Cited by 1,364Advanced Condensed Matter PhysicsPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismTheoretical and Computational Physics

New Mechanism of Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction

Moriya, Tôru·1960·Physical Review Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.4.228

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction has the form Si × Sj for spins S at sites i and j and is known to promote noncollinear magnetic order.

    “The fundamental microscopic mechanism is the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, which has the form Si × Sj for spins S at sites i and j and which is known to promote noncollinear magnetic order11–13.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moriya, T.
Corresponding author
Moriya, Tôru
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1960-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
228-230
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965164724
Cited by
1,364
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 36
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
superexchange, exchange mechanism, magnetic anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review