Statistical distance and Hilbert space
Abstract
A concept of "statistical distance" is defined between different preparations of the same quantum system, or in other words, between different rays in the same Hilbert space. Statistical distance is determined entirely by the size of statistical fluctuations occurring in measurements designed to distinguish one state from another. It is not related, a priori, to the usual distance (or angle) between rays. One finds, however, that these two kinds of distance are in fact the same, a result which depends on certain peculiarities of quantum mechanics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For pure states, the angle between initial and final states is the arccosine of the absolute overlap.
“for pure states the angle is simply given by [61] L (|ψ 0 , |ψ τ ) = arccos (| ψ 0 |ψ τ |), (23”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [61]
Wootters concluded that the shortest path connecting vectors in Hilbert space is identical to the geodesic under the Fisher-Rao metric.
“As a main conclusion Wootters showed that the shortest path connecting vectors in Hilbert space, i.e. the angle between these vectors, is identical to the geodesic under the Fisher-Rao metric.”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [61]
All three approaches to survival probability have the common lower bound (2).
“All three approaches, therefore, have the common lower bound (2).”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [19]
The quantum Fisher information satisfies F(ρ,H) ≤ 4(∆H)^2_ρ/ħ^2, with equality if ρ is pure.
“Note that F ( ρ, H ) can be further estimated as F ( ρ, H ) ≤ 4 (∆ H ) 2 ρ / ℏ 2 [12, 19]. The equality holds if ρ is pure.”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [19]
Wootters' statistical distance is the only Riemannian metric, up to a constant factor, that is invariant under all unitary transformations.
“Wootters' statistical distance is the only Riemannian metric, up to a constant factor, which is invariant under all unitary transformations.”
From Energy–time uncertainty relation for driven quantum systems (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
The Wootters distance is related to the fidelity |〈ψ|φ〉|^2, which is the probability of mistaking |ψ〉 for |φ〉 in a single-shot measurement.
“Notice how the Wootters distance is related to the fidelity |〈 y | f 〉| 2 , which is the probability of mistaking | y 〉 for | f 〉 in a single-shot measurement.”
From Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
For pure quantum states, the statistical distance simplifies to the Wootters distance.
“In the case of pure quantum states this distance simplifies considerably, and we obtain the Wootters distance [8].”
From Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
The quantum Fisher information and the Bures metric are the same when two infinitesimally close states being compared are pure, or when both are described by a full rank density matrix.
“It has been shown that these quantities are the same when two infinitesimally close states that are being compared are pure [17], or when they are both described by a full rank density matrix [1, 18].”
From Discontinuities of the quantum Fisher information and the Bures metric (2017) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Diffusion models in population genetics
Kimura, M. (1964) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.2307/3211856 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Fisher, R. A. (1923) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0370164600023993 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics
Geisser, S., & Fisz, M. (1964) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266103 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The Uses and Usefulness of Binomial Probability Paper
Mosteller, F. C., & Tukey, J. W. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483300 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Quantum theory and the bayesian inference problems
Sýkora, S. (1974) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01019475 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176 · see citing works
Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
Jozsa, R. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 · Cited by 1,911 · see citing works
Entanglement measures and purification procedures
Vedral, V., & Plenio, M. B. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.1619 · Cited by 1,419 · see citing works
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit
Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.100401 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Noncommuting Mixed States Cannot Be Broadcast
Barnum, H., Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., Jozsa, R., & Schumacher, B. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.2818 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
FIDELITY APPROACH TO QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS
GU, S.-J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210056335 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa86c6 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Quantum critical scaling of the geometric tensors
Campos Venuti, L., & Zanardi, P. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.095701 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits
Pires, D. P., Cianciaruso, M., Céleri, L. C., Adesso, G., & Soares-Pinto, D. O. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021031 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Generalized Clausius inequality for nonequilibrium quantum processes
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.170402 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Informational distance on quantum-state space
Luo, S., & Zhang, Q. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.032106 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Energy–time uncertainty relation for driven quantum systems
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2013) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/33/335302 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltonians
Pang, S., & Jordan, A. N. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14695 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit
Jones, P. J., & Kok, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.022107 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Bures volume of the set of mixed quantum states
Sommers, H.-J. R., & Zyczkowski, K. (2003) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/39/308 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher metric and estimation for pure state models
Fujiwara, A., & Nagaoka, H. (1995) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00269-9 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Tightening Quantum Speed Limits for Almost All States
Campaioli, F., Pollock, F. A., Binder, F. C., & Modi, K. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.060409 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Discontinuities of the quantum Fisher information and the Bures metric
Šafránek, D. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.052320 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Bures metric over thermal state manifolds and quantum criticality
Zanardi, P., Campos Venuti, L., & Giorda, P. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.062318 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Wigner–Yanase information on quantum state space: The geometric approach
Gibilisco, P., & Isola, T. (2003) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1598279 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Simple expression for the quantum Fisher information matrix
Šafránek, D. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042322 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Tight, robust, and feasible quantum speed limits for open dynamics
Campaioli, F., Pollock, F. A., & Modi, K. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-08-05-168 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Usually, to generalize QSL for when the initial and final states are not pure, the Fubini-Study distance, mentioned in the introduction, is replaced by the Bures distance [3, 55]:”
BackgroundKind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution
Fröwis, F. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.052127 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Speeding up critical system dynamics through optimized evolution
Caneva, T., Calarco, T., Fazio, R., Santoro, G. E., & Montangero, S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012312 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Quantum speed limit for mixed states using an experimentally realizable metric
Mondal, D., & Pati, A. K. (2016) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.02.018 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Geometry of Quantum Statistical Inference
Brody, D. C., & Hughston, L. P. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2851 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Quantum non-Markovianity based on the Fisher-information matrix
Song, H., Luo, S., & Hong, Y. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042110 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Thermodynamic length for far-from-equilibrium quantum systems
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.87.022143 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Bures and statistical distance for squeezed thermal states
Twamley, J. (1996) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/29/13/036 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Rossi, L., Torsello, A., & Hancock, E. R. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.022815 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Quantum information and physics: Some future directions
Preskill, J. (2000) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/095003400148097 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Berry curvature as a lower bound for multiparameter estimation
Guo, W., Zhong, W., Jing, X.-X., Fu, L.-B., & Wang, X. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042115 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wootters, W. K.
- ORCID
- Wootters, W. K.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1981-01-15
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-362
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964348979
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- statistical distance, Hilbert spaces, quantum state discrimination, statistical fluctuations, quantum measurement, quantum state distinguishability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review