The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limit on the Present Temporal Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
Open accessAbstract
The comparison of different atomic transition frequencies over time can be used to determine the present value of the temporal derivative of the fine structure constant $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ in a model-independent way without assumptions on constancy or variability of other parameters, allowing tests of the consequences of unification theories. We have measured an optical transition frequency at 688 THz in $^{171}\mathrm{Y}\mathrm{b}^{+}$ with a cesium atomic clock at 2 times separated by 2.8 yr and find a value for the fractional variation of the frequency ratio ${f}_{\mathrm{Y}\mathrm{b}}/{f}_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{s}}$ of $(\ensuremath{-}1.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4.4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}\text{ }{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{r}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, consistent with zero. Combined with recently published values for the constancy of other transition frequencies this measurement sets an upper limit on the present variability of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ at the level of $2.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}\text{ }{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{r}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ $(1\ensuremath{\sigma})$, corresponding so far to the most stringent limit from laboratory experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Further evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra
Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K., & Flambaum, V. V. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06970.x · Cited by 514
The Oklo bound on the time variation of the fine-structure constant revisited
Damour, T., & Dyson, F. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00467-1 · Cited by 374
Srianand, R., Chand, H., Petitjean, P., & Aracil, B. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.121302 · Cited by 335
Search for Variations of Fundamental Constants using Atomic Fountain Clocks
Marion, H., Pereira Dos Santos, F., Abgrall, M., Zhang, S., Sortais, Y., Bize, S., Maksimovic, I., Calonico, D., Grünert, J., Mandache, C., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.150801 · Cited by 298
Direct test of the constancy of fundamental nuclear constants
SHLYAKHTER, A. I. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264340a0 · Cited by 269
Implications of gauge unification for time variation of the fine structure constant
Langacker, P., Segrè, G., & Strassler, M. J. (2002) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01189-9 · Cited by 193
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Nobel Lecture: Passion for precision
Hänsch, T. W. (2006) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.1297 · Cited by 915
Metadata
- Authors
- Peik, E., Lipphardt, B., Schnatz, H., Schneider, T., Tamm, C., & Karshenboim, S. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-10-18
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 170801-170801
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2145008602
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limit on the Present Temporal Variation of the Fine Structure Constant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.93.170801
- The paper
- Peik, E., Lipphardt, B., Schnatz, H., Schneider, T., Tamm, C., & Karshenboim, S. G. (2004). Limit on the Present Temporal Variation of the Fine Structure Constant. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.93.170801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.