PreprintCited by 32Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Quantum optimal control with quantum computers: an hybrid algorithm featuring machine learning optimization

Open access
Castaldo, Davide, Rosa, Marta, Corni, Stefano·2020·arXiv

Abstract

We develop an hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to solve an optimal population transfer problem for a molecule subject to a laser pulse. The evolution of the molecular wavefunction under the laser pulse is simulated on a quantum computer, while the optimal pulse is iteratively shaped via a machine learning (evolutionary) algorithm. A method to encode on the quantum computer the n-electrons wavefunction is discussed, the circuits accomplishing its quantum simulation are derived and the scalability in terms of number of operations is discussed. Performance on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices (IBM Q X2) is provided to assess the current technological gap. Furthermore the hybrid algorithm is tested on a quantum emulator to compare performance of the evolutionary algorithm with standard ones. Our results show that such algorithms are able to outperform the optimization with a downhill simplex method and provide performance comparable to more advanced (but quantum-computer unfriendly) algorithms such as Rabitz's.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.00368

Cites

62 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have been implemented for computing quantum optimal control pulses, particularly for controlling molecular systems.

    “Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have also been implemented for computing quantum optimal control pulses, in particular for controlling molecular systems (Castaldo et al. , 2020; Magann et al. , 2020).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Castaldo et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [19]A. B. Magann, M. D. Grace, H. A. Rabitz, and M. Sarovar, arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12497 (2020). · arXiv
  2. [22]J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, New Journal of Physics 18 , 023023 (2016), arXiv:1509.04279. · arXiv
  3. [42]E. Ovrum and M. Hjorth-Jensen, arXiv preprint arXiv:0705.1928 (2007). · arXiv
  4. [55]M. S. Gordon and M. W. Schmidt, in Theory and applications of computational chemistry (2005) pp. 1167-1189.
  5. [61]P. Jurcevic, A. Javadi-Abhari, L. S. Bishop, I. Lauer, D. F. Bogorin, M. Brink, L. Capelluto, O. G¨ unl¨ uk, T. Itoko, N. Kanazawa, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08571 (2020). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castaldo, D., Rosa, M., & Corni, S.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
103
Issue
2
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040573296
Cited by
32
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Research Council (ERC-CoG-681285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
quantum optimal control, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, population transfer, laser pulse shaping, molecular wave functions, quantum circuit encoding, NISQ devices, evolutionary algorithms, quantum simulation, quantum emulators, IBM Q

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review