Cited by 368Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsOptical Polarization and EllipsometryNear-Field Optical Microscopy

Role of beam propagation in Goos–Hänchen and Imbert–Fedorov shifts

Open access
Aiello, A., Woerdman, J. P.·2008·Optics Letters

Abstract

We derive the polarization-dependent displacements parallel and perpendicular to the plane of incidence for a Gaussian light beam reflected from a planar interface, taking into account the propagation of the beam. Using a classical-optics formalism we show that beam propagation may greatly affect both Goos-Hänchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts when the incident beam is focused.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.33.001437

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a gradient-index medium, the trajectory of light is described by equations of motion whose last term describes the transverse spin-dependent displacement (spin-Hall effect of light).

    “The last term in Eq. (1) describes the transverse spin-dependent displacement of the trajectory, i.e., the spin-Hall effect of light (Fig. 1a).”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

    The paper describes the transverse Imbert–Fedorov shift at a planar interface and identifies a related spin-dependent photon displacement with the spin Hall effect of light (pp. 1, 3). It does not describe light trajectories in a gradient-index medium or a final term in an equation of motion; its equations concern reflected beams. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A circularly polarized laser beam reflected or refracted at a dielectric interface experiences a tiny transverse spin-dependent shift out of the plane of incidence.

    “(i) A circularly polarized laser beam reflected or refracted at a dielectric interface does not propagate in the original plane but experiences a tiny transverse spin-dependent shift out of this plane.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

  • In a glass cylinder, the spin-Hall effect for a helical light trajectory produced a difference between the positions of right-hand and left-hand circularly-polarized beams of several wavelengths, accumulated along several coils.

    “Figures 1a,b show an example of the spin-Hall effect measured for the helical trajectory of light inside a glass cylinder 17 . The difference between the positions of the right-hand and lefthand circularly-polarized beams ( σ = ± 1) achieved several wavelengths, which was accumulated along several coils of the trajectory.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

    The paper describes reflection from a planar interface and polarization-dependent beam shifts (p. 1), and discusses propagation-based enhancement of a spin-Hall-effect measurement (pp. 1–3). Searches for a helical trajectory, glass cylinder, several coils, and a separation of several wavelengths found no passage addressing the claimed experiment. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The helicity-dependent term in the equations of motion can be considered as a Lorentz force produced by the Berry curvature acting in momentum space.

    “Later, it was shown that the helicity-dependent term in Eq. (1) can be considered as a 'Lorentz force' produced by the Berry curvature F σ P ( ) acting in momentum space 7,13,14,17 (Box 2).”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

    The paper’s summary (p. 3) describes classical-optics expressions for beam shifts and a classical interpretation of a spin Hall effect measurement. Neither that passage nor the passages retrieved by searching for Berry curvature, a Lorentz force, helicity, and equations of motion address the claimed momentum-space mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A number of experiments observed spin-orbit coupling and polarization transport of light in complex speckle fields of multimode optical fibers.

    “There had been a number of remarkable experiment [120 -123] which observed the spin-orbit coupling and polarization transport of light in complex speckle fields of multimode optical fibers (see also [24]),”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]3. O. Costa de Beauregard and C. Imbert. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 28(18):1211, 1972.
  2. [4]4. C. Imbert. Phys. Rev. D , 5(4):787, 1972.
  3. [5]5. F. Pillon, H. Gilles, and S. Girard. Appl. Opt. , 43(9):1863, 2004.
  4. [8]8. H. M. Lai, C. W. Kwok, Y. W. Loo, and B. Y. Xu. Phys. Rev. E , 62(5):7330, 2000.
  5. [15]15. H. A. Haus and J. L. Pan. Am. J. Phys. , 61(9):818, 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aiello, A., & Woerdman, J. P.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2008-06-23
Volume
33
Issue
13
Pages
1437
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W2109256912
Cited by
368
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Keywords
Goos-Hänchen shift, Imbert-Fedorov shift, beam propagation, Gaussian beam, focused beams, classical optics, beam deflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review