The DOI matches its Crossref record; 392 of the 398 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 172 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantum simulation
Open accessAbstract
Simulating quantum mechanics is known to be a difficult computational problem, especially when dealing with large systems. However, this difficulty may be overcome by using some controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation. Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in, e.g., condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry, and cosmology. Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control, and therefore, would be easier to construct. A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins, and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators. This review outlines the main theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum simulation and emphasizes some of the challenges and promises of this fast-growing field.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys quantum simulation—using controllable quantum systems to emulate less accessible quantum systems—covering digital and analog approaches, physical platforms, resource requirements, and applications. It argues that practical quantum simulators may be realized before full-scale quantum computers, with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions currently among the most advanced platforms.
Key findings
- Classical simulation of quantum systems scales exponentially: representing the state of 40 spin-1/2 particles requires \(2^{40} \approx 10^{12}\) numbers, about \(3.2 \times 10^{13}\) bits or 4 TB in single precision, while 80 spins would require about \(3.8 \times 10^{25}\) bits.
- Quantum simulators can store this information more compactly: the state of 40 spin-1/2 particles that needs a 4 TB classical register can be represented by a 40-qubit register.
- Resource estimates for digital quantum simulation (DQS) of chemical dynamics suggest that outperforming current classical computers would require at least 100 qubits and over 200,000 quantum gates per step; for molecular hydrogen, a precision of \(\pm 10^{-4} E_h\) was achieved with about 522 gates.
- Experimentally, the most advanced DQS has been realized with trapped ions, simulating spin models with up to six spins and one experiment requiring sequences of more than 100 quantum gates; neutral atoms in optical lattices are described as the most advanced platform for analog quantum simulation (AQS), with hundreds of ions used in a two-dimensional ion array for a spin-system simulation.
Methods
- This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes theoretical and experimental literature on quantum simulation.
- It organizes the field into digital quantum simulation, analog quantum simulation, and quantum-information-inspired classical algorithms, and discusses resource estimation, fault tolerance, physical realizations, and applications.
- The paper reviews platforms including neutral atoms, trapped ions, polar molecules, nuclear and electronic spins, superconducting circuits, photons, and other systems, with applications in condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, cosmology, atomic physics, quantum chemistry, open quantum systems, nuclear physics, and interferometry.
Limitations
- The paper states that given the breadth of topics, not all technical details can be provided and directs readers to references; it also notes that initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.
- The paper states that resource estimation for AQS has not received much work, and that decoherence and errors in quantum simulation require further study, especially for each physical implementation.
- Evident from the text: as a broad review, it does not present a systematic meta-analysis or new primary data, and its performance comparisons rely on cited proposals and experiments rather than a unified benchmark.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 172 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, some proofof-principle experiments on quantum simulation have already been realized (see e.g. (Friedenauer et al. , 2008; Gerritsma et al. , 2010; Greiner et al. , 2002; Kim et al. , 2010; Lanyon et al. , 2010; Leibfried et al. , 2002; Neeley et al. , 2009)).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedenauer et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Gerritsma et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Greiner et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This implies storing 2 40 ≈ 10 12 numbers for | φ 〉”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the storage capacity of N qubits is exponentially larger than that of N classical bits .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Double the number of spins, and ∼ 3 . 8 × 10 25 bits (or 5 × 10 12 TB) would be required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Calculating the time evolution of this system requires exponentiating a 2 N × 2 N matrix.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, representing the state of N spin-1/2 particles requires 2 N numbers (namely the complex probability amplitudes for the different spin configurations), and this is without including the particles' motional degrees of freedom.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assuming single precision, about ∼ 3 . 2 × 10 13 bits, that is 4 TB (terabytes), are required to represent the spin state of 40 particles in a computer memory.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Going back to the example given in the previous section, the quantum state of N = 40 spin-1/2 particles, which would require a 4TB classical memory register, can be represented by a 40qubit (i.e. 5-quantum-byte) register.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore high-fidelity one-, two and three-qubit quantum gates have been demonstrated.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In quantum magnets, the transition from a para- to an anti-ferromagnet was emulated using two trapped calcium ions in (Friedenauer et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedenauer et al. , 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 96
- It may state two separate claims as one. 54
In the paper
“In a recent experiment, the predictions of the two-dimensional Mott-Hubbard model were tested for electrons in an artificial honeycomb lattice (Singha et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Singha et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As for scalability, circuits containing 512 qubits have been fabricated (Harris, 2012; Harris et al. , 2010), although quantum coherence was not tested on these circuits in the same way that coherence is commonly tested in other experiments using small numbers of qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harris, 2012
- Not checked yetcites Harris et al. , 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, it was shown that the propagation of photons in a network of beam splitters is in general a computationally difficult task for classical computers even for a few tens of photons (Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011), and corresponding experiments with up to four photons were performed (Broome et al. , 2013; Crespi et al. , 2013; Spring et al. , 2013; Tillmann et al. , 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Broome et al. , 2013
- Not checked yetcites Crespi et al. , 2013
- Not checked yetcites Spring et al. , 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, the quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator phase, predicted in (Fisher et al. , 1989), was first observed in 2002 (Greiner et al. , 2002) in an ensemble of atoms trapped in an optical lattice.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fisher et al. , 1989
- Not checked yetcites Greiner et al. , 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As discussed in Section VI.A, an AQS of the BoseHubbard model using atoms in optical lattices was proposed in (Jaksch et al. , 1998) and implemented in (Greiner et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jaksch et al. , 1998
- Not checked yetcites Greiner et al. , 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, more than 200 superconducting resonators were recently fabricated on a single chip (Houck et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Houck et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Photons have been used to calculate the possible fractional statistics of anyons using a six-photon graph state (Lu et al. , 2009), to calculate the energy spectrum of the hydrogen molecule to 20 bits of precision (Lanyon et al. , 2010) and to simulate frustrated spin systems (Ma et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Lanyon et al. , 2010
- Not checked yetcites Ma et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“State-of-the-art superconducting qubits have coherence times exceeding 100 µ s (i.e. decoherence rates below 10 kHz), which is quite high considering that other energy scales in the circuit are typically in the range 10 MHz - 10 GHz.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As for AQS, optical lattices have been used to experimentally realize a disordered system that may lead to the observation of a Bose glass phase (Fallani et al. , 2007).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fallani et al. , 2007
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In these experiments, simulations of various spin models with up to six spins have been demonstrated, with one experiment requiring sequences of more than 100 quantum gates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lanyon et al. , 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“individual control and readout are difficult to realize for atoms in optical lattices”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while for other systems that is not a problem”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of atoms in optical lattices, quantum simulators cannot yet handle large arrays of qubits.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The machine would have the capacity to contain an exponentially large amount of information without using an exponentially large amount of physical resources, thus making it a natural tool to perform quantum simulation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control, and therefore, would be easier to construct.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other potential application areas include highenergy physics, quantum chemistry, cosmology and nuclear physics.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“With the latest advances in the coherent manipulation of quantum systems (Buluta et al. , 2011; Ladd et al. , 2010), such as atoms in optical lattices, trapped ions, nuclear spins, superconducting circuits, or spins in semiconductors, practical applications of quantum simulation can be expected in the coming years.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buluta et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Ladd et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, depending on the specifics of the problem under study, good approximations are not always available or they also face some limitations.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in, e.g., condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry and cosmology.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this difficulty may be overcome by using some controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, in condensedmatter physics, quantum simulation would allow the study of many difficult problems, such as quantum phase transitions, quantum magnetism or highT c superconductivity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simpler quantum devices that mimic the evolution of other quantum systems in an analog manner could be used for this task (note that these are not universal simulators, but rather problem-specific machines).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, note that ancilla qubits are required, which adds to the resource requirements (see Section V. B).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This sounds very promising, but the quantum simulation problem is not really solved unless the initial state preparation, the implementation of the time evolution and the measurement are realized using only polynomial resources.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This question has been thoroughly studied, and several methods have been developed (see, e.g., (Berry et al. , 2007; Bravyi et al. , 2008; Bremner et al. , 2005; Brown et al. , 2011; Dodd et al. , 2002; D¨ ur et al. , 2008; Hastings, 2006; Wang and Zanardi, 2002; Wocjan et al. , 2002a,b,c)), but it still remains a difficult problem.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Bravyi et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Bremner et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many cases the preparation of the initial state is difficult and an efficient algorithm may not be available.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As will be discussed later, these are not easy tasks, even for quantum simulators.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This results in an exponential growth of the statistical error, and hence the required simulation time, with the number of particles, which cancels the advantage of the Monte Carlo methods.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, in most cases of practical interest [ H l , H l ′ ] = 0 in general.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
In the paper
“Classical stochastic methods, namely Monte Carlo algorithms (Suzuki, 1993), have been developed as a way of tackling the difficult problem of simulating large quantum systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suzuki, 1993
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hamiltonian of the system to be simulated, H sys , is directly mapped onto the Hamiltonian of the simulator, H sim , which can be controlled at least to some extent:”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Since any unitary operation can be written in terms of universal quantum gates, it follows that in principle 'anything' can be simulated, i.e. DQS is universal (Lloyd, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lloyd, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, although not all mathematically allowed Hamiltonians can be simulated efficiently, those that appear in most physical theories can be simulated efficiently.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it must be noted that not any unitary operation can be efficiently simulated (that is with polynomial resources) and, therefore, there are Hamiltonians that cannot be efficiently simulated in this way.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
In the paper
“The topic was further discussed in (Poulin et al. , 2011) where it was shown that using randomness, it is possible to efficiently simulate local bounded Hamiltonians with arbitrary time dependence.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Poulin et al., 2011
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In principle, this approximation can be made arbitrarily accurate (by refining the decomposition), but this comes at the cost of an ever-increasing number of gates.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
In the paper
“This procedure provides an arbitrarily accurate estimate of the energy, with the accuracy increasing with increasing number of iterations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aspuru-Guzik et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
In the paper
“Moreover, according to (Meyer, 2002) it should also be possible to use quantum computers to simulate classical physics more efficiently (see also (Sinha and Russer, 2010; Yung et al. , 2010)).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Meyer, 2002
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, a few imperfections in an ensemble of particles performing AQS might not affect the overall behavior of the ensemble, such that the AQS might still produce useful results even in the presence of these imperfections.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that the simulator may only partly reproduce the dynamics of the system.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the quantum simulator suffers from uncertainties in the control parameters, the phase transition under study could still be observed, hence providing the answer to the question of interest.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The choice of the mapping depends on what needs to be simulated and on the capabilities of the simulator.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in the previous sections, fully characterizing a quantum system requires an exponentially large number of parameters.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so chemical dynamics could be simulated on a quantum computer in O ( N 2 m 2 ) steps, which is exponentially faster than known classical algorithms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analog simulation of the BoseHubbard model using atoms in optical lattices is therefore straightforward.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The estimation of the requirements for simulating N particles interacting through a pairwise potential has been performed in (Kassal et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kassal et al. , 2008
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although quantum simulators are affected by the interactions with the environment in the same way as quantum computers, it is generally believed that the effects of decoherence are less dramatic.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sometimes the mapping is indeed straightforward, but this is not always the case, and quite often clever mappings have to be devised, sometimes involving additional externally applied fields or ancillary systems to mediate various interactions.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, directly measuring some physical quantity of the simulator would yield information about its analogue in the simulated system.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The simulated system and its simulator are very similar.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finding the mapping in an AQS might, at first glance, look simpler than obtaining the most efficient gate decomposition for a given Hamiltonian in DQS.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With a few tens of qubits, one could perform frustrated-spin simulations or molecular-energy calculations at the limits of present-day supercomputers.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By analyzing the Ising model as a representative example, and using parameters that are relevant to present-day experiments, the authors concluded that surface codes are superior for quantum simulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites You et al. , 2013
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amount of physical resources (i.e., number of qubits, number of operations, number of steps, etc.) needed for the quantum simulation in the case of an N -body problem strongly depends on the type of problem and the particularities of the simulator.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As a general rule of thumb, it is sometimes said that in order to outperform classical computers quantum simulators require somewhere between 40 and 100 qubits (Buluta and Nori, 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buluta and Nori, 2009
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This new class of algorithms makes it possible to simulate spin systems for longer times, and to study physical phenomena which would have been inaccessible with previous methods.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In AQS one is usually emulating an effective many-body model of the simulated system. A controllable 'toy-model' of the system is used to reproduce the property of interest, e.g. the dynamics or ground state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Its quantum version allows for the direct sampling from the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, overcoming in this way the sign problem (Temme et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Temme et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, it has been suggested that the decoherence of the simulator might be useful (Lloyd, 1996) as it could serve as a rough way of modeling the decoherence of the simulated system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lloyd, 1996
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, quantum dots allow flexible control over the confinement potential and they can also be excited optically.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Electron spins in quantum dots may provide an advantage over atoms in optical lattices due to the very low temperatures (relative to the Fermi temperature) that can be reached and the natural long-range Coulomb interaction.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The physical implementation of a quantum simulator requires a controllable quantum mechanical system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is not very flexible and its main disadvantage is the lack of scalability, one of the main reasons being the spectral crowding that occurs as the number of energy levels increases exponentially with increasing number of spins.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For many problems in this class, an array of qubits plus their controls (see Figure 8) would make an ideal quantum simulator because it can be thought of as the simplified, magnified lattice structure of a 'solid', that can be manipulated in a number of different ways in order to test various models.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ion qubits also have long coherence times of the order of seconds, and sequences of high-fidelity quantum gates have been demonstrated in experiment (Hanneke et al. , 2009; Lanyon et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hanneke et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Lanyon et al. , 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using RF pulses various one-, two- and possibly multi-qubit gates can be implemented.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crossvalidation over a number of different physical systems could be used, and in this way the particular imperfections of each implementation could be ruled out as possible sources of error.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, optical lattices provide the highly desirable properties of being easily tunable and essentially defect-free.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Alternative systems that can be used for quantum simulation include Rydberg atoms (Weimer et al. , 2010) and polar molecules (Lewenstein, 2006; Micheli et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Weimer et al. , 2010
- Not checked yetcites Lewenstein, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Micheli et al. , 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Nuclear spins manipulated by means of NMR have been among the first experimental systems to implement small quantum algorithms and quantum simulation (Li et al. , 2011; Peng and Suter, 2010; Peng et al. , 2009; Zhang et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Li et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Peng and Suter, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Peng et al. , 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, nuclear spins provide a very good testbed for various small simulation problems and allow the implementation of both DQS and AQS.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any physical system that can be used as a quantum computer would also be a universal machine for DQS.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the region is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the charge carrier, the energy levels are quantized and the quantum dot becomes very similar to a real atom (and can therefore be referred to as an 'artificial atom').”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ions can be trapped by electric (or magnetic) fields, laser-cooled and manipulated with high precision for realizing quantum simulation (Blatt and Wineland, 2008; Johanning et al. , 2009; Sch¨ atz et al. , 2007, 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blatt and Wineland, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Johanning et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Sch¨ atz et al. , 2007, 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“several groups have observed signatures of the crossover between a BCS and a BEC superfluid as the strength of attractive interactions between fermionic particles is varied”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Regal et al. , 2004
- Not checked yetcites Zwierlein et al. , 2005
- Not checked yetcites Lewenstein et al. , 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The frequencies can also be tuned in situ by adjusting an external parameter (typically an external magnetic field), and the coupling energy between two qubits can be turned on and off at will.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Photons can carry quantum information over long distances, hardly being affected by noise or decoherence.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hubbard model is the simplest model of interacting particles on a lattice. However, for large numbers of particles in more than one dimensions, the model is difficult to treat using classical computers.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, with a quantum simulator one could address problems that are either intractable on classical computers or experimentally challenging .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently only with neutral atoms in an optical lattice is it possible to perform quantum simulations with more than a few particles, and these systems can at present be considered the most advanced platform for AQS.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They naturally possess the ability to encode qubit states, e.g. in the polarization of the photon, and one-qubit gates can be easily realized with linear optical components.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it has been simulated with a trapped ion (Gerritsma et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerritsma et al. , 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles.
In the paper
“Another system that could be used for the quantum simulation of condensed matter physics is electrons trapped on the surface of liquid helium (Mostame and Sch¨ utzhold, 2008). This setup could be used to simulate the Ising model.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mostame and Sch¨ utzhold, 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent experiment (L¨ ahteenm¨ aki et al. , 2013) used a superconducting circuit to simulate a massless Klein-Gordon field with tunable speed of propagation, which was used to simulate the generation of photons in the dynamical casimir effect.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites L¨ ahteenm¨ aki et al. , 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A quantum simulation of this phenomenon was recently implemented with trapped ions (Gerritsma et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerritsma et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, superconducting circuits can be coupled to 'cavities', which are actually electrical resonators (and the 'photons' are, for the most part, electron-density oscillations). This setup is very useful for the study of electric-circuit analogues of cavity quantum electrodynamics (circuit QED) (Schoelkopf and Girvin, 2008; You and Nori, 2005, 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schoelkopf and Girvin, 2008
- Not checked yetcites You and Nori, 2005, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although macroscopic in size, these circuits can display quantum behavior and can be seen as 'artificial atoms'.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike other systems studied in the context of quantum computation, however, NV centers in diamond have not received much attention as potential quantum simulators, which might be due to difficulties in coupling the NV centers to each other and future scalability.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it is also possible to simulate classically the Zitterbewegung of a free Dirac electron in an optical superlattice (Dreisow et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dreisow et al. , 2010
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In principle it could be scaled up, but the control would be very difficult.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the difficulty in implementing two-qubit gates is a serious drawback for photonic systems in the context of quantum computation, there have been some notable achievements for quantum simulation using photons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum information can be encoded in different ways: in the number of superconducting electrons on a small island, in the direction of a current around a loop, or in oscillatory states of the circuit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Both have discrete energy levels and exhibit coherent quantum oscillations between those levels.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites You and Nori, 2005, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the quantum baker's map, a prototypical example in quantum chaos, has an efficient realization in terms of quantum gates (Schack, 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schack, 1998
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In (Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005) it was shown how to compute molecular energies using DQS and the required number of qubits was estimated (see also Figure 4).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simulating the dynamics of open quantum systems is even more costly than that of closed quantum systems because solving the Lindblad equation requires quadratically more resources than solving the Schr¨ odinger equation for the same physical system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In (Piilo and Maniscalco, 2006) it was theoretically shown that a driven harmonic oscillator can act as a quantum simulator for the non-Markovian damped harmonic oscillator.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Piilo and Maniscalco, 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Another recent experiment simulated non-markovian Dynamics using a linear-optics setup (Chiuri et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chiuri et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simulating open quantum systems with quantum simulators can be done in two ways.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“More recently, chemical reaction dynamics have been investigated using NMR DQS (Lu et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A simulation of decoherence caused by classical noise that was artificially added to the control signal of a superconducting qubit was reported in (Li et al. , 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Li et al. , 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A recent experiment with trapped ions demonstrated the possibility of engineering open-system dynamics using the dissipative preparation of entangled states (Barreiro et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barreiro et al. , 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The algorithm would run in polynomial time while any exact classical simulation is bound to exhibit exponential scaling.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lidar and Wang, 1999
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors showed how a quantum dot with one electron can be considered an artificial hydrogen atom and a quantum dot containing four electrons can be viewed as an artificial oxygen atom.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smirnov et al. , 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But whereas natural atoms are driven using visible or microwave photons that excite electrons from one state to another, the artificial atoms in the circuits are driven by currents, voltages, and microwave photons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences between quantum circuits and natural atoms include how strongly each system couples to its environment (the coupling is weak for atoms and strong for circuits) and the energy scales of the two systems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“an efficient algorithm for calculating the thermal rate constant was given in (Lidar and Wang, 1999).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lidar and Wang, 1999
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The molecular energies of the hydrogen molecule have been calculated using a small photonic DQS (Lanyon et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lanyon et al. , 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The number of qubits scales linearly with the number of basis functions, and the number of gates grows polynomially with the number of qubits, so simulations with a few tens or a hundred qubits would already outperform classical computers.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter phenomena can be realized using quasi-one-dimensional open systems where photons are injected from one side and move towards the opposite side of the device.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for some problems where bulk properties are of interest, individual control and measurement may not be required”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“it was shown that six to ten qubits would be sufficient for a simulation of the single-particle Schr¨ odinger equation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Benenti and Strini, 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The demonstration of quantum simulations using more than a few tens of qubits would mark the point where quantum computers (whether digital or analog) surpass their classical counterparts, at least for certain applications.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several phenomenological models have been developed, one of which is the superfluid model of the atomic nucleus.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Progress on the experimental implementation of quantum simulation would also be relevant for measurement-based quantum computation.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“adiabatic quantum computation can be viewed as a special case of quantum simulation where the ground state of the simulated Hamiltonian encodes the solution to a computational problem”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Farhi et al. , 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the experimental point of view, in all proposed quantum simulators improved controllability and scalability are required.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though N is not as large as in condensed matter physics (in this case N , the atomic mass number, is smaller than 300), the calculation of the nuclear force is difficult and therefore nuclear physics simulations require significant computing power.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several recent experiments have demonstrated boson sampling using photons (Broome et al. , 2013; Crespi et al. , 2013; Spring et al. , 2013; Tillmann et al. , 2013)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Broome et al. , 2013
- Not checked yetcites Crespi et al. , 2013
- Not checked yetcites Spring et al. , 2013
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These qubits, operating as tunable mirrors, can change the reflection and transmission coefficients of photons confined in waveguides.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent theoretical and experimental results on quantum simulation lead us to believe that practical quantum simulators will be built in the near future.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Current theoretical and experimental progress in quantum simulation will continue at a pace sufficient to build practical quantum simulators in the near future.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Superconducting qubits can be used, for example, to perform Landau-Zener-St¨ uckelberg interferometry (Shevchenko et al. , 2010) and Fano and Fabry-Perot interferometry (Ian et al. , 2009; Liao et al. , 2010; Zhou et al. , 2008a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shevchenko et al. , 2010
- Not checked yetcites Ian et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Liao et al. , 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Along the way, the photons interact with either one or two qubits acting as tunable mirrors, controlled by changing the applied electric and/or magnetic fields on the qubits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Boson sampling (Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011) is another interferometry problem that is closely related to quantum simulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some recent topics in physics research, such as Majorana fermions (Casanova et al. , 2011; You et al. , 2011), graphene (Gibertini et al. , 2009) or neutrino oscillations (Noh et al. , 2012) are now discussed in the context of quantum simulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Casanova et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites You et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Gibertini et al. , 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This was among the first experimental realizations of quantum simulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leibfried et al. , 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Nonlinear interferometers were first investigated in trapped-ion experiments (Leibfried et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leibfried et al. , 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should exhibit observable interesting behavior even with only eight qubits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The quantum baker's map has been experimentally realized in NMR (Weinstein et al. , 2002) and with linear optics (Howell and Yeaze, 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Weinstein et al. , 2002
- Not checked yetcites Howell and Yeaze, 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The possibility of simulating the Schr¨ odinger equation on a DQS was first discussed in 1996 (Lloyd, 1996), with concrete algorithms given in 1998 (Boghosian and Taylor, 1998a), where a quantum lattice-gas model for the many-particle Schr¨ odinger equation in d dimensions was proposed.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lloyd, 1996
- Not checked yetcites Boghosian and Taylor, 1998a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
“We assume that the Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
“Furthermore, it is usually assumed that there is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and that all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The simulated system and its simulator are very similar.
“Because the system and simulator are presumed to be very similar”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Lamb-Dicke parameter η is small.
“η is the Lamb-Dicke parameter (which is assumed to be small here)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.
“The initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Less attention has been paid in the literature to the scaling of required resources with desired accuracy than to scaling with system size.
“Compared with the studies on scaling with the system size, less attention has been paid in the literature to the scaling of required resources with desired accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There has not been much work in the literature on resource estimation for AQS.
“There has not been much work in the literature on resource estimation for AQS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
So far there are few studies investigating how the simulator's imperfections affect the quantum simulation.
“So far there are few studies investigating how the simulator's imperfections affect the quantum simulation”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Hamiltonian given for N charge or flux qubits biased at their symmetry points and coupled capacitively or inductively is valid for describing superconducting-circuit quantum simulators.
“The Hamiltonian for N charge (flux) qubits biased at their symmetry points (which is optimal for quantum coherence) coupled capacitively (inductively) is:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Hubbard Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the Fermi-Hubbard model.
“In (Somma et al. , 2002) it was shown how to obtain the energy spectrum of the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The spin Hamiltonian form given is valid for describing spin systems.
“Spin systems are typically described by Hamiltonians of the form”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The quantum Ising model Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the trapped-ion quantum magnet simulation.
“The system is described by the quantum Ising model. The Hamiltonian for a chain (with two or more spins) is given by”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Fano-Anderson Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the fermionic Fano-Anderson model.
“The Fano-Anderson Hamiltonian can be written as follows:”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current theoretical and experimental progress in quantum simulation will continue at a pace sufficient to build practical quantum simulators in the near future.
“Recent theoretical and experimental results on quantum simulation lead us to believe that practical quantum simulators will be built in the near future.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles.
“Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simulation of gauge theories is a very computationally intensive quantum many-body problem.
“The simulation of gauge theories can be a very computationally intensive quantum many-body problem”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the most important early application of quantum computers is likely to be the simulation of quantum systems. 40 -42”
From Quantum algorithms: an overview (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“and quantum simulations have now been implemented, in some form, on essentially every technological platform for quantum computing.”
From Quantum algorithms: an overview (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several devices that are publicized in the name 'quantum simulation' are, in fact, analog simulators [63-67].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“Fortunately, this synergy has been amplified by the development of software platforms such as Rigetti's pyQuil 389 , IBM's QISKit 390 , ETH Z¨ urich's ProjectQ 391 , Google's Cirq 392 , and Xanadu's Strawberry Fields 393 .”
From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [390]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claim that only neutral atoms simulate more than a few particles conflicts with ion result
MajorThe review says only neutral atoms in an optical lattice can currently simulate more than a few particles, but elsewhere reports a trapped-ion simulation with hundreds of ions.
“Currently only with neutral atoms in an optical lattice is it possible to perform quantum simulations with more than a few particles”
“In fact a two-dimensional ion array was recently used to implement a quantum simulation of a spin system with hundreds of ions (Britton et al. , 2012).”
Stated inter-qubit distance range excludes the stated ion distances
MinorFigure 16 gives ion separations of 10-50 μm, then summarizes the inter-qubit distances as ranging only from 0.1 to 10 μm.
“As for the inter-ion distances in ion trap arrays, they are about 10-50 µ m and about the same for two-dimensional Coulomb crystals.”
“These inter-qubit distances (from 0.1 to 10 µ m) are to be compared with the far smaller average inter-atomic distances in solids, which are ≤ 1 nm.”
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Many-body physics with ultracold gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Zwerger, W. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 · Cited by 8,114 · cited 1×
“Other reviews (Bloch et al., 2012, 2008) describe recent experimental progress.”
BackgroundSimulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238 · cited 3×
“…have a positive impact on the development of other fields such as adiabatic quantum computation (Farhi et al., 2001), measurement-based quantum computation (Raussendorf et al., 2003), topological quantum computation (Kitaev, 2003) and the theory of quantum computation (Vollbrecht and Cirac, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodKimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023 · cited 2×
“, 2006) could also be used as quantum simulators (see also (Kimble, 2008)).”
BackgroundQuantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935 · cited 15×
“interaction energy was controlled in (Greiner et al., 2002) by adjusting the lattice potential depth, such that the quantum”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene
Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys384 · Cited by 3,896 · cited 1×
“A proposal for a simulation using graphene was put forward in (Katsnelson et al., 2006).”
MethodStrong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Cold Bosonic Atoms in Optical Lattices
Jaksch, D., Bruder, C., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3108 · Cited by 3,685 · cited 8×
“Hubbard models Atoms (Jaksch et al., 1998),(Greiner et al.”
MethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 398 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Aaronson, S., 2011, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
- Manin, Y., 1980, Computable and Uncomputable
- Porras, D., 2005, Laser Phys., 15, 88
- 10.1007/s11128-011-0303-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,006
Mendoza-Arenas, J. J., Clark, S. R. L., & Jaksch, D. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.042129 · Cited by 34
Dissipation-induced bistability in the two-photon Dicke model
Garbe, L., Wade, P., Minganti, F., Shammah, N., Felicetti, S., & Nori, F. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69704-6 · Cited by 38
Self-citationRahmani, A., Sung, K. J., Putterman, H., Roushan, P., Ghaemi, P., & Jiang, Z. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020309 · Cited by 36
Efficient quantum simulation of open quantum dynamics at various Hamiltonians and spectral densities
Zhang, N., Tao, M., He, W., Chen, X., Kong, X., Deng, F., Lambert, N., & Ai, Q. (2021) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-021-1064-y · Cited by 35
Nation, C., & Porras, D. (2018) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · Cited by 35
Towards On-Demand Heralded Single-Photon Sources via Photon Blockade
Tang, J., Tang, L., Wu, H., Wu, Y., Sun, H., Zhang, H., Li, T., Lu, Y., Xiao, M., & Xia, K. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.064020 · Cited by 35
Quantum Approach to Accelerate Finite Volume Method on Steady Computational Fluid Dynamics Problems
Chen, Z., Xue, C., Chen, S., Lu, B.-H., Wu, Y.-C., Ding, J.-C., Huang, S., & Guo, G. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03478-w · Cited by 63
Quantum Algorithms for Scientific Computing and Approximate OptimizationPreprint
Hadfield, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.7916/d8x650c9 · Cited by 76
A Comprehensive Survey on Quantum Machine Learning and Possible Applications
Umer, M. J., & Sharif, M. I. (2022) · International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications · doi:10.4018/ijehmc.315730 · Cited by 41
“A survey on difficult quantum simulation problems is presented in (Georgescu et al., 2014).”
BackgroundCoupling erbium spins to a three-dimensional superconducting cavity at zero magnetic field
Chen, Y., Fernandez-Gonzalvo, X., & Longdell, J. J. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.075117 · Cited by 34
Simulation of single-qubit open quantum systems
Sweke, R., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022331 · Cited by 33
Experimental quantum simulation of Avian Compass in a nuclear magnetic resonance system
Pearson, J., Feng, G., Zheng, C., & Long, G. (2016) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-016-0376-6 · Cited by 34
Invariants of quantum programs: characterisations and generation
Ying, M., Ying, S., & Wu, X. (2016) · ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL) · doi:10.1145/3009837.3009840 · Cited by 37
Steady-state entanglement and thermalization of coupled qubits in two common heat baths
Hu, L.-Z., Man, Z., & Xia, Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1825-x · Cited by 34
Experimental demonstration of quantum walks with initial superposition states
Su, Q.-P., Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Zhou, J.-Q., Jin, J., Xu, X.-Q., Xiong, S.-J., Xu, Q., Sun, Z., Chen, K., et al. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0155-x · Cited by 35
Self-citationQuantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction
Kerker, N., Röpke, R., Steinert, L. M., Pooch, A., & Stibor, A. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab8efc · Cited by 31
Reinforcement learning for optimal error correction of toric codes
Colomer, L. D., Skotiniotis, M., & Muñoz-Tapia, R. (2020) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126353 · Cited by 40
Two-Unitary Decomposition Algorithm and Open Quantum System Simulation
Suri, N., Barreto, J., Hadfield, S., Wiebe, N., Wudarski, F., & Marshall, J. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-05-15-1002 · Cited by 37
Making Trotterization Adaptive and Energy-Self-Correcting for NISQ Devices and Beyond
Zhao, H., Bukov, M., Heyl, M., & Moessner, R. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030319 · Cited by 46
Perturbative Quantum Simulation
Sun, J., Endo, S., Lin, H., Hayden, P. M., Vedral, V., & Yuan, X. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.120505 · Cited by 36
Quantum Optimal Control via Semi-Automatic Differentiation
Goerz, M. H., Carrasco, S. C., & Malinovsky, V. S. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-12-07-871 · Cited by 36
Quantum Algorithms and Applications for Open Quantum Systems
Delgado-Granados, L. H., Krogmeier, T. J., Sager-Smith, L. M., Avdic, I., Hu, Z., Sajjan, M., Abbasi, M., Smart, S. E., Narang, P., Kais, S., et al. (2025) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00428 · Cited by 50
Phase-modulated photon antibunching in a two-level system coupled to two cavities
Wang, C., Liu, Y., Wu, R.-B., & Liu, Y.-X. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.013818 · Cited by 33
Controlling quantum random walk with a step-dependent coin
Panahiyan, S., & Fritzsche, S. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad899 · Cited by 34
Chaos-assisted tunneling resonances in a synthetic Floquet superlattice
Arnal, M., Chatelain, G., Martinez, M., Dupont, N., Giraud, O., Ullmo, D., Georgeot, B., Lemarié, G., Billy, J., & Guéry-Odelin, D. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc4886 · Cited by 33
Quantum Advantage in Simulating Stochastic Processes
Korzekwa, K., & Lostaglio, M. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021019 · Cited by 30
Dynamical Phase Transitions in Dissipative Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Optical Realization
Link, V., & Strunz, W. T. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.143602 · Cited by 34
Experimental Investigation of State Distinguishability in Parity-Time Symmetric Quantum Dynamics
Wang, Y., Li, Z., Yu, S., Ke, Z., Liu, W., Meng, Y., Yang, Y.-Z., Tang, J., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.230402 · Cited by 32
Quantum Otto heat engine based on a multiferroic chain working substance
Azimi, M., Chotorlishvili, L., Mishra, S. K., Vekua, T., Hübner, W., & Berakdar, J. (2014) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/377 · Cited by 33
Valley interference and spin exchange at the atomic scale in silicon
Voisin, B., Bocquel, J., Tankasala, A., Usman, M., Salfi, J., Rahman, R., Simmons, M. Y., Hollenberg, L. C. L., & Rogge, S. M. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19835-1 · Cited by 33
Gap-protected transfer of topological defect states in photonic lattices
Yuan, J., Xu, C., Cai, H., & Wang, D. (2021) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0037394 · Cited by 36
Experimental demonstration of efficient high-dimensional quantum gates with orbital angular momentum
Wang, Y., Ru, S., Wang, F., Zhang, P., & Li, F. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac3c19 · Cited by 33
Medium induced jet broadening in a quantum computer
Barata, J., Du, X., Li, M., Qian, W., & Salgado, C. A. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.074013 · Cited by 34
Tammaro, A., Galli, D. E., Rice, J. E., & Motta, M. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.2c07653 · Cited by 35
Detecting topological phases of microwave photons in a circuit quantum electrodynamics lattice
Wang, Y.-P., Yang, W.-L., Hu, Y., Xue, Z., & Wu, Y. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.15 · Cited by 33
Kim, C. W., Nichol, J. M., Jordan, A. N., & Franco, I. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040308 · Cited by 32
Kang, M., Nuomin, H., Chowdhury, S. N., Yuly, J. L., Sun, K., Whitlow, J., Valdiviezo, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, P., Beratan, D. N., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-024-00595-1 · Cited by 40
Error-Tolerant Amplification and Simulation of the Ultrastrong-Coupling Quantum Rabi Model
Chen, Y., Shi, Z., Nori, F., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.033603 · Cited by 33
“In this respect, proposals in both theory [11–14] and experiments [15–19] for analog quantum simulation [20, 21] of the QRM were put forward.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA synthetic magnetic vector potential in a 2D superconducting qubit array
Rosen, I. T., Muschinske, S. E., Barrett, C. N., Chatterjee, A., Hays, M., DeMarco, M. A., Karamlou, A. H., Rower, D. A., Das, R. N., Kim, D. K., et al. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02661-3 · Cited by 32
“The Ramsey dephasing times times of all qubits at the operational frequency setpoints is shown in Fig.”
BackgroundFinite-size scaling at the first-order quantum transitions of quantum Potts chains
Massimo Campostrini, B., Nespolo, J., Andrea Pelissetto, C., & Vicari, E. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.052103 · Cited by 32
Generation of a frequency-degenerate four-photon entangled state using a silicon nanowire
Feng, L.-T., Zhang, M., Zhou, Z.-Y., Chen, Y., Li, M., Daoxin Dai, A., Ren, H.-L., Guo, G.-P., Guo, G.-C., Tame, M., et al. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0205-4 · Cited by 31
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in collapse and revival oscillations of a quenched superfluid
Łącki, M., & Heyl, M. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.121107 · Cited by 33
Płodzień, M., Kościelski, M., Witkowska, E., & Sinatra, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.013328 · Cited by 18
Castaldo, D., Rosa, M., & Corni, S. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.022613 · Cited by 32
Analysis of the likelihood of quantum computing proliferation
Rosch-Grace, D., & Straub, J. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101880 · Cited by 39
Performance of Heisenberg-coupled spins as quantum Stirling heat machine near quantum critical point
Purkait, C., & Biswas, A. (2022) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128180 · Cited by 32
Rise and Fall, and Slow Rise Again, of Operator Entanglement under Dephasing.
Wellnitz, D., Preisser, G., Alba, V., Dubail, J., & Schachenmayer, J. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.170401 · Cited by 39
Zippilli, S., Li, J., & Vitali, D. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032319 · Cited by 32
Digital quantum simulators in a scalable architecture of hybrid spin-photon qubits
Chiesa, A., Santini, P. M., Gerace, D., Raftery, J. J., Houck, A., & Carretta, S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16036 · Cited by 32
Repeater-enhanced distributed quantum sensing based on continuous-variable multipartite entanglement
Xia, Y., Zhuang, Q., Clark, W., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012328 · Cited by 32
Castaldo, D., Rosa, M., & Corni, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00368 · Cited by 32
Optimal quantum reservoir computing for the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era
Domingo, L., Carlo, G. G., & Borondo, F. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.l043301 · Cited by 36
Simulating unsteady flows on a superconducting quantum processor
Meng, Z., Zhong, J., Xu, S., Wang, K., Chen, J., Jin, F., Zhu, X., Gao, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, C., et al. (2024) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01845-w · Cited by 29
Geller, M. R., Martinis, J. M., Sornborger, A. T., Stancil, P. C., Pritchett, E., You, H., & Galiautdinov, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.062309 · Cited by 31
Observation of Topological Links Associated with Hopf Insulators in a Solid-State Quantum Simulator
Yuan, X., He, L., Wang, S.-T., Deng, D.-L., Wang, F., Lian, W., Wang, X., Zhang, C.-H., Zhang, H.-L., Chang, X.-Y., et al. (2017) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/34/6/060302 · Cited by 31
Observation of the Borromean Three-Body Förster Resonances for Three Interacting Rb Rydberg Atoms
Tretyakov, D. B., Beterov, I. I., Yakshina, E. A., Entin, V. M., Ryabtsev, I. I., Cheinet, P., & Pillet, P. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.173402 · Cited by 31
Spatial-Translation-Induced Discrete Time Crystals
Mizuta, K., Takasan, K., Nakagawa, M., & Kawakami, N. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.093001 · Cited by 30
Local quantum uncertainty in XY Z Heisenberg spin models with Dzyaloshinski–Moriya interaction
Habiballah, N., Khedif, Y., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2018) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2018-90255-y · Cited by 31
Neutrino oscillations in a quantum processor
Argüelles, C. A., & Jones, B. J. P. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033176 · Cited by 31
Machine learning design of a trapped-ion quantum spin simulator
Teoh, Y. H., Drygala, M., Melko, R. G., & Islam, R. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab657a · Cited by 32
Entanglement Hamiltonians for non-criticalquantum chains
Eisler, V., Giulio, G. D., Erik Tonni, C., & Peschel, I. (2020) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-28329 · Cited by 31
Many-body hierarchy of dissipative timescales in a quantum computer
Sommer, O. E., Piazza, F., & Luitz, D. J. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023190 · Cited by 33
Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round-a-face
Prosen, T. (2021) · Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) · Cited by 31
Quantum Computing at an Inflection Point: Are we Ready for a New Paradigm
Bhasin, A., & Tripathi, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3103904 · Cited by 34
Synthesizing Five-Body Interaction in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit
Zhang, K., Li, H., Zhang, P., Yuan, J., Chen, J., Ren, W., Wang, Z., Song, C., Wang, D., Wang, H., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.190502 · Cited by 30
Quantum computation of reactions on surfaces using local embedding
Gujarati, T. P., Motta, M., Friedhoff, T., Rice, J. E., Nguyen, N., Barkoutsos, P. K., Thompson, R. J., Smith, T., Kagele, M., Brei, M., et al. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00753-1 · Cited by 35
Manipulating synthetic gauge fluxes via multicolor dressing of Rydberg-atom arrays
Wu, X., Yang, F., Yang, S., Mølmer, K., Pohl, T., Tey, M. K., & You, L. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.l032046 · Cited by 31
High- E J / E C transmon qudits with up to 12 levels
Wang, Z., Parker, R. W., Champion, E., & Blok, M. S. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.034046 · Cited by 29
Integrable Digital Quantum Simulation: Generalized Gibbs Ensembles and Trotter Transitions
Vernier, E., Bertini, B., Giudici, G., & Piroli, L. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.260401 · Cited by 35
Analog quantum simulation of partial differential equations
Jin, S., & Liu, N. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad49cf · Cited by 44
“Quantum simulators provide the most plausible near-term device for efficiently simulating a wide range of Hamiltonians [23, 24].”
BackgroundExperimental quantum-enhanced kernel-based machine learning on a photonic processor
Yin, Z., Agresti, I., de Felice, G., Brown, D., Toumi, A., Pentangelo, C., Piacentini, S., Crespi, A., Ceccarelli, F., Osellame, R., et al. (2025) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01682-5 · Cited by 53
“These range from the realization of a global-scale quantum communication network—the quantum internet—to the simulation of quantum systems and to quantum computing 1,2 .”
Latent Computational Complexity of Symmetry-Protected Topological Order with Fractional Symmetry
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.170503 · Cited by 30
Interference in a Prototype of a Two-Dimensional Ion Trap Array Quantum Simulator
Hakelberg, F., Kiefer, P., Wittemer, M., Warring, U., & Schaetz, T. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.100504 · Cited by 31
Quantum Transport of Rydberg Excitons with Synthetic Spin-Exchange Interactions
Yang, F., Yang, S., & You, L. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.063001 · Cited by 30
Long-Range Coherence and Multiple Steady States in a Lossy Qubit Array
Dutta, S., & Cooper, N. R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.240404 · Cited by 33
Precise programmable quantum simulations with optical lattices
Qiu, X., Zou, J., Qi, X., & Li, X. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00315-9 · Cited by 31
Decoherence scaling transition in the dynamics of quantum information scrambling
Domínguez, F. D., Rodríguez, M. C., Kaiser, R., Suter, D., & Álvarez, G. A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.012402 · Cited by 34
Quantifying the nonclassicality of pure dephasing
Chen, H., Lo, P., Gneiting, C., Bae, J., Chen, Y.-N., & Nori, F. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 30
Self-citationHolographic software for quantum networks
Jaffe, A., Liu, Z., & Wozniakowski, A. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 30
Zhang, J., Chattaraj, S., Huang, Q., Jordao, L., Lu, S., & Madhukar, A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn9252 · Cited by 30
Simulation of Quantum Many-Body Dynamics with Tensor Processing Units: Floquet Prethermalization
Morningstar, A., Hauru, M., Beall, J., Ganahl, M., Lewis, A. G. M., Khemani, V., & Vidal, G. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020331 · Cited by 31
Li, B.-W., Mei, Q.-X., Wu, Y., Cai, M.-L., Wang, Y., Yao, L., Zhou, Z.-C., & Duan, L.-M. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.140501 · Cited by 29
Wang, Z., Sun, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.043801 · Cited by 30
Quantum machine learning for drowsiness detection with EEG signals
Lins, I. D., Araújo, L. M. M., Maior, C. B. S., Ramos, P. M. D. S., Moura, M. J. D. C., Ferreira–Martins, A. J., Chaves, R., & Canabarro, A. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.032 · Cited by 32
Chowdhury, T. A., Yu, K., Shamim, M. A., Kabir, M. L., & Sufian, R. S. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033107 · Cited by 45
Benchmarking Digital Quantum Simulations Above Hundreds of Qubits Using Quantum Critical Dynamics
Miessen, A., Egger, D. J., Tavernelli, I., & Mazzola, G. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040320 · Cited by 42
“Many believe that only quantum simulators [4], i.e., controllable quantum systems that can emulate others [5], can tackle this problem at scale [6, 7].”
BackgroundCyclic solid-state quantum battery: thermodynamic characterization and quantum hardware simulation
Razzoli, L., Gemme, G., Khomchenko, I., Sassetti, M., Ouerdane, H., Ferraro, D., & Benenti, G. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad9ed4 · Cited by 29
“Indeed, devices that rely on these phenomena can achieve a substantial advantage over classical machines in a widespread range of technological application including secure data exchange [1, 2], computation [3–7], and simulation of the behavior of complex systems under controlled conditions [8, 9].”
BackgroundProduction and characterization of a dual species magneto-optical trap of cesium and ytterbium
Kemp, S. L., Butler, K. L., Freytag, R., Hopkins, S. A., Hinds, E. A., Tarbutt, M. R., & Cornish, S. L. (2016) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.4941719 · Cited by 29
Tan, X., Zhao, Y. X., Liu, Q., Xue, G., Yu, H., Wang, Z. D., & Yu, Y. (2017) · npj Quantum Materials · doi:10.1038/s41535-017-0062-3 · Cited by 29
Andrea Pelissetto, C., Rossini, D., & Vicari, E. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.094414 · Cited by 29
Liu, W., Zheng, D., & Zhao, S.-P. (2018) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/2/027401 · Cited by 32
Quantitative robustness analysis of quantum programs
Hung, S.-H., Hietala, K., Zhu, S., Ying, M., Hicks, M., & Wu, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3290344 · Cited by 53
Polaritonic network as a paradigm for dynamics of coupled oscillators
Kalinin, K. P., & Berloff, N. G. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.245306 · Cited by 29
Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Processes without Reservoir Engineering
Di Candia, R., Simón Pedernales, J. J., Del Campo, A., Solano, E., & Casanova Marcos, J. (2015) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 39
Spatiotemporal dynamics of particle collisions in quantum spin chains
Karpov, P., Zhu, G., Heller, M. P., & Heyl, M. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.l032001 · Cited by 31
Spreading of correlations and entanglement in the long-range transverse Ising chain
Schneider, J. T., Despres, J., Thomson, S. J., Tagliacozzo, L., & Sanchez-Palencia, L. (2021) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 29
Entanglement dynamics in confining spin chains
Scopa, S., Calabrese, P., & Bastianello, A. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.125413 · Cited by 28
Propagation of errors and quantitative quantum simulation with quantum advantage
Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Low, G. H., Buyskikh, A. S., Bloch, I., Zoller, P., Troyer, M., & Daley, A. J. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac88f5 · Cited by 48
Park, A. J., Trautmann, J., Šantić, N., Klüsener, V., Heinz, A., Bloch, I., & Blatt, S. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030314 · Cited by 33
Magoni, M., Carollo, F., Perfetto, G., & Lesanovsky, I. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052210 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F.
- Affiliations
- RIKEN (JP)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-03-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-185
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W3037443854
- Semantic Scholar
- 29fef61b3d7c3fcbd70e5055c17743173e317d67
- Cited by
- 2,932
- References
- 398
- Citations by year
- 2026: 195 · 2025: 320 · 2024: 324 · 2023: 313 · 2022: 302 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 242 · 2019: 243 · 2018: 197 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 146 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 58
- FWCI
- 77.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum simulation, quantum simulators, quantum computing hardware, analog quantum simulation, quantum many-body systems, trapped ions, neutral atoms, polar molecules, superconducting circuits, nuclear spin, quantum chemistry, condensed matter physics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review