Cited by 135Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Maximally Entangled Mixed States: Creation and Concentration

Open access
Peters, Nicholas A., Altepeter, Joseph B., Branning, David, Jeffrey, Evan R., Wei, Tzu-Chieh, Kwiat, Paul G.·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Using correlated photons from parametric down-conversion, we extend the boundaries of experimentally accessible two-qubit Hilbert space. Specifically, we have created and characterized maximally entangled mixed states that lie above the Werner boundary in the linear entropy-tangle plane. In addition, we demonstrate that such states can be efficiently concentrated, simultaneously increasing both the purity and the degree of entanglement. We investigate a previously unsuspected sensitivity imbalance in common state measures, i.e., the tangle, linear entropy, and fidelity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.92.133601

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical linear optical devices exist (dichroic elements) that may generate nonphysical two-qubit quantum maps.

    “Surprisingly, we shall find that physical linear optical devices exist ͑dichroic elements͒ that may generate nonphysical two-qubit quantum maps ͓40͔.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [40]

    The experimental-arrangement passage (p. 2) describes physical glass elements that transmit one polarization more readily than the other, supporting the existence of polarization-dependent optical devices. The paper does not say that these elements generate nonphysical two-qubit quantum maps; that is the citing sentence’s additional claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]P. Kwiat et al. , quant-ph/0303040 (2003). · arXiv
  2. [29]A. J. Berglund, Dartmouth College B.A. Thesis, also quant-ph/0010001 (2000); N. Peters et al. , J. Quant. Inf. Comp. 3 , 503 (2003). · arXiv
  3. [30]As recently demonstrated [M. Barbieri, F. De Martini, G. Di Nepi, and P. Mataloni, quant-ph/0303018 (2003); G. Di Nepi, F. De Martini, M. Barbieri, and P. Mataloni, quant-ph/0307204 (2003)], one could instead use the spatial degree of freedom to induce decoherence; however, the states are then not suitable, e.g., for use in fiber optic systems, or where interference methods are needed. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, N. A., Altepeter, J. B., Branning, D., Jeffrey, E. R., Wei, T.-C., & Kwiat, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-04-02
Volume
92
Issue
13
Pages
133601-133601
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1980743183
Cited by
135
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
maximally entangled mixed states, two-qubit entanglement, Werner states, entanglement concentration, parametric down-conversion, correlated photons, linear entropy, tangles, fidelity, entanglement measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review