The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution and explosion of massive stars
Abstract
Like all true stars, massive stars are gravitationally confined thermonuclear reactors whose composition evolves as energy is lost to radiation and neutrinos. Unlike lower-mass stars $(M\ensuremath{\lesssim}{8M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}),$ however, no point is ever reached at which a massive star can be fully supported by electron degeneracy. Instead, the center evolves to ever higher temperatures, fusing ever heavier elements until a core of iron is produced. The collapse of this iron core to a neutron star releases an enormous amount of energy, a tiny fraction of which is sufficient to explode the star as a supernova. The authors examine our current understanding of the lives and deaths of massive stars, with special attention to the relevant nuclear and stellar physics. Emphasis is placed upon their post-helium-burning evolution. Current views regarding the supernova explosion mechanism are reviewed, and the hydrodynamics of supernova shock propagation and ``fallback'' is discussed. The calculated neutron star masses, supernova light curves, and spectra from these model stars are shown to be consistent with observations. During all phases, particular attention is paid to the nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Such stars are capable of producing, with few exceptions, the isotopes between mass 16 and 88 as well as a large fraction of still heavier elements made by the $r$ and $p$ processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Self-citationPrimordial nucleosynthesis: theory and observations
Olive, K. A., Steigman, G., & Walker, T. P. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00031-4 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., Bildsten, L., Blinnikov, S., Duffell, P., Farmer, R., Goldberg, J. A., Marchant, P., Sorokina, E., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 · Cited by 2,121
The Supernova–Gamma-Ray Burst Connection
Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150558 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationEvolution of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Herwig, F. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · Cited by 1,051
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
Galactic Evolution of Sr, Y, and Zr: A Multiplicity of Nucleosynthetic Processes
Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., & Sneden, C. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/380507 · Cited by 635
Metadata
- Authors
- Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1015-1071
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2063437365
- Cited by
- 2,247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution and explosion of massive stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015
- The paper
- Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002). The evolution and explosion of massive stars. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.