The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Temperature Superconductivity in a Lightly Doped Quantum Spin Liquid
Open accessAbstract
We have performed density-matrix renormalization group studies of a square lattice $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model with small hole doping, $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, on long four and six-leg cylinders. We include frustration in the form of a second-neighbor exchange coupling, ${J}_{2}={J}_{1}/2$, such that the undoped ($\ensuremath{\delta}=0$) ``parent'' state is a quantum spin liquid. In contrast to the relatively short range superconducting (SC) correlations that have been observed in recent studies of the six-leg cylinder in the absence of frustration, we find power-law SC correlations with a Luttinger exponent, ${K}_{\mathrm{SC}}\ensuremath{\approx}1$, consistent with a strongly diverging SC susceptibility, $\ensuremath{\chi}\ensuremath{\sim}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}(2\ensuremath{-}{K}_{\mathrm{SC}})}$ as the temperature $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The spin-spin correlations---as in the undoped state---fall exponentially suggesting that the SC ``pairing'' correlations evolve smoothly from the insulating parent state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The phase diagram contrasts sharply with that in the context of the t-t'-J model.
“This phase diagram contrasts sharply with that in the context of the t -t ′ -J model ( 43, 44 ), which can be derived as an approximate strong-coupling Hubbard model at low doping.”
From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
On p. 1, the paper contrasts strong, power-law superconducting correlations in its frustrated, lightly doped model with shorter-range correlations reported for six-leg cylinders without frustration. That supports a contrast in superconducting behavior, but the passage does not establish a sharply contrasting phase diagram specifically for the t–t′–J model. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the t-t'-J model, recent DMRG studies point to strong d-wave superconductivity on the electron-doped side, which coexists with antiferromagnetic correlations with increasing strength as t' increases.
“In the t -t ′ -J model, recent DMRG studies all point to strong d -wave superconductivity on the electron-doped side ( 43-45 ), which coexists with antiferromagnetic correlations with increasing strength as t ′ increases; some differences remain concerning whether long-range AF order occurs ( 46 ).”
From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
The superconducting pair-field correlations section (p. 2) reports strong, d-wave-form correlations in a DMRG study, supporting that part of the claim. But the paper studies a lightly hole-doped, frustrated t-J model (p. 1), not the electron-doped side; its spin-spin correlations are short-ranged (p. 3), and it does not report that antiferromagnetic correlations strengthen as t′ increases. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious studies in width-4 cylinders found that the ground state has half-filled stripes.
“Previous studies in width-4 cylinders have found that the ground state in this system has half-filled stripes ( 40, 43, 44 ).”
From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t ′
Jiang, H.-C., & Devereaux, T. P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal5304 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2794 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41567-018-0136-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.224505 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085116 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.165144 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.157001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.140505 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033073 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.104512 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.041106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.475 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.7391 · DOI
- 10.1051/jphys:0198900500180283300 · DOI
- 10.1016/0921-4534(89)90316-X · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R14701 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.8865 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.242.4878.525 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3664 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0217979298000570 · DOI
- 10.1088/0953-8984/16/24/R02 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.165138 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.4619 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.097201 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024424 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.027201 · DOI
- 10.7566/JPSJ.84.024720 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075143 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.107202 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1881 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/01/P01017 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165122 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41535-021-00375-w · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.157002 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067002 · DOI
- 10.1002/qute.202000126 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41535-021-00363-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/374434a0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.097003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model
Xu, H., Chung, C.-M., Qin, M., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh7691 · Cited by 144
“J model, recent DMRG studies all point to strong d -wave superconductivity on the elec-tron-doped side ( 44 – 46 ), which coexists with AFM correlations with increasing strength as t 0 increases;somedifferencesremainconcerning whether long-range AFM order occurs ( 47 ).”
BackgroundResultXu, H., Shi, H., Vitali, E., Qin, M., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013239 · Cited by 74
Jiang, S., Scalapino, D. J., & White, S. R. (2023) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l161111 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, H.-C., & Kivelson, S. A.
- Affiliations
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2021-08-27
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 097002-097002
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W3151056898
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
- Office of Science
- Basic Energy Sciences
- Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- high-temperature superconductivity, quantum spin liquid, t-J model, square lattice, spin frustration, spin-spin correlations, pairing correlations, parent state
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review