Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Scheme for Two-Atom Entanglement and Quantum Information Processing in Cavity QED

Zheng, Shi-Biao, Guo, Guang-Can·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A scheme is proposed for the generation of two-atom maximally entangled states and realization of quantum logic gates and teleportation with cavity QED. The scheme does not require the transfer of quantum information between the atoms and cavity. In the scheme the cavity is only virtually excited and thus the requirement on the quality factor of the cavities is greatly loosened.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.85.2392

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 1,206

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, S.-B., & Guo, G.-C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-09-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
2392-2395
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1988633556
Cited by
1,206
References
33
FWCI
30.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Scheme for Two-Atom Entanglement and Quantum Information Processing in Cavity QED. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2392
The paper
Zheng, S.-B., & Guo, G.-C. (2000). Efficient Scheme for Two-Atom Entanglement and Quantum Information Processing in Cavity QED. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2392

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.