Cited by 437Theoretical and Computational PhysicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsSimulation Techniques and Applications

Monte Carlo simulations: Hidden errors from ‘‘good’’ random number generators

Ferrenberg, Alan M., Landau, D. P., Wong, Y. Joanna·1992·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The Wolff algorithm is now accepted as the best cluster-flipping Monte Carlo algorithm for beating ``critical slowing down.'' We show how this method can yield incorrect answers due to subtle correlations in ``high quality'' random number generators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.69.3382

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A.M. Ferrenberg et al. identified hidden systematic errors in Monte Carlo simulations when using PRNGs such as CONG, R250, R1279, SWC and SWCW; these generators passed standard statistical randomness tests but exhibited hidden correlations and significant biases in real-world simulations.

    “A.M. Ferrenberg et al.15 identified hidden systematic errors in Monte Carlo simulations when using Pseudo Random Number Generators (PRNGs), such as CONG, R250, R1279, SWC and SWCW. Although these generators successfully passed standard statistical randomness tests, they exhibited hidden correlations and significant biases when applied to real-world simulations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrenberg, A. M., Landau, D. P., & Wong, Y. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1992-12-07
Volume
69
Issue
23
Pages
3382-3384
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090824272
Cited by
437
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
random number generators, Wolff cluster algorithm, critical slowing down

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review