The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Test of the Equivalence Principle for Gravitational Self-Energy
Abstract
The lunar-ranging test of the equivalence principle for gravitational self-energy is ambiguous. Although the Earth has more gravitational self-energy than the Moon, its sizable Fe/Ni core also gives it a different composition than the Moon. We removed this ambiguity by comparing, in effect, the accelerations of ``miniature'' earths and moons toward the Sun. Our composition-dependent Earth-Moon acceleration, $\ensuremath{\Delta}{a}_{\mathrm{CD}}/{a}_{\mathrm{s}}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}(+0.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}$, and lunar-ranging data provide an unambiguous test at the $1.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space
Khoury, J., & Weltman, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.171104 · Cited by 1,648
Khoury, J., & Weltman, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.044026 · Cited by 1,634
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Metadata
- Authors
- Baeßler, S., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Schmidt, U., & Swanson, H. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3585-3588
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2018757625
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Test of the Equivalence Principle for Gravitational Self-Energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.83.3585
- The paper
- Baeßler, S., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Schmidt, U., & Swanson, H. E. (1999). Improved Test of the Equivalence Principle for Gravitational Self-Energy. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.3585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.