The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Open accessAbstract
The optimal precision of frequency measurements in the presence of decoherence is discussed. We analyze different preparations of $n$ two-level systems as well as different measurement procedures. We show that standard Ramsey spectroscopy on uncorrelated atoms and optimal measurements on maximally entangled states provide the same resolution. The best resolution is achieved using partially entangled preparations with a high degree of symmetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the presence of decoherence, the optimal input states do not have an intuitive form and the maximization of the QFI (with rising N) becomes hard even numerically202930.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“environment assisted excitation energy transport in photosynthesis [11, 15, 16], magneto-reception of birds [17-19] and the mechanism underlying olfaction [20, 21], for which there is some compelling theoretical and/or experimental evidence that quantum phenomena are essential for their understanding.”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“investigations in quantum biology found that they may enhance transport for example in photosynthetic quantum networks [15, 16].”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“the conductivity of the electronic transport network in the FMO complex (quantified as the rate at which the reaction center is populated in steady state divided by the rate at which excitations enter the transport network) exhibits a maximum at a finite dephasing rate”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“dephasing noise can actually assist the electronic transport [15, 16].”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Moore, F. L., & Heinzen, D. J. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.r6797 · Cited by 1,135
Gardiner, C. W. (1991) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09642-0 · Cited by 993
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates
Barenco, A., Deutsch, D., EKERT, A. K., & Jozsa, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4083 · Cited by 971
Self-citationStatistical distance and Hilbert space
Wootters, W. K. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.357 · Cited by 793
Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1996) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · Cited by 732
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613
Progress at NIST toward absolute frequency standards using stored ions
Wineland, D. J., Bergquist, J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J., Gilbert, S. L., Manney, C. H., & Raizen, M. G. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.63107 · Cited by 68
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 975
Symmetric Logarithmic Derivative of Fermionic Gaussian States
Carollo, A. C. M., Spagnolo, B., & Valenti, D. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20070485 · Cited by 70
Noisy Quantum Metrology Enhanced by Continuous Nondemolition Measurement
Rossi, M. A. C., Albarelli, F., Tamascelli, D., & Genoni, M. G. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.200505 · Cited by 69
Heralded Generation of an Atomic NOON State
Chen, Y.-A., Bao, X., Yuan, Z.-S., Chen, S., Zhao, B., & Pan, J.-W. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.043601 · Cited by 68
Entanglement-Based dc Magnetometry with Separated Ions
Ruster, T., Kaufmann, H., Luda, M. A., Kaushal, V., Schmiegelow, C. T., Schmidt‐Kaler, F., & Poschinger, U. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031050 · Cited by 67
Entangled quantum probes for dynamical environmental noise
Rossi, M. A. C., & Paris, M. G. A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.010302 · Cited by 67
Pairing in fermionic systems: A quantum-information perspective
Kraus, C. V., Wolf, M. M., Cirac, J. I., & Giedke, G. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.012306 · Cited by 66
Self-citationOptimal atomic quantum sensing using electromagnetically-induced-transparency readout
Meyer, D. H., O’Brien, C., Fahey, D. P., Cox, K. C., & Kunz, P. D. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.043103 · Cited by 65
Stroboscopic Backaction Evasion in a Dense Alkali-Metal Vapor
Vasilakis, G., Shah, V., & Romalis, M. V. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.143601 · Cited by 65
Precision Limits in Quantum Metrology with Open Quantum Systems
Haase, J. F., Smirne, A., Huelga, S. F., Kołodyński, J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology · doi:10.1515/qmetro-2018-0002 · Cited by 68
Self-citationRobust Quantum Sensing in Strongly Interacting Systems with Many-Body Scars
Dooley, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020330 · Cited by 68
Quantum Metrology for Non-Markovian Processes
Altherr, A., & Yang, Y. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.060501 · Cited by 71
The parity operator: Applications in quantum metrology
Birrittella, R. J., Alsing, P. M., & Gerry, C. C. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0026148 · Cited by 68
Xavier, J., Yu, D., Jones, C., Zossimova, E., & Vollmer, F. (2021) · Nanophotonics · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0593 · Cited by 66
Use of maximally entangled N-photon states for practical quantum interferometry
Gilbert, G. N., Hamrick, M., & Weinstein, Y. S. (2008) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.25.001336 · Cited by 64
Recovering noise-free quantum observables
Otten, M., & Gray, S. K. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012338 · Cited by 61
Quantum Light in Coupled Interferometers for Quantum Gravity Tests
Berchera, I. R., Degiovanni, I. P., Olivares, S., & Genovese, M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.213601 · Cited by 61
Atoms and molecules in the search for time-reversal symmetry violation
Cairncross, W. B., & Ye, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0080-0 · Cited by 64
Exceptional points for parameter estimation in open quantum systems: analysis of the Bloch equations
Am-Shallem, M., Kosloff, R., & Moiseyev, N. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113036 · Cited by 60
Enhancing parameter precision of optimal quantum estimation by direct quantum feedback
Zheng, Q., Ge, L., Yao, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.033805 · Cited by 61
Prospects and challenges for squeezing-enhanced optical atomic clocks
Schulte, M., Lisdat, C., Schmidt, P. O., Sterr, U., & Hammerer, K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7 · Cited by 60
Entangled quantum states of atomic systems
Bargatin, I., Grishanin, B. A., & Задков, В. Н. (2001) · Physics-Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu2001v044n06abeh000940 · Cited by 60
Conlon, L. O., Suzuki, J., Lam, P. K., & Assad, S. M. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00414-1 · Cited by 65
Quantum metrology for the Ising Hamiltonian with transverse magnetic field
Skotiniotis, M., Sekatski, P., & Dür, W. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073032 · Cited by 59
Optimal phase estimation with arbitrary a priori knowledge
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.061802 · Cited by 66
Proposed Robust Entanglement-Based Magnetic Field Sensor Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit
Tanaka, T., Knott, P. A., Matsuzaki, Y., Dooley, S., Yamaguchi, H., Munro, W. J., & Saito, S. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.170801 · Cited by 62
Local quantum uncertainty and local quantum Fisher information in two-coupled double quantum dots
Elghaayda, S., Dahbi, Z., & Mansour, M. (2022) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-022-03829-y · Cited by 58
Spectroscopy of cross correlations of environmental noises with two qubits
Szańkowski, P., Trippenbach, M., & Cywiński, Ł. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.012109 · Cited by 62
Phase-sensitivity bounds for two-mode interferometers
Pezzè, L., Hyllus, P., & Smerzi, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.032103 · Cited by 59
Quantum-limited measurements of atomic scattering properties
Rey, A. M., Jiang, L., & Lukin, M. D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.053617 · Cited by 56
Using Adaptiveness and Causal Superpositions Against Noise in Quantum Metrology
Kurdziałek, S., Górecki, W., Albarelli, F., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.090801 · Cited by 67
Stationary Source of Nonclassical or Entangled Atoms
Fleischhauer, M., & Gong, S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.070404 · Cited by 55
Critical quantum metrology with fully-connected models: from Heisenberg to Kibble–Zurek scaling
Garbe, L., Abah, O., Felicetti, S., & Puebla, R. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac6ca5 · Cited by 62
Quantum metrology subject to spatially correlated Markovian noise: restoring the Heisenberg limit
Jeske, J., Cole, J. H., & Huelga, S. F. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/073039 · Cited by 57
Self-citationExtended convexity of quantum Fisher information in quantum metrology
Alipour, S., & Rezakhani, A. T. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042104 · Cited by 54
Maximal Quantum Fisher Information for Mixed States
Fiderer, L. J., Fraïsse, J. M. E., & Braun, D. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.250502 · Cited by 54
Many-body protected entanglement generation in interacting spin systems
Rey, A. M., Jiang, L., Fleischhauer, M., Demler, E., & Lukin, M. D. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.052305 · Cited by 54
Measuring the entanglement of bipartite pure states
Sancho, J. M. G., & Huelga, S. F. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042303 · Cited by 54
Self-citationGaussian interferometric power
Adesso, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022321 · Cited by 57
Khalil, E. M., Abdalla, M. S., Obada, A. ‐. F., & Peřina, J. (2010) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.27.000266 · Cited by 52
Error-Mitigated Quantum Metrology via Virtual Purification
Yamamoto, K., Endo, S., Hakoshima, H., Matsuzaki, Y., & Tokunaga, Y. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.250503 · Cited by 55
Multi-ensemble metrology by programming local rotations with atom movements
Shaw, A. L., Finkelstein, R., Tsai, R. B.-S., Scholl, P., Yoon, T. H., Choi, J., & Endres, M. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02323-w · Cited by 54
Demonstrating Quantum Coherence and Metrology that is Resilient to Transversal Noise
Zhang, C., Bromley, T. R., Huang, Y., Cao, H., Lv, W.-M., Liu, B., Li, C., Guo, G., Cianciaruso, M., & Adesso, G. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.180504 · Cited by 52
Optimal probes and error-correction schemes in multi-parameter quantum metrology
Górecki, W., Zhou, S., Jiang, L., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-07-02-288 · Cited by 63
Conditional Ramsey Spectroscopy with Synchronized Atoms
Xu, M., & Holland, M. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.103601 · Cited by 51
Zeno limit in frequency estimation with non-Markovian environments
Macieszczak, K. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.010102 · Cited by 52
Ramsey interferometry with generalized one-axis twisting echoes
Schulte, M., Martínez-Lahuerta, V. J., Scharnagl, M. S., & Hammerer, K. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-15-268 · Cited by 50
Probing fundamental physics with spin-based quantum sensors
Kimball, D. F. J., Budker, D., Chupp, T. E., Geraci, A. A., Kolkowitz, S., Singh, J. T., & Sushkov, A. O. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.010101 · Cited by 53
Mixed collective states of many spins
Wesenberg, J. H., & Mølmer, K. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062304 · Cited by 49
Strong Quantum Metrological Limit from Many-Body Physics
Chu, Y., Li, X., & Cai, J. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.170801 · Cited by 50
Obada, A. ‐. F., Ahmed, M. M. A., Khalil, E. M., & Ali, S. I. (2012) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.08.091 · Cited by 48
Quantum-limited metrology in the presence of collisional dephasing
Liu, Y., Jin, G., & You, L. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.045601 · Cited by 48
Non-Markovian Quantum Thermometry
Zhang, N., Chen, C., Bai, S., Wu, W., & An, J. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.034073 · Cited by 48
Quantum-Enhanced Heat Engine Based on Superabsorption
Kamimura, S., Hakoshima, H., Matsuzaki, Y., Yoshida, K., & 都倉, 康. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.180602 · Cited by 49
Lu, H., Chen, L.-K., Liu, C., Xu, P., Yao, X.-C., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Zhao, B., Chen, Y.-A., & Pan, J.-W. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.81 · Cited by 46
Coherent Atom Interactions Mediated by Dark-State Polaritons
André, A., Duan, L.-M., & Lukin, M. D. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.243602 · Cited by 46
Fuchs, C. A., & Mermin, N. D. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0105039 · Cited by 64
Abdalla, M. S., Khalil, E. M., & Obada, A. ‐. F. (2007) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2006.12.003 · Cited by 45
Tensor-network approach for quantum metrology in many-body quantum systems
Chabuda, K., Dziarmaga, J., Osborne, T. J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13735-9 · Cited by 50
Kubica, A., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.150503 · Cited by 50
Quantum metrology: Heisenberg limit with bound entanglement
Czekaj, Ł., Przysiężna, A., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, P. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062303 · Cited by 46
Optimal quantum states for frequency estimation
Fröwis, F., Skotiniotis, M., Kraus, B., & Dür, W. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/083010 · Cited by 48
Exact treatment of the Jaynes–Cummings model under the action of an external classical field
Abdalla, M. S., Khalil, E. M., & Obada, A. ‐. F. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.05.005 · Cited by 44
Non-Markovian sensing of a quantum reservoir
Wu, W., Bai, S., & An, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.l010601 · Cited by 44
Quantum metrology with nonequilibrium steady states of quantum spin chains
Marzolino, U., & Prosen, T. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.062130 · Cited by 44
Asymptotic role of entanglement in quantum metrology
Augusiak, R., Kołodyński, J., Streltsov, A., Bera, M. N., Acín, A., & Lewenstein, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.012339 · Cited by 46
Luis, A. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.054102 · Cited by 43
Engineering entanglement between two cavity modes
Ikram, M., & Saif, F. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.014304 · Cited by 44
Probing beyond the laser coherence time in optical clock comparisons
Hume, D. B., & Leibrandt, D. R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032138 · Cited by 42
Entangled quantum states of atomic systems
Bargatin, I., Grishanin, B. A., & Задков, В. Н. (2001) · Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk · doi:10.3367/ufnr.0171.200106c.0625 · Cited by 42
Floquet Engineering to Overcome No-Go Theorem of Noisy Quantum Metrology
Bai, S., & An, J. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.050801 · Cited by 43
Adiabatic quantum metrology with strongly correlated quantum optical systems
Ivanov, P. A., & Porras, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.023803 · Cited by 43
Efficient entanglement concentration for arbitrary less-entangled NOON states
Zhou, L., Sheng, Y., Cheng, W. W., Gong, L., & Zhao, S. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0472-x · Cited by 42
Quantum metrology with molecular ensembles
Schaffry, M., Gauger, E. M., Morton, J. J. L., Fitzsimons, J. F., Benjamin, S. C., & Lovett, B. W. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042114 · Cited by 41
Symmetry criteria for quantum simulability of effective interactions
Zimborás, Z., Zeier, R., Schulte‐Herbrüggen, T., & Burgarth, D. K. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042309 · Cited by 44
Quantum replication at the Heisenberg limit
Chiribella, G., Yang, Y., & Yao, A. C.-C. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3915 · Cited by 40
Matrix Product States for Quantum Metrology
Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.240405 · Cited by 43
Quantum Error-Correction-Enhanced Magnetometer Overcoming the Limit Imposed by Relaxation
Herrera-Martí, D. A., Gefen, T., Aharonov, D., Katz, N. Y., & Retzker, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.200501 · Cited by 41
Proposals for creating Schrödinger cat states in Bose-Einstein condensates
Dunningham, J., & Burnett, K. R. (2001) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340108240890 · Cited by 40
Sensing in the presence of an observed environment
Plenio, M. B., & Huelga, S. F. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032123 · Cited by 40
Self-citationOptimal approximate quantum error correction for quantum metrology
Zhou, S., & Jiang, L. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013235 · Cited by 48
Quantum parameter estimation affected by unitary disturbance
Pasquale, A. D., Rossini, D., Paolo Facchi, A., & Giovannetti, V. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052117 · Cited by 39
On-line estimation of local oscillator noise and optimisation of servo parameters in atomic clocks
Leroux, I. D., Scharnhorst, N., Hannig, S., Kramer, J., Pelzer, L., Stepanova, M., & Schmidt, P. O. (2017) · Metrologia · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aa66e9 · Cited by 38
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-correlated atomic ensembles
Polzik, E. S. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.4202 · Cited by 38
Practical quantum metrology in noisy environments
Nichols, R., Bromley, T. R., Correa, L. A., & Adesso, G. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042101 · Cited by 40
Mode engineering for realistic quantum-enhanced interferometry
Jachura, M., Chrapkiewicz, R., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Wasilewski, W., & Banaszek, K. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11411 · Cited by 39
Quantum Metrology beyond the Classical Limit under the Effect of Dephasing
Matsuzaki, Y., Benjamin, S. C., Nakayama, S., Saito, S., & Munro, W. J. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.140501 · Cited by 37
Experimental demonstration of secure quantum remote sensing
Yin, P., Takeuchi, Y., Zhang, W.-H., Yin, Z.-Q., Matsuzaki, Y., Peng, X.-X., Xu, X.-Y., Xu, J.-S., Tang, J.-S., Zhou, Z.-Q., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014065 · Cited by 37
Optimal approximate quantum error correction for quantum metrology
Zhou, S., & Jiang, L. (2020) · University of Chicago · doi:10.6082/cj1av-2st07 · Cited by 37
Intuitive reason for the usefulness of entanglement in quantum metrology
Maccone, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042109 · Cited by 39
Improved Test of Local Lorentz Invariance from a Deterministic Preparation of Entangled States
Megidish, E., Broz, J., Greene, N., & Häffner, H. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.123605 · Cited by 41
Characterization of quantum angular-momentum fluctuations via principal components
Rivas, ́., & Luis, A. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.022105 · Cited by 37
Brito, F., & Werlang, T. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/072001 · Cited by 36
Measurement of entangled states via atomic beam deflection in Bragg’s regime
Khosa, A. H., Ikram, M., & Zubairy, M. S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052312 · Cited by 36
Entanglement and the speed of evolution in mixed states
Kupferman, J., & Reznik, B. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.042305 · Cited by 36
Lossy quantum-optical metrology with squeezed states
Zhang, X.-X., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.013838 · Cited by 36
Heisenberg Limit Superradiant Superresolving Metrology
Wang, D., & Scully, M. O. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.083601 · Cited by 38
Effect of multimode entanglement on lossy optical quantum metrology
Knott, P., Proctor, T. J., Nemoto, K., Dunningham, J., & Munro, W. J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.033846 · Cited by 35
One- and two-mode squeezed light in correlated interferometry
Berchera, I. R., Degiovanni, I. P., Olivares, S., Samantaray, N., Traina, P., & Genovese, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.053821 · Cited by 35
Optimally controlled quantum discrimination and estimation
Basilewitsch, D., Yuan, H., & Koch, C. P. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033396 · Cited by 35
Quantum parameter estimation in a dissipative environment
Wu, W., & Shi, C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.032607 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-11-17
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3865-3868
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2015876000
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Austrian Science Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- frequency standards, quantum entanglement, decoherence, Ramsey spectroscopy, two-level system, maximally entangled states, partially entangled states, optimal measurement, frequency resolution, quantum metrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
