The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Open accessAbstract
The optimal precision of frequency measurements in the presence of decoherence is discussed. We analyze different preparations of $n$ two-level systems as well as different measurement procedures. We show that standard Ramsey spectroscopy on uncorrelated atoms and optimal measurements on maximally entangled states provide the same resolution. The best resolution is achieved using partially entangled preparations with a high degree of symmetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the presence of decoherence, the optimal input states do not have an intuitive form and the maximization of the QFI (with rising N) becomes hard even numerically202930.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“environment assisted excitation energy transport in photosynthesis [11, 15, 16], magneto-reception of birds [17-19] and the mechanism underlying olfaction [20, 21], for which there is some compelling theoretical and/or experimental evidence that quantum phenomena are essential for their understanding.”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“investigations in quantum biology found that they may enhance transport for example in photosynthetic quantum networks [15, 16].”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“the conductivity of the electronic transport network in the FMO complex (quantified as the rate at which the reaction center is populated in steady state divided by the rate at which excitations enter the transport network) exhibits a maximum at a finite dephasing rate”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“dephasing noise can actually assist the electronic transport [15, 16].”
From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Moore, F. L., & Heinzen, D. J. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.r6797 · Cited by 1,135
Gardiner, C. W. (1991) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09642-0 · Cited by 993
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates
Barenco, A., Deutsch, D., EKERT, A. K., & Jozsa, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4083 · Cited by 971
Self-citationStatistical distance and Hilbert space
Wootters, W. K. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.357 · Cited by 793
Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1996) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · Cited by 732
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613
Progress at NIST toward absolute frequency standards using stored ions
Wineland, D. J., Bergquist, J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J., Gilbert, S. L., Manney, C. H., & Raizen, M. G. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.63107 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 975
Maximal quantum Fisher information for general su(2) parametrization processes
Jing, X.-X., Liu, J., Xiong, H.-N., & Wang, X. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012312 · Cited by 37
Parameter estimation with cluster states
Rosenkranz, M., & Jaksch, D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022103 · Cited by 35
Non-Gaussian precision metrology via driving through quantum phase transitions
Huang, J., Zhuang, M., & Lee, C. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.032116 · Cited by 36
Quantum remote sensing with asymmetric information gain
Takeuchi, Y., Matsuzaki, Y., Miyanishi, K., Sugiyama, T., & Munro, W. J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022325 · Cited by 35
Quantum metrology in a non-Markovian quantum evolution
Mirkin, N., Larocca, M., & Wisniacki, D. A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022618 · Cited by 34
Bio‐Inspired and Nanoscale Integrated Computing
Eshaghian‐Wilner, M. M., & service), W. I. (. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470429983 · Cited by 34
QUANTUM METROLOGY WITH COLD ATOMS
Huang, J., Wu, S., Zhong, H., & Lee, C. (2014) · Annual review of cold atoms and molecules · doi:10.1142/9789814590174_0007 · Cited by 34
Phase-shift amplification for precision measurements without nonclassical states
Luis, A. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.025802 · Cited by 34
Generating a Superposition of Spin States in an Atomic Ensemble
Massar, S., & Polzik, E. S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.060401 · Cited by 34
Limitations of entanglement between photons and atoms coupled out from a Bose-Einstein condensate
Gasenzer, T., Roberts, D. C. K., & Burnett, K. R. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.021605 · Cited by 34
Yang, C. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062302 · Cited by 33
Superposition, Entanglement, and Raising Schrödinger’s Cat (Nobel Lecture)
Wineland, D. J. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201303404 · Cited by 33
Impact of non-unitary spin squeezing on atomic clock performance
Braverman, B., Kawasaki, A., & Vuletić, V. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae563 · Cited by 34
Haseli, S. (2020) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/abac65 · Cited by 33
Maccone, L., & Giovannetti, V. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1976 · Cited by 33
Optimized Double-Well Quantum Interferometry with Gaussian Squeezed States
Huang, Y. P., & Moore, M. G. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.250406 · Cited by 34
Sub–shot-noise sensitivities without entanglement
Benatti, F., & Braun, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012340 · Cited by 34
Decoherence in collective quantum memories for photons
Mewes, C. K. A., & Fleischhauer, M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022327 · Cited by 33
Pasquale, A. D., & Stace, T. M. (2018) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99046-0_21 · Cited by 41
Horodecki, R. (2021) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.139.197 · Cited by 37
Tighter quantum uncertainty relations following from a general probabilistic bound
Fröwis, F., Schmied, R., & Gisin, N. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012102 · Cited by 34
Yang, C., & Han, S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.062323 · Cited by 32
Quantum metrology in local dissipative environments
Wang, Y.-S., Chen, C., & An, J.-H. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa8b01 · Cited by 32
Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm with Gaussian Spin States
Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040301 · Cited by 36
Vaucher, B., Nunnenkamp, A., & Jaksch, D. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023005 · Cited by 32
Criticality-enhanced electric field gradient sensor with single trapped ions
Ilias, T., Yang, D., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00833-w · Cited by 32
Self-citationProtecting the precision of estimation in a photonic crystal
Berrada, K. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.000571 · Cited by 31
Achieving sub-shot-noise sensing at finite temperatures
Mehboudi, M., Correa, L. A., & Sanpera, A. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042121 · Cited by 33
Bias in Error-Corrected Quantum Sensing
Rojkov, I., Layden, D., Cappellaro, P., Home, J., & Reiter, F. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.140503 · Cited by 31
Scaling Laws for the Sensitivity Enhancement of Non-Gaussian Spin States
Baamara, Y., Sinatra, A., & Gessner, M. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.160501 · Cited by 32
Górecki, W., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.040504 · Cited by 33
Tóth, G., & Fröwis, F. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013075 · Cited by 33
Optimal nonequilibrium thermometry in Markovian environments
Sekatski, P., & Perarnau-Llobet, M. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-12-07-869 · Cited by 31
States for phase estimation in quantum interferometry
Combes, J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2004) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/1/004 · Cited by 31
Electromagnetic shielding in quantum metrology
Jin, Y., & Yu, H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022120 · Cited by 31
Optimal Compression for Identically Prepared Qubit States
Yang, Y., Chiribella, G., & Hayashi, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.090502 · Cited by 35
Robust Quantum Enhanced Phase Estimation in a Multimode Interferometer
Cooper, J. J., Hallwood, D. W., Dunningham, J., & Brand, J. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.130402 · Cited by 32
Latune, C. L., Escher, B. M., Filho, R. L. D. M., & Davidovich, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042112 · Cited by 32
Chapeau‐Blondeau, F. (2017) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2017.02.037 · Cited by 30
Stability of encoded macroscopic quantum superpositions
Fröwis, F., & Dür, W. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.052329 · Cited by 30
Dissipative quantum metrology in manybody systems of identical particles
Benatti, F., Alipour, S., & Rezakhani, A. T. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015023 · Cited by 30
Efficient Scheme for the Deterministic Maximal Entanglement of N Trapped Ions
Steinbach, J., & Gerry, C. C. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5528 · Cited by 30
Zeno dynamics in quantum open systems
Zhang, Y.-R., & Fan, H. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11509 · Cited by 30
Horodecki, M., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.062314 · Cited by 29
Chabuda, K., Leroux, I. D., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083035 · Cited by 30
High-precision force sensing using a single trapped ion
Ivanov, P. A., Vitanov, N. V., & Singer, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep28078 · Cited by 29
Quantum Fisher information matrix in Heisenberg XY model
Lahcen, B., Slaoui, A., Mohammed Daoud, A., & Laamara, R. A. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2282-x · Cited by 29
Local invariants for multi-partite entangled states allowing for a simple entanglement criterion
Aschauer, H., Calsamiglia, J., Hein, M., & Briegel, H. J. (2004) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic4.5-4 · Cited by 29
Localization-driven quantum sensing
Sahoo, A., Mishra, U., & Rakshit, D. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.l030601 · Cited by 33
Quantum Metrology in the Noisy Intermediate‐Scale Quantum Era
Jiao, L., Wu, W., Bai, S., & An, J. (2023) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300218 · Cited by 31
Optimal quantum channel estimation of two interacting qubits subject to decoherence
Zheng, Q., Yao, Y., & Li, Y. (2014) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2014-50047-1 · Cited by 28
Gour, G. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009560870.014 · Cited by 28
Subwavelength lithography over extended areas
Bjork, G. G., Sánchez-Soto, L. L., & Söderholm, J. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.013811 · Cited by 28
Sub-Shot-Noise Magnetometry with a Correlated Spin-Relaxation Dominated Alkali-Metal Vapor
Kominis, I. K. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.073002 · Cited by 28
Sub shot-noise interferometric phase sensitivity with beryllium ions Schrödinger cat states
Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2007) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/78/30004 · Cited by 29
Testolin, M. J., Hill, C. D., Wellard, C. J., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012302 · Cited by 28
Saturating the quantum Cramér–Rao bound using LOCC
Zhou, S., Zou, C.-L., & Jiang, L. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab71f8 · Cited by 29
Quantum Sensors for the Generating Functional of Interacting Quantum Field Theories
Bermúdez, A., Gert Aarts, A., & Müller, M. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.041012 · Cited by 28
Decoherence in Grover’s quantum algorithm: Perturbative approach
Azuma, H. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042311 · Cited by 27
Precision bounds in noisy quantum metrologyPreprint
Kołodyński, J. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0535 · Cited by 44
Toward Heisenberg scaling in non-Hermitian metrology at the quantum regime
Yu, X., Zhao, X., Li, L., Hu, X., Duan, X., Yuan, H., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk7616 · Cited by 26
Jahromi, H. R., & Franco, R. L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86461-2 · Cited by 27
Foss-Feig, M., Hazzard, K. R. A., Bollinger, J. J., Rey, A. M., & Clark, C. W. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113008 · Cited by 28
Thermodynamics of Quantum Feedback Cooling
Liuzzo-Scorpo, P., Correa, L. A., Schmidt, R., & Adesso, G. (2016) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e18020048 · Cited by 26
Validating and controlling quantum enhancement against noise by the motion of a qubit
Nosrati, F., Mortezapour, A., & Franco, R. L. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012331 · Cited by 26
Multiparameter quantum estimation under dephasing noise
Ho, L. B., Hakoshima, H., Matsuzaki, Y., Matsuzaki, M., & Kondo, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022602 · Cited by 26
Does large quantum Fisher information imply Bell correlations?
Fröwis, F., Fadel, M., Treutlein, P., Gisin, N., & Brunner, N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.040101 · Cited by 25
Decay of spin coherences in one-dimensional spin systems
Kaur, G., Ajoy, A., & Cappellaro, P. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/093035 · Cited by 25
Quantifying Dynamical Coherence with Dynamical Entanglement
Theurer, T., Satyajit, S., & Plenio, M. B. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.130401 · Cited by 26
Self-citationProtocols for estimating multiple functions with quantum sensor networks: Geometry and performance
Bringewatt, J., Boettcher, I., Niroula, P., Bienias, P., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033011 · Cited by 26
Entanglement dynamics of two qubits coupled individually to Ohmic baths
Duan, L., Wang, H., Chen, Q.-H., & Zhao, Y. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4816122 · Cited by 25
Quantum estimation of magnetic-field gradient using W-state
Ng, H. T., & Kim, K. (2014) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2014.06.048 · Cited by 26
Magnetic sensitivity and entanglement dynamics of the chemical compass
Kominis, I. K. (2012) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2012.06.014 · Cited by 26
Using quantum theory to improve measurement precision
Dunningham, J. (2006) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510601009871 · Cited by 25
Magnetic-field sensing with quantum error detection under the effect of energy relaxation
Matsuzaki, Y., & Benjamin, S. C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032303 · Cited by 25
Yousefjani, R., Nichols, R., Salimi, S., & Adesso, G. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062307 · Cited by 26
Constraining power of cosmological observables: Blind redshift spots and optimal ranges
Kazantzidis, L., Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.063537 · Cited by 25
Twin beam quantum-enhanced correlated interferometry for testing fundamental physics
Pradyumna, S. T., Losero, E., Berchera, I. R., Traina, P., Zucco, M. E., Jacobsen, C. S., Andersen, U. L., Degiovanni, I. P., Genovese, M., & Gehring, T. (2020) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-020-0368-5 · Cited by 31
Analysis of radiatively stable entanglement in a system of two dipole-interacting three-level atoms
Bargatin, I., Grishanin, B. A., & Zadkov, V. N. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052305 · Cited by 25
Introduction to quantum radarPreprint
Torromé, R. G., Bekhti-Winkel, N. B., & Knott, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14238 · Cited by 39
Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox with position–momentum entangled macroscopic twin beams
Kumar, A., Nirala, G., & Marino, A. M. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac1b69 · Cited by 24
Lian, Y.-J., & Liu, J. (2021) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac01e4 · Cited by 24
Brans-Dicke corrections to the gravitational Sagnac effect
Nandi, K. K., Alsing, P. M., Evans, J., & Nayak, T. B. (2001) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.084027 · Cited by 24
Generation of Mesoscopic Entangled States in a Cavity Coupled to an Atomic Ensemble
Nikoghosyan, G., Hartmann, M. J., & Plenio, M. B. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.123603 · Cited by 24
Self-citationEntangled and Sequential Quantum Protocols with Dephasing
Boixo, S., & Heunen, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.120402 · Cited by 25
Dephasing-assisted parameter estimation in the presence of dynamical decoupling
Tan, Q.-S., Huang, Y., Kuang, L., & Wang, X. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.063604 · Cited by 24
Ivanov, S. S., Vitanov, N. V., & Korolkova, N. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/023039 · Cited by 26
Achieving the Heisenberg limit with Dicke states in noisy quantum metrology
Saleem, Z. H., Perlin, M. A., Shaji, A., & Gray, S. K. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.052615 · Cited by 29
Quantum information processing and quantum control with trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J. (2009) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2009/t137/014007 · Cited by 24
Fourier-transform quantum phase estimation with quantum phase noise
Chapeau‐Blondeau, F., & Belin, É. (2019) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107441 · Cited by 26
Quantum remote sensing under the effect of dephasing
Okane, H., Hakoshima, H., Takeuchi, Y., Seki, Y., & Matsuzaki, Y. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062610 · Cited by 23
Practical limits of error correction for quantum metrology
Shettell, N., Munro, W. J., Markham, D., & Nemoto, K. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abf533 · Cited by 23
Hao, S.-Y., Xia, Y., Song, J., & An, N. B. (2013) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.30.000468 · Cited by 22
Environment-assisted Quantum-enhanced Sensing with Electronic Spins in Diamond
Cooper, A., Sun, W. K. C., Jaskula, J.-C., & Cappellaro, P. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.044047 · Cited by 22
Quantum metrology with generalized cat states
Tatsuta, M., Matsuzaki, Y., & Shimizu, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032318 · Cited by 24
Non-Markovian temperature sensing
Zhang, Z.-Z., & Wu, W. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043039 · Cited by 22
A clock synchronization method based on quantum entanglement
Shi, J., & Shen, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14087-z · Cited by 22
Dahbi, Z., Oumennana, M., Anouz, K. E., Mansour, M., & Allati, A. E. (2023) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-022-07963-z · Cited by 22
Optimal condition for measurement observable via error-propagation
Zhong, W., Lu, X.-M., Jing, X.-X., & Wang, X. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/38/385304 · Cited by 22
Wu, S.-X., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C.-S. (2018) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.01.004 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-11-17
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3865-3868
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2015876000
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Austrian Science Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- frequency standards, quantum entanglement, decoherence, Ramsey spectroscopy, two-level system, maximally entangled states, partially entangled states, optimal measurement, frequency resolution, quantum metrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
