Cited by 630Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Inflationary Prediction for Primordial Non-Gaussianity

Open access
Lyth, David H., Rodríguez, Yeinzon·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We extend the deltaN formalism so that it gives all of the stochastic properties of the primordial curvature perturbation zeta if the initial field perturbations are Gaussian. The calculation requires only the knowledge of some family of unperturbed universes. A formula is given for the normalization f(NL) of the bispectrum of zeta, which is the main signal of non-Gaussianity. Examples of the use of the formula are given, and its relation to cosmological perturbation theory is explained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.95.121302

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar cases with canonical kinetic terms were previously studied in [38], where they were shown not to generate significant non-Gaussianity.

    “Similar cases with canonical kinetic terms were previously studied in [38], where it was shown that they do not generate significant non-Gaussianity.”

    From Spectral running and non-Gaussianity from slow-roll inflation in generalized two-field models (2007) · cites this paper as [38]

    The two-component inflation-model example (p. 3) finds non-Gaussianity too small to observe, supporting the claim for that case. But another two-component model (p. 4) can yield |f_NL| > 1 under specified conditions. The paper therefore does not support the unqualified statement that similar cases do not generate significant non-Gaussianity; the passages also do not identify the models by their kinetic terms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In previous work [38], for theories with canonical kinetic terms and a sum potential, f_NL ≈ 1/N.

    “In previous work, [38], for theories with canonical kinetic terms and a sum potential, f NL ≈ 1/N .”

    From Spectral running and non-Gaussianity from slow-roll inflation in generalized two-field models (2007) · cites this paper as [38]

    In “A two-component inflation model” (p. 3), the paper gives N ∝ |θc/θ| and f_NL ≃ |θ/θc|, implying f_NL ∝ 1/N for that particular model. It does not establish the claimed result generally for theories with canonical kinetic terms and a sum potential; its other two-component example (p. 4) instead discusses conditions yielding |f_NL| > 1. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The definition of N as the volume expansion rate of the t=const hypersurface holds also at second or higher order in cosmological perturbations.

    “This definition is not restricted to linear theory but holds also at second or higher order in the cosmological perturbations [32, 33, 18, 21].”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [21]

  • When b(φ) = 0, the calculation of f(4)_NL simplifies and the result is identical to that found in [38].

    “When b(ϕ) = 0, this calculation of f (4) NL simplifies, since B S = C S = G = H = 0, α u = α v = 1, (4.29) and the result is identical to that found in [38].”

    From Spectral running and non-Gaussianity from slow-roll inflation in generalized two-field models (2007) · cites this paper as [38]

    The bispectrum discussion (p. 2) says the paper calculates f_NL, but our copy does not decode the resulting formula. Searches for b(φ) and the named terms did not find the b(φ)=0 simplification, so the claimed identity between the two results cannot be checked from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyth, D. H., & Rodríguez, Y.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Universidad Antonio Nariño (CO)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-09-16
Volume
95
Issue
12
Pages
121302-121302
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1977668606
Cited by
630
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 42
FWCI
21.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
primordial non-Gaussianity, inflation (cosmology), curvature perturbations, bispectrum, cosmological perturbation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review