Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resistance of Small Metallic Loops

Landauer, R., Büttiker, M.·1985·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

An earlier analysis of small one-dimensional rings of normal metal, driven by an external time-dependent magnetic flux, is extended to allow for inelastic scattering. This supplements the Josephson-type behavior of the earlier discussion by dissipative effects. As in the case of strong one-dimensional localization, dc current grows as inelastic scattering is first introduced, but diminishes again with sufficiently intense inelastic scattering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.54.2049

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Landauer, R., & Büttiker, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1985-05-06
Volume
54
Issue
18
Pages
2049-2052
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089955472
Cited by
300
References
0
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance of Small Metallic Loops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.54.2049
The paper
Landauer, R., & Büttiker, M. (1985). Resistance of Small Metallic Loops. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.54.2049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.