The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ab initio solution of the many-electron Schrödinger equation with deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Given access to accurate solutions of the many-electron Schrödinger equation, nearly all chemistry could be derived from first principles.Exact wave functions of interesting chemical systems are out of reach because they are NP-hard to compute in general, but approximations can be found using polynomially scaling algorithms.The key challenge for many of these algorithms is the choice of wave function approximation, or Ansatz, which must trade off between efficiency and accuracy.Neural networks have shown impressive power as accurate practical function approximators and promise as a compact wave-function Ansatz for spin systems, but problems in electronic structure require wave functions that obey Fermi-Dirac statistics.Here we introduce a novel deep learning architecture, the Fermionic neural network, as a powerful wave-function Ansatz for many-electron systems.The Fermionic neural network is able to achieve accuracy beyond other variational quantum Monte Carlo Ansatz on a variety of atoms and small molecules.Using no data other than atomic positions and charges, we predict the dissociation curves of the nitrogen molecule and hydrogen chain, two challenging strongly correlated systems, to significantly higher accuracy than the coupled cluster method, widely considered the most accurate scalable method for quantum chemistry at equilibrium geometry.This demonstrates that deep neural networks can improve the accuracy of variational quantum Monte Carlo to the point where it outperforms other ab initio quantum chemistry methods, opening the possibility of accurate direct optimization of wave functions for previously intractable many-electron systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 · Cited by 2,215
Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks
Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13890 · Cited by 1,445
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- A. Krizhevsky, 2012, Neural Information Processing Systems
- J. Gilmer, 2017, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
- 10.1038/s41467-019-12875-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.042113 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5088393 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/andp.19273892002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3407895 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.33 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130201 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.167204 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012039 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401 · DOI
- 10.7566/JPSJ.87.074002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108929 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.115106 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.205302 · DOI
- S. Zhang, 2018, Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling
- A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.5019779 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Shawe-Taylor, 1989, First IEE International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Conf. Publ. No. 313, London, UK
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3649 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3665391 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.045103 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00648 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00648
- 10.1039/C9CP02269D · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5125803 · DOI
- J. Martens, 2015, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
- 10.1162/089976698300017746 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4558 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.2437215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3554625 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022503 · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.022503
- 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00303-1 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.471865 · DOI
- 10.1080/00268976.2016.1149630 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2016.1149630
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00393 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00393
- 10.1063/1.1319643 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01005 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01005
- 10.1021/cr2001417 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.2354502 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01392-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031059 · DOI
- 10.1088/0953-8984/22/7/074202 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/7/074202
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3350 · DOI
- 10.1002/wcms.1340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.457480 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.465195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.066706 · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.066706
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ct400250u · DOI
- 10.1063/1.462652 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.473863 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.531535 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.4755992 · DOI
- M. B. Giles, 2008, Advances in Automatic Differentiation
- 10.1063/1.477422 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15724-9 · DOI
Cited by
Physics-informed machine learning
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · Cited by 8,718
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Unbiasing time-dependent Variational Monte Carlo by projected quantum evolution
Sinibaldi, A., Giuliani, C., Carleo, G., & Vicentini, F. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-10-1131 · Cited by 51
Investigating topological order using recurrent neural networks
Hibat-Allah, M., Melko, R. G., & Carrasquilla, J. (2023) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.075152 · Cited by 27
Spiers Memorial Lecture: Quantum chemistry, classical heuristics, and quantum advantage
Chan, G. K.-L. (2024) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/d4fd00141a · Cited by 20
Active learning of neural network potentials for rare events
(2024) · doi:10.1039/d3dd00216k · Cited by 20
Neural network approach to quasiparticle dispersions in doped antiferromagnets
Lange, H., Döschl, F., Carrasquilla, J., & Bohrdt, A. (2024) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01678-7 · Cited by 18
Impact of conditional modelling for a universal autoregressive quantum state
Bortone, M., Rath, Y., & Booth, G. H. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-08-1245 · Cited by 12
Fine-tuning neural network quantum states
Rende, R., Goldt, S., Becca, F., & Viteritti, L. L. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043280 · Cited by 10
Artificial neural network encoding of molecular wavefunctions for quantum computing
Hagai, M., Sugiyama, M., Tsuda, K., & Yanai, T. (2023) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d2dd00093h · Cited by 5
Enhancing high-fidelity neural network potentials through low-fidelity sampling
Jung, G. S. (2024) · APL Machine Learning · doi:10.1063/5.0222779 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfau, D., Spencer, J. S., Matthews, A. G. D. G., & Foulkes, W. M. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review Research
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-09-16
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972153210
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.