.3 Hz, respectively.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“at a pump beam waist of 260 μm, we obtain a two-photon count rate of 7100 Hz/mW and a heralding efficiency of 85%.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we obtain a similarity of 0.982 0.004 and a distance of 0.122 0.018 .”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“using a BBO crystal with a thickness of 6.3 mm, pump laser wavelength of 775 nm (generating photon pairs centered around 1550 nm), and pulsed laser bandwidth of 5.5 nm [46].”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are 220, 495 and 792 different no-collision input combinations for the three-, four-and fivephoton boson sampling, which implies that our scattershot boson sampling is expected to yield 220, 495 and 792 times enhancement of the efficiency over standard boson sampling, respectively.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In the past two decades, the number of genuinely multi-particle entangled photons from SPDC has been increased up to ten [15,16].”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“opening up a promising pathway to scalable photonic quantum technologies.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: Near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are fundamental requirements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to the group delay dispersion of the YVO4 crystals (310 fs 2 /mm) and the BBO crystals (79 fs 2 /mm), we employ four pairs of dispersion-compensating prisms to eliminate the dispersion.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our SPDC source is also readily to be combined with multiplexing to overcome its probabilistic scaling, opening up a new pathway towards scalable photonic quantum technologies.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are fundamental requirements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
In the paper
“Spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) [1] has been the most widely used workhorse for producing entangled-photon pairs”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our work immediately enables high-efficiency implementations of multiplexing, scattershot boson sampling, and heralded creation of remotely entangled photons”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are fundamental requirements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are fundamental requirements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
“Entangled photon sources with simultaneously near-unity heralding efficiency and indistinguishability are the fundamental elements for scalable photonic quantum technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The lack of a perfect entangled-photon source is the main reason scalable multi-photon entanglement remained challenging.
“Yet, a more scalable implementation remained challenging, largely to the lack of a perfect entangled-photon source produced by ultrafast laser pumped SPDC where the photonic entanglement fidelity, the collection efficiency, and the indistinguishability between independent photons are simultaneously engineered to close to unity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simultaneous combination of near-unity entanglement fidelity, indistinguishability, and collection efficiency remained an outstanding goal before this work.
“There has been important progress in preparing heralded single photons in frequencyuncorrelated pure quantum state [42][43][44], yet the simultaneous combination of nearunity entanglement fidelity, indistinguishability, and collection efficiency remained an outstanding goal.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While photonic experiments in bulk-optics continue to deliver significant results [15], large-scale quantum information processing with hundreds or thousands of photons will almost certainly require the technological functionalities and scaling that only integrated photonics can provide.”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated first on chip via bulk-optic SPDC-SPSs [15, 97] ( Fig.5a ), and recently via a fully integrated chip via SFWM-SPSs [98].”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > Abstract
“we perform a Hong-Ou-Mandel quantum interference [47] between two independent SPDC photons.”
§ 2-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion > References
“46. C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987). 47. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Physics Reports 474, 1 (2009).”
Citations
Cites
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545
Self-citationMeasurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401
Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution
Liao, S.-K., Cai, W.-Q., Liu, W.-Y., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Ren, J.-G., Yin, J., Shen, Q., Cao, Y., Li, Z.-P., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23655 · Cited by 1,821
Self-citationViolation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5039 · Cited by 1,643
Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 · Cited by 1,537
Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons
Giustina, M., Versteegh, M. A. M., Wengerowsky, S., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Phelan, K., Steinlechner, F., Kofler, J., Larsson, J.-Å., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250401 · Cited by 1,529
Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733 · Cited by 1,514
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.4086/toc.2013.v009a004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 432
High-Precision Voltage Measurement for Optical Quantum Computation
Wereszczyński, K., Michalczuk, A., Paszkuta, M., & Gumiela, J. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15124205 · Cited by 4
Solntsev, A. S., Batalov, S., Langford, N. K., & Sukhorukov, A. A. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac7348 · Cited by 4
Lewis, A. M., & Scudo, P. F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06762 · Cited by 4
Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom
Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O., & Rempe, G. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04987-5 · Cited by 3
Narrow-Band Entangled Photon-Pair Source for a Quantum Repeater Based on Solid-State Quantum Memory
Turaykhanov, D. A., Зиннурович, Л. И., Shkalikov, A. V., & Калачев, А. А. (2024) · Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11141-025-10355-w · Cited by 3
Multiphoton, multimode state classification for nonlinear optical circuits
Kopylov, D. A., Offen, C., Ares, L., Wembe, B., Ober‐Blöbaum, S., Meier, T., Sharapova, P. R., & Sperling, J. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/sv6z-v1gk · Cited by 3
Experimental Quantum Electronic Voting
Laurent-Puig, N., Baroni, M., Centrone, F., & Diamanti, E. (2026) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1103/scjl-5ygh · Cited by 3
Indistinguishable Photons from a Two-Photon Cascade
Anonymous, Salusti, F., Hogg, M., Marczak, M., Heinisch, N., Valentin, S. R., Schumacher, S., Ludwig, A., Jöns, K. D., & Warburton, R. J. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/t8sk-b2w4 · Cited by 3
Compact Greenberger—Horne—Zeilinger state generation via frequency combs and graph theory
Gu, X., & Krenn, M. (2020) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-020-1028-7 · Cited by 3
Arlt, S., Ruiz-Gonzalez, C., & Krenn, M. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad904f · Cited by 3
Robust entangled state transmission and preparation in a trimer-like chain
Zheng, L.-N., Wang, H., & Yi, X. X. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2024.12.009 · Cited by 3
Vapor-cavity-QED system for quantum computation and communication
Austin, S., Devulapalli, D., Hoang, K. T., Zhou, F., Srinivasan, K. A., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/fbz4-s3by · Cited by 3
Kiyohara, T., Okamoto, R., & Takeuchi, S. (2020) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.393584 · Cited by 3
Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of entangled photons generated under pump-tight-focusing condition
Tian, Y., Cai, W., Yang, Z.-X., Chen, F., Jin, R., & Zhou, Q. (2022) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211783 · Cited by 3
Measurement-device-independent nonlinear entanglement witnesses
Sen, K., Srivastava, C., & Sen, U. (2023) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ace4a5 · Cited by 3
Bursts of polarised single photons from atom-cavity sources
Ernst, J. O., Álvarez, J.-R., Barrett, T. D., & Kuhn, A. (2023) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/acf9d2 · Cited by 3
Resource-efficient low-loss four-channel active demultiplexer for single photons
Dryazgov, M., Biriukov, Y. A., Dyakonov, I. V., Taratorin, K. V., Korneev, A., Rakhlin, M. V., Galimov, A., Klimko, G. V., Sorokin, S., Kulagina, M. M., et al. (2023) · Optica Quantum · doi:10.1364/opticaq.494449 · Cited by 3
Zhifeng, 刘. L., Shuangyin, 黄. H., Chao, 陈. C., Zhicheng, 任. R., Xilin, 汪. W., & Huitian, 王. W. (2024) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos231992 · Cited by 3
Unveiling vacuum fluctuations and nonclassical states with cavity-enhanced tripartite interactions
Tang, J., & Deng, Y. (2024) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0210936 · Cited by 3
Bayesian optimization of non-classical optomechanical correlations
Pitchford, A., Rakhubovsky, A. A., Mukherjee, R., Moore, D. W., Sauvage, F., Burgarth, D. K., Filip, R., & Mintert, F. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad7169 · Cited by 3
Krenn-Gu Conjecture for Sparse GraphsPreprint
Chandran, L. S., Gajjala, R. R., & Illickan, A. M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.mfcs.2024.41 · Cited by 3
Mohammed, M. J., Saleh, M. B., & Al-Baidhany, I. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1999/1/012076 · Cited by 2
Meng, F., Zhu, H., Huang, X., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052431 · Cited by 2
Implementation of multiparticle quantum speed limits on observables
Miao, R.-H., Liu, Z.-D., Ning, C.-X., Hu, Y.-C., Zhang, H., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ady0497 · Cited by 2
Self-citationExperimental Quantum Channel Purification
Fei, Y.-Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, R., Cai, Z., Yin, X.-F., Mao, Y., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Chen, Y.-A., & Pan, J.-W. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/t8qx-hvz7 · Cited by 2
Self-citationHartnett, G. S., Kielpinski, D., Maity, S., Mundada, P., Baum, Y., & Hush, M. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/c4v4-wz65 · Cited by 2
Increasing entanglement concentration and the role of measurement imaginarity
Biswas, I., Bera, S., Sen, U., Chattopadhyay, I., & Sarkar, D. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/jld4-y6q5 · Cited by 2
Huang, X., Niu, L., Chen, J., Li, L., Hayat, K., & Liu, W. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2024.2365907 · Cited by 2
Self-citationThree-photon polarization entanglement of green light
Lou, Y.-C., Ren, Z., Chen, C., Wan, P., Zhu, W.-Z., Wang, J., Xue, S.-T., Dong, B.-W., Ding, J., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.014052 · Cited by 2
Self-citationIntegrated photonic quantum computing
Zhang, Y. Y. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91765-0.00008-6 · Cited by 2
Birefringent Spin‐Photon Interface Generates Polarization Entanglement
Leppenen, N. V., & Smirnov, D. S. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400193 · Cited by 2
Assisted cloning of an unknown shared quantum state
Zhai, D., Jia-yin, P., Maihemuti, N., & Tang, J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305718 · Cited by 2
Entanglement, quantum steering, and Bell nonlocality in the Tavis–Cummings system
Ye, B. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2024.09.040 · Cited by 2
Bosonic entanglement and quantum sensing from energy transfer in two-tone Floquet systems
Chen, Y. J., Elben, A., Rubio, Á., & Refael, G. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/cm49-smhr · Cited by 2
Self-citationMonitoring the generation of photonic linear cluster states with partial measurements
Guichard, V., Vidro, L., Fioretto, D., Steindl, P., Istrati, D., Pilnyak, Y., Pont, M., Morassi, M., Lemaître, A., Sagnes, I., et al. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae21ff · Cited by 2
Measuring the refractive index of optical adhesives at cryogenic temperatures
Hou, X., Yao, N., You, L., Li, H., Fang, W., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Tong, L., & Xie, X. (2020) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.386265 · Cited by 2
Self-citationBasics and applications of optical interferometers integrated by femtosecond laser
Zhang, J.-W., & Sugioka, K. (2022) · Applied Research · doi:10.1002/appl.202200002 · Cited by 2
Cao, J., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Feng, T., Li, Z., Xing, Z., Li, H., & Zhou, X. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac8737 · Cited by 2
Self-citationZhai, M., Wen, F., Zhang, S., Ye, H., Hui, S., Liang, Y., Zeng, J., Yang, T., Zhong, D., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300457 · Cited by 1
Boson sampling validation approach by examining the sample space filling
Mazanik, A. A., & Rubtsov, A. N. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/s467-pqyf · Cited by 1
Hosseiny, S. M., Khabisi, A. P., Seyed‐Yazdi, J., & Norouzi, M. (2025) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-025-06145-9 · Cited by 1
Hao, 占. Z., Liang, 胥. X., & Lijian, 张. Z. (2025) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos251405 · Cited by 1
Boosting Gaussian boson sampling using optical parametric amplification networks
Zhao, Y., Xu, X.-Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/dcfq-1byk · Cited by 1
Exchange symmetry in multiphoton quantum interference
Kumar, S., Jones, A. E., Bhatti, D., & Barz, S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/4thx-c9s7 · Cited by 1
Entangled Photon Triplets Using Lithium Niobate Nanophotonics
Harper, N., Sengupta, A., Hwang, E., & Cushing, S. K. (2026) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6c00823 · Cited by 1
Lo, H.-P., Asaoka, K., & Takesue, H. (2026) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ae35f7 · Cited by 1
Tailoring Spatial Correlations With Quantum Interference
Schiano, C., Sephton, B., Darsheshdar, E., Marrucci, L., de Lisio, C., & D’Ambrosio, V. (2026) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202502895 · Cited by 1
Sevilla-Gutiérrez, C., Kaipalath, V. R., & Steinlechner, F. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/y39c-63q7 · Cited by 1
Quantum dots for entanglement-based quantum key distribution
Basset, F. B., & Trotta, R. (2026) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0293657 · Cited by 1
Peng, L.-C., Wu, D., Li, Y., Gu, X., Qin, J., Xu, K., Zhong, H.-S., Wang, H., He, Y.-M., Chen, M.-C., et al. (2026) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03348-7 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBeyond quantum linear optics with adaptive boson sampling
Rodari, G., Francalanci, T., Caruccio, E., Hoch, F., Milani, G., Carvacho, G., Giordani, T., Spagnolo, N., Albiero, R., Giano, N. D., et al. (2026) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-026-01959-3 · Cited by 1
Deterministic and programmable fusion for the scalable generation of photonic graph states
Li, Y., Yang, Y., Bao, Z., Yang, J., Sun, L., 宋祎璞, Wu, Y., Zhang, H., & Duan, L.-M. (2026) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03471-5 · Cited by 1
Self-citationInterferometrically estimating a quadratic form for any immanant of a matrix and its permutations
Khalique, A., de Guise, H., & Sanders, B. C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052314 · Cited by 1
Programmable quantum processor implemented with superconducting circuit
Jiang, N.-Q., Liang, X., & Wang, M. (2021) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/abe4cb · Cited by 1
Quantum Processors in Silicon Photonics
Paesani, S., & Laing, A. (2021) · Topics in applied physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68222-4_11 · Cited by 1
Experimental quantum state compression from two identical qubits to a qutrit
Xu, Q., Zhou, L., Feng, T., Qiu, S.-F., Li, S.-W., Zhang, W.-J., Luo, H., & Zhou, X. (2024) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2361-6 · Cited by 1
Self-citationHierarchies among genuine multipartite entangling capabilities of quantum gates
Samanta, M., Mondal, S., Hazra, S. K., & (De), A. S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/vhvd-jbnk · Cited by 1
Tailoring the down conversion emission profile via direct imaging with a cameraPreprint
Kuniyil, H., Ozcimen, S., & Durak, K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.04921 · Cited by 1
Quantum overlapping tomography based on linear optics
Yang, Z. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/170876 · Cited by 1
Quantum Optics Systems for Long-Distance Cryptography and Quantum Networks
Rodriguez, V. R. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/c182f4fczda34z4863z8144z47c0b7dc6ad8 · Cited by 1
Exponential enhancement of multi-photon entanglement rate via quantum interference bufferingPreprint
Meyer-Scott, E., Prasannan, N., Dhand, I., Eigner, C., Quiring, V., Barkhofen, S., Brecht, B., Plenio, M. B., & Silberhorn, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Entanglement enhanced communication and sensing
Restuccia, S. (2020) · Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow) · doi:10.5525/gla.thesis.79023
Quantum interferometry with multimode Bi-photon input pulses
Tahir, M. H., & Khalique, A. (2020) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aba1cb
Quantum computing with 20 photons in 60 modes
Lu, C. (2020) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1364/cleo_at.2020.jm4g.4
Self-citationEntanglement dynamics of photonic bell states under different noisy channels
Zhang, Q., Liu, X., Cao, L., Zhao, J.-Q., Lu, H.-X., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/abbe16
Optimizing SPDC soures for a quantum advantage
van der Meer, R., Renema, J. J., Brecht, B., Silberhorn, C., & Pinkse, P. W. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Optics · doi:10.1364/fio.2020.ftu8d.6
Down-Conversion Emission Profile characterisation via Camera
Kuniyil, H., & Durak, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Optics · doi:10.1364/fio.2020.jm6a.21
Scalable Generation of Multi-Photon GHZ States
Brecht, B., Meyer-Scott, E., Prasannan, N., Dhand, I., Barkhofen, S., Quiring, V., Eigner, C., Plenio, M. B., & Silberhorn, C. (2020) · OSA Quantum 2.0 Conference · doi:10.1364/quantum.2020.qm6b.1
High-performance single-photon sources from solid-state quantum emitters
Wang, H., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Asia Communications and Photonics Conference · doi:10.1364/acpc.2020.t3f.1
Self-citationSempere-Llagostera, S., Thekkadath, G., Patel, R. B., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walmsley, I. A. (2021) · Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) · doi:10.1364/qim.2021.w2b.4
Quantum information processing in large-scale photonic networks
van der Meer, R. (2022) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036553346
Advances in detection and regulation of surface-supported molecular quantum states
Yao, J., & Zhao, A. (2022) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.71.20212324
Closing loopholes of measurement-device-independent nonlinear entanglement witnesses
Sen, K., Srivastava, C., & Sen, U. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.052426
Pinching operators for approximating multiphoton entangled states
Turner, S., & Cour, B. R. L. (2025) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131726
Report on scipost_202009_00021v1
Meraner, S., Chapman, R. J., Frick, S., et al. (2020) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.2278
Report on scipost_202009_00021v1
Meraner, S., Chapman, R. J., Frick, S., et al. (2020) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.2291
Simulation of random photon loss in boson sampling of different optical networks
Yang, J., Chen, M., Huang, X., Wu, Y.-Z., & Lan, B. (2022) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220331
Coherent Single Photon Source in an Integrated Diamond Nanophotonic System
Assumpção, D., Knaut, C. M., Knall, E., Bekenstein, R., Gong, W., Machielse, B., Levonian, D., Stas, P.-J., Huan, Y. Q., Riedinger, R., et al. (2022) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1364/cleo_qels.2022.fw5f.2
Multipair emission effects in quantum dot-based entangled photon sources
Neuwirth, J., Basset, F. B., Rota, M. B., da Silva, S. F. C., Jöns, K. D., Rastelli, A., & Trotta, R. (2022) · Quantum Nanophotonic Materials, Devices, and Systems · doi:10.1117/12.2632421
Computational indistinguishability and boson sampling*
Nikolopoulos, G. M. (2022) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aca1ed
Verschränkung wie am Fließband
Barkhofen, S., Brecht, B., & Silberhorn, C. (2023) · Physik in unserer Zeit · doi:10.1002/piuz.202370107
Huang, X., Zhan, L., Li, L., Bao, S., Tao, Z., & Ying, J. (2023) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics10121314 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBagrov, A. R., & Bashkirov, E. K. (2024) · Vestnik of Samara University Natural Science Series · doi:10.18287/2541-7525-2024-30-1-82-95
Giant polarisation rotation with a quantum dot-based spin-photon interface
Mehdi, E. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e2ee5774z2546z4599zb06az0d9a4cfb1aee
Shixin, 尤. Y., Chenzhi, 袁. Y., & Ruibo, 金. J. (2024) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop240742
Estimation of photon number distribution and derivative characteristics of photon-pair sources
Lee, S. M. (2024) · Optics Continuum · doi:10.1364/optcon.524729
Lund, A. P., & Ralph, T. C. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00111-7
Quantum Resource States from Post-Selected Classical Mixed States
Lanham, S. A., & Cour, B. R. L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00091
How to Be a Copenhagenistic-QBistic Everettist
Wieśniak, M. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27030248
Quantum Teleportation of Photon–Photon Diagonal Block Operations
Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhai, X., Zeng, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, J., Wang, M., Liu, C., Liu, X., & Cao, L. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400662
Reconstruction of the reduced transfer matrix for tunable linear-optical circuits
Biguaa, L. V., Kondratyev, I. V., Skryabin, N. N., Dyakonov, I. V., & Kulik, S. P. (2025) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/adc552
Ha, E. C., Kim, Y. H., Park, H. S., & Song, K. Y. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400512
Quantum repeaters: current research trends and latest achievements
Ахмеджанов, Р. А., Balega, Y. Y., Deev, A. D., & Kalachev, A. A. (2025) · Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk · doi:10.3367/ufnr.2025.05.039918
Neural network reconstruction of the reduced transfer matrix for tunable linear-optical chips
Biguaa, L. V., & Kulik, S. P. (2025) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/adf03e
New approaches to multi-photon quantum interference and entanglement
Kumar, S., Jones, A. E., Bhatti, D., Bayerbach, M. J., D’Aurelio, S. E., Hauser, N., & Barz, S. (2025) · Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.1364/quantum.2025.qth4b.7
Efficient recyclable generation protocol for high-dimensional spatial-path GHZ states
Zhu, M.-D., Wang, Y., Gu, S., Wang, X.-F., Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2025) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170225
Self-citationWoo, T., Lee, K., Joe, N., & Lee, J. H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29646-3
Kim, S., Onoe, S., & Marino, A. M. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/wdcl-bnz4
Photon pairs for fundamental tests of physics and applications in quantum networks
Müller, C. (2024) · edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) · doi:10.18452/28208
Towards 4-photon OAM entanglement experiments
Bender, C. (2019) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, H.-S., Li, Y., Li, W., Peng, L.-C., Su, Z.-E., Hu, Y., He, Y.-M., Ding, X., Zhang, W., Li, H., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., You, L., Wang, X.-L., Jiang, X., Li, L., Chen, Y.-A., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-12-21
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 250505-250505
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2896439086
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 18.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (91836303)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- National Fundamental Research Program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- entangled photon pairs, spontaneous parametric down-conversion, heralding efficiency, photon indistinguishability, photonic quantum technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
