Cited by 16Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Methods and Outcomes

Increasing the effectiveness of active learning using deliberate practice: A homework transformation

Open access
Miller, Kelly, Callaghan, Kristina, McCarty, Logan S., Deslauriers, Louis·2021·Physical Review Physics Education Research

Abstract

We show how learning can be improved, beyond that shown in actively taught classrooms, by also transforming the homework using the principles of deliberate practice.We measure the impact of transforming the homework on student learning in a course that had already implemented an active approach to teaching in class.We compare performance on the same final exam in equivalent cohorts of students over three semesters of an introductory physics course: the first taught with traditional lectures and traditional homework, the second taught with active instruction coupled with traditional homework, and the last taught with both active instruction and transformed homework.We find students in the semester where both active teaching and transformed homework are used scored significantly higher on the final exam than the students taught actively but with traditional homework.This learning gain achieved by transforming the homework is comparable to that achieved by replacing traditional lectures with active teaching strategies in class.We further show the positive effects of transforming the homework on student learning through a shorter, controlled experiment.When everything but the homework implementation is controlled, students scored 5%-10% higher on a test of learning following transformed homework compared with traditional homework.This significant improvement to learning occurs despite students spending a similar amount of time on task.This study represents an initial step towards understanding how deliberate practice can be extended to improve pedagogy beyond what happens in the classroom to the out-of-class homework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.010129

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K., Callaghan, K., McCarty, L. S., & Deslauriers, L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Deslauriers, Louis
Venue
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2021-04-23
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
2469-9896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158437475
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Physics Education Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Harvard University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
deliberate practice, active learning, introductory physics education, learning outcomes, exam performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review