Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Limits on The Photon Mass
Abstract
We give a review of methods used to set a limit on the mass $\ensuremath{\mu}$ of the photon. Direct tests for frequency dependence of the speed of light are discussed, along with more sensitive techniques which test Coulomb's Law and its analog in magnetostatics. The link between dynamic and static implications of finite $\ensuremath{\mu}$ is deduced from a set of postulates that make Proca's equations the unique generalization of Maxwell's. We note one hallowed postulate, that of energy conservation, which may be tested severely using pulsar signals. We present the merits of the old methods and of possible new experiments, and discuss other physical implications of finite $\ensuremath{\mu}$. A simple theorem is proved: For an experiment confined in dimensions D, effects of finite $\ensuremath{\mu}$ are of order ${(\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{D})}^{2}$---there is no "resonance" as the oscillation frequency $\ensuremath{\omega}$ approaches $\ensuremath{\mu}$ ($\ensuremath{\hbar}=c=1$). The best results from past experiments are (a) terrestrial measurements of $c$ at different frequencies $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\le}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}43}\mathrm{g}\ensuremath{\equiv}7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\equiv}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10} \mathrm{eV}$ (b) measurements of radio dispersion in pulsar signals (whistler effect) $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\le}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}44}\mathrm{g}\ensuremath{\equiv}3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}7}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\equiv}6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12} \mathrm{eV}$ (c) laboratory tests of Coulomb's law $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\le}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}47}\mathrm{g}\ensuremath{\equiv}6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\equiv}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}14} \mathrm{eV}$ (d) limits on a constant "external" magnetic field at the earth's surface $\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\le}4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}48}\mathrm{g}\ensuremath{\equiv}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\equiv}3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15} \mathrm{eV}.$ Observations of the Galactic magnetic field could improve the limit dramatically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe.
“Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching to a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe [59-61].”
From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [60]
According to [60], the practical impossibility for longitudinal photons to get equally partitioned with transverse photons in energy is due to the very large skin depth of longitudinal photons compared to that of transverse photons (with a ratio ≥ ω^2/m_A^2).
“According to [60], the practical impossibility for longitudinal photons to get equally partitioned with transverse photons in energy is due to the very large skin depth of longitudinal photons compared to that of transverse photons (with a ratio ≥ ω 2 /m 2 A ) [62, 63].”
From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Limits on a Lorentz- and parity-violating modification of electrodynamics
Carroll, S. M., Field, G. B., & Jackiw, R. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.1231 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Photon and graviton mass limits
Goldhaber, A. S., & Nieto, M. M. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.939 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationTu, L.-C., Luo, J., & Gillies, G. T. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/1/r02 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Electrodynamics on cosmological scales
Li, L.-X. (2016) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-016-2028-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- GOLDHABER, A. S., & NIETO, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1971-07-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-296
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981244962
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- photon mass, modified gravity, magnetostatics, Proca equation, energy conservation (physics), radio wave propagation, extra dimensions, Lorentz violation, Lorentz invariance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review