Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bose-Einstein Condensation of Lithium: Observation of Limited Condensate Number

Bradley, C. C., Sackett, C. A., Hulet, R. G.·1997·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Bose-Einstein condensation of ${}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ has been studied in a magnetically trapped gas. Because of the effectively attractive interactions between ${}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ atoms, many-body quantum theory predicts that the occupation number of the condensate is limited to about 1400 atoms. We observe the condensate number to be limited to a maximum value between 650 and 1300 atoms. The measurements were made using a versatile phase-contrast imaging technique.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.78.985

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,238

Metadata

Authors
Bradley, C. C., Sackett, C. A., & Hulet, R. G.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1997-02-10
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
985-989
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1973406635
Cited by
1,238
References
0
FWCI
81.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bose-Einstein Condensation of Lithium: Observation of Limited Condensate Number. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.78.985
The paper
Bradley, C. C., Sackett, C. A., & Hulet, R. G. (1997). Bose-Einstein Condensation of Lithium: Observation of Limited Condensate Number. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.78.985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.