Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km

Open access
Chen, Jiu-Peng, Zhang, Chi, Liu, Yang, Jiang, Cong, Zhang, Weijun, Hu, Xiao-Long, Guan, Jian-Yu, Yu, Zong-Wen, Xu, Hai, Lin, Jin, Li, Ming-Jun, Chen, Hao, Li, Hao, You, Lixing, Wang, Zhen, Wang, Xiang-Bin, Zhang, Qiang, Pan, Jian-Wei·2020·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Twin-field (TF) quantum key distribution (QKD) promises high key rates over long distances to beat the rate-distance limit. Here, applying the sending-or-not-sending TF QKD protocol, we experimentally demonstrate a secure key distribution that breaks the absolute key-rate limit of repeaterless QKD over a 509-km-long ultralow loss optical fiber. Two independent lasers are used as sources with remote-frequency-locking technique over the 500-km fiber distance. Practical optical fibers are used as the optical path with appropriate noise filtering; and finite-key effects are considered in the key-rate analysis. The secure key rate obtained at 509 km is more than seven times higher than the relative bound of repeaterless QKD for the same detection loss. The achieved secure key rate is also higher than that of a traditional QKD protocol running with a perfect repeaterless QKD device, even for an infinite number of sent pulses. Our result shows that the protocol and technologies applied in this experiment enable TF QKD to achieve a high secure key rate over a long distribution distance, and is therefore practically useful for field implementation of intercity QKD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.124.070501

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhang, W., Hu, X.-L., Guan, J.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Xu, H., Lin, J., Li, M.-J., Chen, H., Li, H., You, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X.-B., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
124
Issue
7
Pages
070501-070501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2981311533
Cited by
380
References
30
FWCI
25.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.124.070501
The paper
Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhang, W., Hu, X.-L., Guan, J.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Xu, H., Lin, J., Li, M.-J., Chen, H., Li, H., You, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X.-B., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W. (2020). Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.124.070501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.