Quantum optimal control with quantum computers: an hybrid algorithm featuring machine learning optimization
Open accessAbstract
We develop an hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to solve an optimal population transfer problem for a molecule subject to a laser pulse. The evolution of the molecular wavefunction under the laser pulse is simulated on a quantum computer, while the optimal pulse is iteratively shaped via a machine learning (evolutionary) algorithm. A method to encode on the quantum computer the n-electrons wavefunction is discussed, the circuits accomplishing its quantum simulation are derived and the scalability in terms of number of operations is discussed. Performance on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices (IBM Q X2) is provided to assess the current technological gap. Furthermore the hybrid algorithm is tested on a quantum emulator to compare performance of the evolutionary algorithm with standard ones. Our results show that such algorithms are able to outperform the optimization with a downhill simplex method and provide performance comparable to more advanced (but quantum-computer unfriendly) algorithms such as Rabitz's.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have been implemented for computing quantum optimal control pulses, particularly for controlling molecular systems.
“Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have also been implemented for computing quantum optimal control pulses, in particular for controlling molecular systems (Castaldo et al. , 2020; Magann et al. , 2020).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Castaldo et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,169 · see citing works
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905 · see citing works
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
Goldberg, D. E. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,030 · see citing works
Nocedal, J. M., & Wright, S. J. (2006) · Springer series in operations research/Springer series in operations research and financial engineering · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 · Cited by 9,575 · see citing works
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720 · see citing works
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations
Valiev, M., Bylaska, E. J., Govind, N., Kowalski, K., Straatsma, T. P., van Dam, H. J. J., Wang, D., Nieplocha, J., Aprà, E., Windus, T. L., et al. (2010) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · Cited by 5,794 · see citing works
Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy
Mukamel, S. (1995) · Cited by 4,566 · see citing works
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552 · see citing works
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088 · see citing works
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982 · see citing works
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
Introduction to the Theory of Computation
Sipser, M. (1996) · ACM SIGACT News · doi:10.1145/230514.571645 · Cited by 2,828 · see citing works
Single-Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules
Dreuw, A., & Head‐Gordon, M. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0505627 · Cited by 2,726 · see citing works
�ber das Paulische �quivalenzverbot
Jordan, P., & Wigner, E. (1928) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01331938 · Cited by 2,597 · see citing works
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594 · see citing works
The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
Schwefel, H. (1995) · Cited by 2,197 · see citing works
Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., & Glaser, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004 · Cited by 1,854 · see citing works
Quantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Teaching lasers to control molecules
Judson, R., & RABITZ, H. A. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1500 · Cited by 1,574 · see citing works
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
Qiskit: An Open-source Framework for Quantum Computing
Aleksandrowicz, G., Alexander, T., Barkoutsos, P. K., Bello, L., Ben-Haim, Y., Bucher, D., Cabrera-Hernández, F. J., Carballo-Franquis, J., Chen, A., Chen, C.-F., et al. (2019) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2562110 · Cited by 1,454 · see citing works
Whither the Future of Controlling Quantum Phenomena?
RABITZ, H. A., de Vivie‐Riedle, R., Motzkus, M., & Kompa, K. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.824 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
About the Pauli exclusion principle
Jordán, P., & Wigner, E. P. (1928) · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future
Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R., & Rabitz, H. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits
Debnath, S., Linke, N. M., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Wright, K., & Monroe, C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18648 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices
Moll, N., Barkoutsos, P., Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Cross, A., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S., Fuhrer, A., Gambetta, J. M., Ganzhorn, M., et al. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aab822 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting
Herek, J. L., Wohlleben, W., Cogdell, R. J., Zeidler, D., & Motzkus, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417533a · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system
Gambetta, J., Chow, J. M., & Steffen, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and futurePreprint
Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R., & RABITZ, H. A. (2010) · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Introduction to the Theory of Computation
Ina, I., Rachel, & Aarón (2013) · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2011.552441 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Computation of Molecular Spectra on a Quantum Processor with an Error-Resilient Algorithm
Colless, J. I., Ramasesh, V. V., Dahlen, D., Blok, M. S., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., McClean, J. R., Carter, J., de Jong, W. A., & Siddiqi, I. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011021 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Rapidly convergent iteration methods for quantum optimal control of population
Zhu, W., Botina, J., & RABITZ, H. A. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.475576 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics
Blais, A., Girvin, S. M., & Oliver, W. D. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0806-z · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Chopped random-basis quantum optimization
Caneva, T., Calarco, T., & Montangero, S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.022326 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Simulating physical phenomena by quantum networks
Somma, R. D., Ortíz, G., Gubernatis, J. E., Knill, E. H., & Laflamme, R. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042323 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Coherent Laser Control of the Product Distribution Obtained in the Photoexcitation of HI
Zhu, L., Kleiman, V. D., Li, X., Lu, S. P., Trentelman, K. A., & Gordon, R. J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5233.77 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Quantum implementation of the unitary coupled cluster for simulating molecular electronic structure
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, J.-N., Yung, M., & Kim, K. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.020501 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Quantum Optimal Control
Li, J., Yang, X., Peng, X., & Sun, C.-P. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.150503 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Evolutionary algorithms and their application to optimal control studies
Zeidler, D., Frey, S., Kompa, K. L., & Motzkus, M. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.023420 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Simulation of Electronic Structure Hamiltonians Using Quantum Computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2011) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Higher order decompositions of ordered operator exponentials
Wiebe, N., Berry, D., Høyer, P., & Sanders, B. C. (2010) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/6/065203 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Feedback Control of a Solid-State Qubit Using High-Fidelity Projective Measurement
Ristè, D., Bultink, C. C., Lehnert, K. W., & DiCarlo, L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.240502 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Tunable, Flexible, and Efficient Optimization of Control Pulses for Practical Qubits
Machnes, S., Assémat, E., Tannor, D. J., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.150401 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Sawaya, N. P. D., Menke, T., Kyaw, T. H., Johri, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Guerreschi, G. G. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Rach, N., Müller, M. M., Calarco, T., & Montangero, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062343 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Average fidelity between random quantum states
Życzkowski, K., & Sommers, H.-J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032313 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Larus, J., Switzerland, A. '. A. S. F. P. L. A. O. S. 2. L., Association for Computing Machinery-Digital Library, ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture, ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems, ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems, ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages, & SIGs, A. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3373376 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Digital quantum simulation of molecular vibrations
McArdle, S., Mayorov, A., Shan, X., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2019) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc01313j · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Global optimization of quantum dynamics with AlphaZero deep exploration
Dalgaard, M., Motzoi, F., Sørensen, J. J., & Sherson, J. F. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0241-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Evolutionary algorithms for hard quantum control
Zahedinejad, E., Schirmer, S. G., & Sanders, B. C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032310 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Chu, X., & Chu, S. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.021403 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Nonadiabatic Molecular Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Computers
Ollitrault, P. J., Mazzola, G., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.260511 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Klamroth, T. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2185633 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Ekanayake, P., Kooh, M. R. R., Kumara, N. T. R. N., Lim, A., Petra, M. I., Voo, N. Y., & Lim, C. M. (2013) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.094 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
On the design of molecular excitonic circuits for quantum computing: the universal quantum gates
Castellanos, M. A., Dodin, A., & Willard, A. P. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c9cp05625d · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Rapid and robust control of single quantum dots
Accanto, N., de Roque, P. M., Galvan-Sosa, M., Christodoulou, S., Moreels, I., & van Hulst, N. F. (2016) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2016.239 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Quantum optimal control theory for solvated systems
Rosa, M., Gil, G., Corni, S., & Cammi, R. (2019) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5125184 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [19]A. B. Magann, M. D. Grace, H. A. Rabitz, and M. Sarovar, arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12497 (2020). · arXiv
- [22]J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, New Journal of Physics 18 , 023023 (2016), arXiv:1509.04279. · arXiv
- [42]E. Ovrum and M. Hjorth-Jensen, arXiv preprint arXiv:0705.1928 (2007). · arXiv
- [55]M. S. Gordon and M. W. Schmidt, in Theory and applications of computational chemistry (2005) pp. 1167-1189.
- [61]P. Jurcevic, A. Javadi-Abhari, L. S. Bishop, I. Lauer, D. F. Bogorin, M. Brink, L. Capelluto, O. G¨ unl¨ uk, T. Itoko, N. Kanazawa, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08571 (2020). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Koch, C. P., Boscain, U., Calarco, T., Dirr, G., Filipp, S., Glaser, S. J., Kosloff, R., Montangero, S., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Sugny, D., et al. (2022) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00138-x · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Quantum Control
Norambuena, A., Mattheakis, M., Gonzalez, F. J., & Coto, R. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.010801 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pineda, V. G., Valencia-Arías, A., Giraldo, F. E. L., & Ochoa, E. A. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2025.08.002 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Digital quantum simulation of molecular dynamics and control
Magann, A. B., Grace, M., RABITZ, H. A., & Sarovar, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023165 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Lan, J., & Dong, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3390679 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bruschi, M., Gallina, F., & Fresch, B. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03499 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gao, Y., Wang, X., Yu, N., & Wong, B. M. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp02495k · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Quantum computing for classical problems: variational quantum eigensolver for activated processes
Pravatto, P., Castaldo, D., Gallina, F., Fresch, B., Corni, S., & Moro, G. J. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac3ff9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Machine Learning with HQC Architectures using non-Classically Simulable Feature Maps
Farhan, S., Rawat, R., & Moharir, M. (2021) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE) · doi:10.1109/iccike51210.2021.9410753 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Algorithmic Primitives for Quantum-Assisted Quantum Control
Policharla, G.-V., & Vinjanampathy, S. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.220504 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Genetic algorithms for optimal control of a continuous model of a diabetic population
Abdellatif, E. O., Moutaouakil, K. E., Chellak, S., & Hicham, B. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Control, Optimization and Computer Science (ICECOCS) · doi:10.1109/icecocs55148.2022.9983325 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Genetic algorithm applied to fractional optimal control of a diabetic patient
Ouissari, A. E., & Moutaouakil, K. E. (2023) · Ufimskii Matematicheskii Zhurnal · doi:10.13108/2023-15-3-129 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Preparing quantum states by measurement-feedback control with Bayesian optimization
Wu, Y., Yao, J., & Zhang, P. (2023) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-023-1311-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ouissari, A. E., & Moutaouakil, K. E. (2024) · System research and information technologies · doi:10.20535/srit.2308-8893.2024.1.10 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Shiraogawa, T., Dall’Osto, G., Cammi, R., Ehara, M., & Corni, S. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp02870k · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum compiling with a variational instruction set for accurate and fast quantum computing
Lu, Y., Zhou, P.-F., Fei, S.-M., & Ran, S.-J. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.023096 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Quantum logic gate analogies in nonlinear acoustics
Kuk, I., Djordjević, I. B., Gabitov, I. R., Runge, K., Ige, A. S., & Deymier, P. A. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0036901 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Advances in Quantum Computing for Enhancing Network Security and Encryption Techniques
Abdulwahab, H. M. H., Alabdeli, H. M., Singh, S., Pareek, S., Kaur, A., & Dasi, S. (2024) · International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT) · doi:10.1109/icisct64202.2024.10957496 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Boosting RBFNN performance in regression tasks with quantum kernel methods
Zhou, X., Geng, Q., & Jiang, T. (2025) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/add0a3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An applied study of multi-layer decision tree optimization algorithms in machine learning
Nie, J. (2024) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns-2024-0685 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Solving Graph Problems Using Permutation-Invariant Quantum Machine Learning
Mansky, M. B., Rohe, T., Stenzel, G., Sünkel, L., de la Serna, A. B., Castillo, S. L., Sathish, G., Nikolaidou, D., Bondarenko, D., Menzel, L., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00178 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Circuit encapsulation for efficient quantum computing based on controlled many-body dynamicsPreprint
Ran, S.-J., Lu, Y., Zhou, P.-F., & Fei, S.-M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1523679/v1
Quantum optimal control theory for a molecule interacting with a plasmonic nanoparticle
Rosa, M., Dall’Osto, G., Cammi, R., & Corni, S. (2023) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-023-03025-5
Self-citationFast-forwarding molecular ground state preparation with optimal control on analog quantum simulators
Castaldo, D., Rosa, M., & Corni, S. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0204618
Self-citationGeneral Inverse Problem Solution for Two-Level Systems and Its Application to Charge Transfer
Migliore, A., Nakazato, H., Sergi, A., & MESSINA, A. (2024) · Physics · doi:10.3390/physics6030072
A study of multi-model identification and fusion control algorithms for rotary limit devices
Liu, R., Huang, X., & Dai, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · doi:10.1177/09544062241287289
Quantum recurrent neural network for sequential labeling
Pandey, S., Pakray, P., & Zanzotto, F. M. (2026) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-026-02685-6
Sree, S. R., Sandhya, M., Jayanthi, A., Pulipati, V., Rao, D. M. V., & Subrahmanyam, D. V. S. S. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10240-8
MESSINA, A., Nakazato, H., de Castro, A. S. M., Rocha, J. A. M. A., Klimov, A. B., Grimaudo, R., & Migliore, A. (2026) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2026.170605
Klug, S., & Moll, M. (2026) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/aea3a0
- Authors
- Castaldo, D., Rosa, M., & Corni, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2007.00368
- OpenAlex
- W3040573296
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Research Council (ERC-CoG-681285)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum optimal control, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, population transfer, laser pulse shaping, molecular wave functions, quantum circuit encoding, NISQ devices, evolutionary algorithms, quantum simulation, quantum emulators, IBM Q
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review