The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Black Holes Radiate Mainly on the Brane
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assuming the main channel is emission of particles on the brane leads to Γ_H ∼ 3.6×10^-4 64πG_D/(A_{D-2} r+^{D-1}) (D-3)^4/(D-2).
“To estimate the decay rate of the black hole, we will assume that the main channel is due to emission of particles on the brane [69,70], leading to”
From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [69]
Such dilaton models of gravity admit exactly solvable black hole solutions including semi-classical backreaction.
“Such dilaton models of gravity admit exactly solvable black hole solutions including semi-classical backreaction, e.g., [85][86][87][88].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
The Introduction and Detailed calculations discuss higher-dimensional black holes on a brane and their Hawking evaporation. Searches for dilaton gravity, exact solvability, and semiclassical backreaction found no passage addressing whether dilaton models admit the claimed solutions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- N. Arkani-Hamed, 1998, Phys. Lett. B, 429, 263, 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00466-3 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Arkani-Hamed, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 086004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086004 · DOI
- P. Argyres, 1998, Phys. Lett. B, 441, 96, 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01184-8 · DOI
- R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 1, 7, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Sánchez, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 18, 1030, 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1030 · DOI
- D. Page, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 198, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Page, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 3260, 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3260 · DOI
- R. Gregory, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2837, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2837 · DOI · Paper page
- R. Gregory, 1994, Nucl. Phys., B428, 399, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90206-2 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4690, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 3370, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 · DOI · Paper page
- A. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 065007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Giddings, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 3, 23, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/03/023 · DOI
- R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 1, 21, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vacuum metastability with black holes
Burda, P., Gregory, R., & Moss, I. G. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)114 · Cited by 144
Emparan, R., Gregory, R., & Santos, C. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.104022 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThree-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Emparan, R., Horowitz, G. T., & Myers, R. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-07-17
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-502
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
