Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 505

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ab initio solution of the many-electron Schrödinger equation with deep neural networks

Open access
Pfau, David, Spencer, James S., Matthews, Alexander G. D. G., Foulkes, W. M. C.·2020·Physical Review Research

Abstract

Given access to accurate solutions of the many-electron Schrödinger equation, nearly all chemistry could be derived from first principles.Exact wave functions of interesting chemical systems are out of reach because they are NP-hard to compute in general, but approximations can be found using polynomially scaling algorithms.The key challenge for many of these algorithms is the choice of wave function approximation, or Ansatz, which must trade off between efficiency and accuracy.Neural networks have shown impressive power as accurate practical function approximators and promise as a compact wave-function Ansatz for spin systems, but problems in electronic structure require wave functions that obey Fermi-Dirac statistics.Here we introduce a novel deep learning architecture, the Fermionic neural network, as a powerful wave-function Ansatz for many-electron systems.The Fermionic neural network is able to achieve accuracy beyond other variational quantum Monte Carlo Ansatz on a variety of atoms and small molecules.Using no data other than atomic positions and charges, we predict the dissociation curves of the nitrogen molecule and hydrogen chain, two challenging strongly correlated systems, to significantly higher accuracy than the coupled cluster method, widely considered the most accurate scalable method for quantum chemistry at equilibrium geometry.This demonstrates that deep neural networks can improve the accuracy of variational quantum Monte Carlo to the point where it outperforms other ab initio quantum chemistry methods, opening the possibility of accurate direct optimization of wave functions for previously intractable many-electron systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033429

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. A. Krizhevsky, 2012, Neural Information Processing Systems
  2. J. Gilmer, 2017, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
  3. 10.1038/s41467-019-12875-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.042113 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.5088393 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/andp.19273892002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1063/1.3407895 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.33 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130201 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.167204 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250501 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012039 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401 · DOI
  18. 10.7566/JPSJ.87.074002 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108929 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.115106 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.205302 · DOI
  22. S. Zhang, 2018, Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling
  23. A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
  24. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1063/1.5019779 · DOI · Paper page
  26. J. Shawe-Taylor, 1989, First IEE International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Conf. Publ. No. 313, London, UK
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3649 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1063/1.3665391 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.045103 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00648 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00648
  31. 10.1039/C9CP02269D · DOI
  32. 10.1063/1.5125803 · DOI
  33. J. Martens, 2015, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
  34. 10.1162/089976698300017746 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4558 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1063/1.2437215 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1063/1.3554625 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022503 · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.022503
  39. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00303-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1063/1.471865 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/00268976.2016.1149630 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2016.1149630
  42. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00393 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00393
  43. 10.1063/1.1319643 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01005 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01005
  45. 10.1021/cr2001417 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1063/1.2354502 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01392-4 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031059 · DOI
  49. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/7/074202 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/7/074202
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3350 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/wcms.1340 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1063/1.457480 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1063/1.465195 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.066706 · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.066706
  55. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1021/ct400250u · DOI
  57. 10.1063/1.462652 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1063/1.473863 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1063/1.531535 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1063/1.4755992 · DOI
  61. M. B. Giles, 2008, Advances in Automatic Differentiation
  62. 10.1063/1.477422 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/s41467-020-15724-9 · DOI

Cited by

See all 505

Metadata

Authors
Pfau, D., Spencer, J. S., Matthews, A. G. D. G., & Foulkes, W. M. C.
Venue
Physical Review Research
Published
2020-09-16
Volume
2
Issue
3
ISSN
2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972153210
Cited by
505
References
4
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.