Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms

Open access
LeBlanc, J. P. F., Antipov, Andrey E., Becca, Federico, Bulik, Ireneusz W., Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic, Chung, Chia-Min, Deng, Youjin, Ferrero, Michel, Henderson, Thomas M., Jiménez-Hoyos, Carlos A., Kozik, E., Liu, Xuan-Wen, Millis, Andrew J., Prokof’ev, N. V., Qin, Mingpu, Scuseria, Gustavo E., Shi, Hao, Svistunov, B. V., Tocchio, Luca F., Tupitsyn, I. S., White, Steven R., Zhang, Shiwei, Zheng, Bo-Xiao, Zhu, Zhenyue, Gull, Emanuel, Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem·2015·Physical Review X

Abstract

Numerical results for ground-state and excited-state properties (energies, double occupancies, and Matsubara-axis self-energies) of the single-orbital Hubbard model on a two-dimensional square lattice are presented, in order to provide an assessment of our ability to compute accurate results in the thermodynamic limit. Many methods are employed, including auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo, bare and bold-line diagrammatic Monte Carlo, method of dual fermions, density matrix embedding theory, density matrix renormalization group, dynamical cluster approximation, diffusion Monte Carlo within a fixed-node approximation, unrestricted coupled cluster theory, and multireference projected Hartree-Fock methods. Comparison of results obtained by different methods allows for the identification of uncertainties and systematic errors. The importance of extrapolation to converged thermodynamic-limit values is emphasized. Cases where agreement between different methods is obtained establish benchmark results that may be useful in the validation of new approaches and the improvement of existing methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevx.5.041041

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
LeBlanc, J. P. F., Antipov, A. E., Becca, F., Bulik, I. W., Chan, G. K.-L., Chung, C.-M., Deng, Y., Ferrero, M., Henderson, T. M., Jiménez-Hoyos, C. A., Kozik, E., Liu, X.-W., Millis, A. J., Prokof’ev, N. V., Qin, M., Scuseria, G. E., Shi, H., Svistunov, B. V., Tocchio, L. F., Tupitsyn, I. S., White, S. R., Zhang, S., Zheng, B.-X., Zhu, Z., Gull, E., & Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem
Venue
Physical Review X
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
5
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3308
OpenAlex
W3098757053
Cited by
601
References
107
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevx.5.041041
The paper
LeBlanc, J. P. F., Antipov, A. E., Becca, F., Bulik, I. W., Chan, G. K.-L., Chung, C.-M., Deng, Y., Ferrero, M., Henderson, T. M., Jiménez-Hoyos, C. A., Kozik, E., Liu, X.-W., Millis, A. J., Prokof’ev, N. V., Qin, M., Scuseria, G. E., Shi, H., Svistunov, B. V., Tocchio, L. F., . . . Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem. (2015). Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms. Physical Review X. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.5.041041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.