Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 527

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resonance ionization spectroscopy and one-atom detection

Hurst, G. S., Payne, M. G., Kramer, S. D., Young, J. P.·1979·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Resonance ionization spectroscopy, RIS, is a multistep photon absorption process in which the final state is the ionization continuum of an atom. The RIS process can be saturated with available pulsed lasers, so that one electron can be removed from each atom of the selected type. This method was first applied to the determination of the absolute number of He($2^{1}S$) excited states produced when pulsed beams of protons interacted with helium gas. Laser schemes for RIS are classified into five basic types; with these, nearly all of the elements can be detected with commercially available lasers. A periodic table is included showing schemes applicable to all of the elements except He, Ne, F, and Ar. A compact theory of the RIS process is presented which delineates the conditions under which rate equations apply. Questions on the effects of collisional line broadening, laser coherence time, and nonresonant multiphoton ionization processes are discussed. The initial demonstration of one-atom detection of Cs is described. By using laser beams to saturate the RIS process and by using proportional counters as single-electron detectors, one-atom detection is made possible. With RIS, one-atom detection is highly selective, has the ultimate in sensitivity, and has excellent space and time resolution. Furthermore, a modification of the technique in which single electrons (or single ions) are detected with a channel electron multiplier permits single-atom detection in a vacuum. Resonance ionization spectroscopy has application to classical phenomena such as the diffusion of free atoms, the chemical reaction of free atoms with a gas, the measurement of concentration fluctuations in a dilute vapor, and a variety of other atomic fluctuation phenomena. The authors describe how RIS can be used for photophysics measurements such as far wing collisional line broadening, measurements of photoionization cross sections for excited states, and collisional redistribution among excited states. Modern applications include the detection of single atoms in individual ionization tracks, such as those created by the binary fission of a parent atom, and the extension of this technique to the detection of stable or unstable daughter atoms in time coincidence with the decay of a parent atom. These methods are beig developed for use in low-level counting to determine, for example, the flux of solar neutrinos on the earth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.51.767

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 527

Metadata

Authors
Hurst, G. S., Payne, M. G., Kramer, S. D., & Young, J. P.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1979-10-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
767-819
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987195081
Cited by
527
References
19
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resonance ionization spectroscopy and one-atom detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.51.767
The paper
Hurst, G. S., Payne, M. G., Kramer, S. D., & Young, J. P. (1979). Resonance ionization spectroscopy and one-atom detection. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.51.767

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.