The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014
Open accessAbstract
This review article contains the 2014 self-consistent set of values of the constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). The CODATA values are based on a least-squares adjustment that that takes into account all data available up to the end of 2014. Details of the data selection and methodology are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-precision measurement of the atomic mass of the electron
Sturm, S., Köhler, F., Zatorski, J., Wagner, A., Harman, Z., Werth, G., Quint, W., Keitel, C. H., & Blaum, K. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13026 · Cited by 326
Ulmer, S., Blaum, K., Kracke, H., Mooser, A., Quint, W., Rodegheri, C. C., & Walz, J. (2013) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.12.071 · Cited by 48
g-factor experiments on simple systems in Penning traps
Blaum, K., Kracke, H., Kreim, S., Mooser, A., Mrozik, C., Quint, W., Rodegheri, C. C., Schabinger, B., Sturm, S., Ulmer, S., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154021 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model
Parker, R. H., Yu, C., Zhong, W., Estey, B., & Müller, H. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap7706 · Cited by 917
Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion
Morel, L., Yao, Z., Cladé, P., & Guellati-Khélifa, S. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2964-7 · Cited by 590
Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network
Boulder Atomic Clock Optical Network (BACON) Collaboration*, Beloy, K., Bodine, M. I., Bothwell, T., Brewer, S. M., Bromley, S. L., Chen, J.-S., Deschênes, J.-D., Diddams, S. A., Fasano, R. J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03253-4 · Cited by 390
The CIPM list of recommended frequency standard values: guidelines and procedures
Riehle, F., Gill, P., Arias, F., & Robertsson, L. (2018) · Metrologia · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aaa302 · Cited by 281
Precision spectroscopy of helium in a magic wavelength optical dipole trap
Rengelink, R. J., van der Werf, Y., Notermans, R. P. M. J. W., Jannin, R., Eikema, K. S. E., Hoogerland, M. D., & Vassen, W. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0242-5 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B., & Taylor, B. N.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-09-26
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W4211153246
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 147.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.88.035009
- The paper
- Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B., & Taylor, B. N. (2016). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.88.035009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
