Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Andreev–Saint-James reflections: A probe of cuprate superconductors

Open access
Deutscher, Guy·2005·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Electrical transport through a normal-metal/superconductor contact at biases smaller than the energy gap can occur via the reflection of an electron as a hole of opposite wave vector. The same mechanism of electron-hole reflection gives rise to low-energy states at the surface of unconventional superconductors having nodes in their order parameter. The occurrence of electron-hole reflections at normal-metal/superconductor interfaces was predicted independently by Saint-James and de Gennes and by Andreev, and their spectroscopic features were discussed in detail by Saint-James in the early sixties. They are generally called Andreev reflections but, in view of the literature, will here be referred to as Andreev--Saint-James (ASJ) reflections. This review presents a historical review of ASJ reflections and spectroscopy in conventional superconductors, and reviews their application to the high-${T}_{c}$ cuprates. The occurrence of ASJ reflections in all studied cuprates is well documented for a broad range of doping levels, implying that there is no large asymmetry between electrons and holes near the Fermi level in the superconducting state. In the underdoped regime, where the pseudogap phenomenon has been observed by other methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), angular-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), and Giaever tunneling, gap values obtained from ASJ spectroscopy are smaller than pseudogap values, indicating a lack of coherence in the pseudogap energy range. Low-energy surface bound states have been observed in all studied hole-doped cuprates, in agreement with a dominant $d$-wave symmetry order parameter. Results are mixed for electron-doped cuprates. In overdoped $\mathrm{Y}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}(\ensuremath{\delta}<0.08)$ and ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$, ASJ spectroscopy is consistent with the presence of an additional imaginary component of the order parameter. Results of ASJ spectroscopy under applied magnetic fields are also reviewed. A short section at the end is devoted to some recent results on spin effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.77.109

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Deutscher, G.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2005-03-23
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
109-135
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2085309874
Cited by
381
References
45
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Andreev–Saint-James reflections: A probe of cuprate superconductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.77.109
The paper
Deutscher, G. (2005). Andreev–Saint-James reflections: A probe of cuprate superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.77.109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.