The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Quantum Communication without a Shared Reference Frame
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A spectrum analyzer is capable of measuring the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components.
“In this direction, a spectrum analyzer is a device capable to measure the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components [48,52,[69][70][71][72][73][74].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
The indexed passages (labeled Abstract; page not provided) describe polarization-based quantum key distribution and measurements of photon states. Searches for an OAM spectrum analyzer and for measurements of OAM-mode power and phase found no passage addressing the claimed capability. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSpiral wave plates are an efficient tool to produce and manipulate OAM states.
“An efficient tool is provided by spiral wave plates [47,48], whose thickness increases in a transparent spiral structure so that light experiences a phase gradient during the propagation.”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/419450a · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.150501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.1738173 · DOI
- 10.1143/JJAP.43.L1217 · DOI
- 10.1049/el:19950153 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121 · DOI
- 10.1080/095003400148367 · DOI
- 10.1080/095003400148358 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4737 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.118224 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.087901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.220501 · DOI
- 10.1137/0217014 · DOI
- R. Renner, 2005, Theory of Cryptography-TCC 2005
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022320 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11080-005-5723-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., & Spekkens, R. W. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.555 · Cited by 827
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Li, Y.-P., Chen, W., Wang, F.-X., Yin, Z.-Q., Zhang, L., Liu, H., Wang, S., He, D.-Y., Zhou, Z., Guo, G.-C., et al. (2019) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.44.004523 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, T.-Y., Zhang, J., Boileau, J.-C., Jin, X.-M., Yang, B., Zhang, Q., Yang, T., Laflamme, R., & Pan, J.-W.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-04-21
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 15
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
