Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Critical Coarsening without Surface Tension: The Universality Class of the Voter Model

Open access
Dornic, Ivan, Chaté, Hugues, Chave, Jérôme, Hinrichsen, Haye·2001·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that the two-dimensional voter model, usually considered to be only a marginal coarsening system, represents a broad class of models for which phase ordering takes place without surface tension. We argue that voter-like growth is generically observed at order-disorder nonequilibrium transitions solely driven by interfacial noise between dynamically symmetric absorbing states.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.87.045701

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Dornic, I., Chaté, H., Chave, J., & Hinrichsen, H.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2001-07-10
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
045701-045701
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1987142400
Cited by
375
References
0
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Coarsening without Surface Tension: The Universality Class of the Voter Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.87.045701
The paper
Dornic, I., Chaté, H., Chave, J., & Hinrichsen, H. (2001). Critical Coarsening without Surface Tension: The Universality Class of the Voter Model. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.045701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.