Cited by 1,648Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space

Open access
Khoury, Justin, Weltman, Amanda·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present a novel scenario where a scalar field acquires a mass which depends on the local matter density: the field is massive on Earth, where the density is high, but is essentially free in the solar system, where the density is low. All existing tests of gravity are satisfied. We predict that near-future satellite experiments could measure an effective Newton's constant in space different from that on Earth, as well as violations of the equivalence principle stronger than currently allowed by laboratory experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.93.171104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chameleon field is an example of a field whose mass depends on the environment.

    “An example of a field with such a behavior is the aptly named chameleon field (Khoury and Weltman 2004b, a).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Khoury and Weltman 2004b

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khoury, J., & Weltman, A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-10-22
Volume
93
Issue
17
Pages
171104-171104
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2152565162
Cited by
1,648
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 96
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
chameleon field, scalar field mass, matter density dependence, tests of gravity, modified gravity, equivalence principle violation, effective Newton's constant, satellite experiments, solar system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review