Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,102

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion

Open access
Araki, T., Eguchi, K., Enomoto, S., Furuno, K., Ichimura, K., Ikeda, H., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Iwamoto, T., Kawashima, T., Kishimoto, Y., Koga, M., Koseki, Y., Maeda, T., Mitsui, T., Motoki, M., Nakajima, K., Ogawa, H., Owada, K., Ricol, J.-S., Shimizu, I., Shirai, J., Suekane, F., Suzuki, A., Tada, K., Tajima, O., Tamae, K., Tsuda, Y., Watanabe, H., Busenitz, J., Classen, T., Djurcic, Z., Keefer, G., McKinny, K., Mei, D.-M., Piepke, A., Yakushev, E., Berger, B. E., Chan, Y. D., Decowski, M. P., Dwyer, D. A., Freedman, S. J., Fu, Y., Fujikawa, B. K., Goldman, J., Gray, F., Heeger, K. M., Lesko, K. T., Luk, K.-B., Murayama, H., Poon, A. W. P., Steiner, H. M., Winslow, L. A., Horton-Smith, G. A., Mauger, C., McKeown, R. D., Vogel, P., Lane, C. E., Miletic, T., Gorham, P. W., Guillian, G., Learned, J. G., Maricic, J., Matsuno, S., Pakvasa, S., Dazeley, S., Hatakeyama, S., Rojas, A., Svoboda, R., Dieterle, B. D., Detwiler, J., Gratta, G., Ishii, K., Tolich, N., Uchida, Y., Batygov, M., Bugg, W., Efremenko, Y., Kamyshkov, Y., Kozlov, A., Nakamura, Y., Gould, C. R., Karwowski, H. J., Markoff, D. M., Messimore, J. A., Nakamura, K., Rohm, R. M., Tornow, W., Wendell, R., Young, A. R., Chen, M.-J., Wang, Y.-F., Piquemal, F.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present results of a study of neutrino oscillation based on a 766 ton/year exposure of KamLAND to reactor antineutrinos. We observe 258 ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ candidate events with energies above 3.4 MeV compared to $365.2\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}23.7$ events expected in the absence of neutrino oscillation. Accounting for $17.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7.3$ expected background events, the statistical significance for reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ disappearance is 99.998%. The observed energy spectrum disagrees with the expected spectral shape in the absence of neutrino oscillation at 99.6% significance and prefers the distortion expected from ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ oscillation effects. A two-neutrino oscillation analysis of the KamLAND data gives $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}^{2}={7.9}_{\ensuremath{-}0.5}^{+0.6}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}}^{2}$. A global analysis of data from KamLAND and solar-neutrino experiments yields $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}^{2}={7.9}_{\ensuremath{-}0.5}^{+0.6}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}}^{2}$ and ${tan}^{2}\ensuremath{\theta}={0.40}_{\ensuremath{-}0.07}^{+0.10}$, the most precise determination to date.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.94.081801

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,102

Metadata

Authors
Araki, T., Eguchi, K., Enomoto, S., Furuno, K., Ichimura, K., Ikeda, H., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Iwamoto, T., Kawashima, T., Kishimoto, Y., Koga, M., Koseki, Y., Maeda, T., Mitsui, T., Motoki, M., Nakajima, K., Ogawa, H., Owada, K., Ricol, J.-S., Shimizu, I., Shirai, J., Suekane, F., Suzuki, A., Tada, K., Tajima, O., Tamae, K., Tsuda, Y., Watanabe, H., Busenitz, J., Classen, T., Djurcic, Z., Keefer, G., McKinny, K., Mei, D.-M., Piepke, A., Yakushev, E., Berger, B. E., Chan, Y. D., Decowski, M. P., Dwyer, D. A., Freedman, S. J., Fu, Y., Fujikawa, B. K., Goldman, J., Gray, F., Heeger, K. M., Lesko, K. T., Luk, K.-B., Murayama, H., Poon, A. W. P., Steiner, H. M., Winslow, L. A., Horton-Smith, G. A., Mauger, C., McKeown, R. D., Vogel, P., Lane, C. E., Miletic, T., Gorham, P. W., Guillian, G., Learned, J. G., Maricic, J., Matsuno, S., Pakvasa, S., Dazeley, S., Hatakeyama, S., Rojas, A., Svoboda, R., Dieterle, B. D., Detwiler, J., Gratta, G., Ishii, K., Tolich, N., Uchida, Y., Batygov, M., Bugg, W., Efremenko, Y., Kamyshkov, Y., Kozlov, A., Nakamura, Y., Gould, C. R., Karwowski, H. J., Markoff, D. M., Messimore, J. A., Nakamura, K., Rohm, R. M., Tornow, W., Wendell, R., Young, A. R., Chen, M.-J., Wang, Y.-F., & Piquemal, F.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
081801-081801
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2150698091
Cited by
1,102
References
0
FWCI
87.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.94.081801
The paper
Araki, T., Eguchi, K., Enomoto, S., Furuno, K., Ichimura, K., Ikeda, H., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Iwamoto, T., Kawashima, T., Kishimoto, Y., Koga, M., Koseki, Y., Maeda, T., Mitsui, T., Motoki, M., Nakajima, K., Ogawa, H., Owada, K., . . . Piquemal, F. (2005). Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.081801

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.