Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Unsupervised Domain Classification of AlphaFold2-Predicted Protein Structures

Open access
Barone, Federico, Laio, Alessandro, Punta, Marco, Cozzini, Stefano, Ansuini, Alessio, Cazzaniga, Alberto·2025·PRX Life

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The release of the AlphaFold database, which contains 214 million predicted protein structures, represents a major leap forward for proteomics and its applications. However, the lack of comprehensive protein annotation limits its accessibility and usability. Here, we present DPCstruct, an unsupervised clustering algorithm designed to provide domain-level classification of protein structures. Using structural predictions from AlphaFold2 and comprehensive all-against-all local alignments from Foldseek, DPCstruct identifies and groups recurrent structural motifs into domain clusters. When applied to the Foldseek Cluster database, a representative set of proteins from the AlphaFoldDB, DPCstruct successfully recovers the majority of protein folds catalogued in established databases such as SCOP and CATH. Out of the 28 246 clusters identified by DPCstruct, 24% have no structural or sequence similarity to known protein families. Supported by a modular and efficient implementation, classifying 15 million entries in less than 48 h, DPCstruct is well suited for large-scale proteomics and metagenomics applications. It also facilitates the rapid incorporation of updates from the latest structural prediction tools, ensuring that the classification remains up-to-date. The DPCstruct pipeline and associated database are freely available in a dedicated repository, enhancing the navigation of the AlphaFoldDB through domain annotations and enabling rapid classification of other protein datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/prxlife.3.023009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barone, F., Laio, A., Punta, M., Cozzini, S., Ansuini, A., & Cazzaniga, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • AREA Science Park (IT)
Corresponding author
Barone, Federico
Venue
PRX Life
Published
2025-05-27
Volume
3
Issue
2
ISSN
2835-8279 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410775456
Cited by
3
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PRX Life (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NextGenerationEU (CI IR0000028, CUP J97G22000400006)
  • National Recovery and Resilience Plan
  • IGA Technology Services LLC
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein domain classification, AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, unsupervised clustering, structural motifs, protein fold, Foldseek, SCOP, CATH, protein annotation, metagenomics, proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review