Cited by 86Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High Temperature Superconductivity in a Lightly Doped Quantum Spin Liquid

Open access
Jiang, Hong-Chen, Kivelson, Steven A.·2021·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We have performed density-matrix renormalization group studies of a square lattice $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model with small hole doping, $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\ll}1$, on long four and six-leg cylinders. We include frustration in the form of a second-neighbor exchange coupling, ${J}_{2}={J}_{1}/2$, such that the undoped ($\ensuremath{\delta}=0$) ``parent'' state is a quantum spin liquid. In contrast to the relatively short range superconducting (SC) correlations that have been observed in recent studies of the six-leg cylinder in the absence of frustration, we find power-law SC correlations with a Luttinger exponent, ${K}_{\mathrm{SC}}\ensuremath{\approx}1$, consistent with a strongly diverging SC susceptibility, $\ensuremath{\chi}\ensuremath{\sim}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}(2\ensuremath{-}{K}_{\mathrm{SC}})}$ as the temperature $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The spin-spin correlations---as in the undoped state---fall exponentially suggesting that the SC ``pairing'' correlations evolve smoothly from the insulating parent state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.127.097002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phase diagram contrasts sharply with that in the context of the t-t'-J model.

    “This phase diagram contrasts sharply with that in the context of the t -t ′ -J model ( 43, 44 ), which can be derived as an approximate strong-coupling Hubbard model at low doping.”

    From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    On p. 1, the paper contrasts strong, power-law superconducting correlations in its frustrated, lightly doped model with shorter-range correlations reported for six-leg cylinders without frustration. That supports a contrast in superconducting behavior, but the passage does not establish a sharply contrasting phase diagram specifically for the t–t′–J model. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the t-t'-J model, recent DMRG studies point to strong d-wave superconductivity on the electron-doped side, which coexists with antiferromagnetic correlations with increasing strength as t' increases.

    “In the t -t ′ -J model, recent DMRG studies all point to strong d -wave superconductivity on the electron-doped side ( 43-45 ), which coexists with antiferromagnetic correlations with increasing strength as t ′ increases; some differences remain concerning whether long-range AF order occurs ( 46 ).”

    From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The superconducting pair-field correlations section (p. 2) reports strong, d-wave-form correlations in a DMRG study, supporting that part of the claim. But the paper studies a lightly hole-doped, frustrated t-J model (p. 1), not the electron-doped side; its spin-spin correlations are short-ranged (p. 3), and it does not report that antiferromagnetic correlations strengthen as t′ increases. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies in width-4 cylinders found that the ground state has half-filled stripes.

    “Previous studies in width-4 cylinders have found that the ground state in this system has half-filled stripes ( 40, 43, 44 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2794 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41567-018-0136-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.224505 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085116 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.165144 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.157001 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.140505 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033073 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.104512 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.041106 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.475 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.7391 · DOI
  16. 10.1051/jphys:0198900500180283300 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0921-4534(89)90316-X · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R14701 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031016 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.8865 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.242.4878.525 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3664 · DOI
  23. 10.1142/S0217979298000570 · DOI
  24. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/24/R02 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.165138 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.4619 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.097201 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024424 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.027201 · DOI
  31. 10.7566/JPSJ.84.024720 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075143 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.107202 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1881 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/01/P01017 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165122 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41535-021-00375-w · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.157002 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067002 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/qute.202000126 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41535-021-00363-0 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/374434a0 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.097003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, H.-C., & Kivelson, S. A.
Affiliations
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
127
Issue
9
Pages
097002-097002
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W3151056898
Cited by
86
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
  • Office of Science
  • Basic Energy Sciences
  • Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
high-temperature superconductivity, quantum spin liquid, t-J model, square lattice, spin frustration, spin-spin correlations, pairing correlations, parent state

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review