The DOI matches its Crossref record; 511 of the 511 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 313 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantum computational chemistry
Open accessAbstract
With small quantum computers becoming a reality, first applications are eagerly sought. Quantum chemistry presents a spectrum of computational problems, from relatively easy to classically intractable. Algorithms for the easiest of these have been run on the first quantum computers. But an urgent question is, how well will these algorithms scale to go beyond what is possible classically? This review presents strategies employed to construct quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, with the goal that quantum computers will eventually answer presently inaccessible questions, for example, in transition metal catalysis or important biochemical reactions.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review provides a comprehensive introduction to quantum computational chemistry, bridging classical electronic structure methods and quantum algorithms for chemistry. It focuses on near-term variational algorithms with error mitigation and longer-term quantum phase estimation with error correction, and concludes that fault-tolerant chemistry simulations still require far more resources than current hardware.
Key findings
- Quantum computers can store the full configuration interaction wavefunction of M spin-orbitals using only M qubits in second quantisation, whereas classical FCI scales exponentially; the review identifies strongly correlated systems around 100–200 spin-orbitals as a target “sweet spot” for quantum advantage.
- For fault-tolerant phase estimation, resource estimates cited include FeMo-co (54 electrons, 108 spin-orbitals) requiring ~10^14 T gates and ~200 million physical qubits, running weeks/months; a later qubitization/low-rank approach for 113 electrons in 152 spin-orbitals reduced this to ~10^11 Toffoli gates and ~1 million physical qubits for 2 months.
- Condensed-phase/Fermi-Hubbard estimates are lower: ~2×10^8 T gates for a 128 spin-orbital 3D homogeneous electron gas and ~7.1×10^8 T gates for a 100-site 2D Fermi-Hubbard model, corresponding to ~2–3 million qubits for tens of hours; another Trotter estimate gives ~10^6 Toffoli and 10^7–10^8 T gates and ~400,000–600,000 physical qubits for a couple of hours.
- VQE measurement cost scales as O(M^6/ε^2) in a Gaussian orbital basis and O(M^4/ε^2) in a plane wave dual basis; UCCSD gate counts are O(M^3 N^2) with Jordan-Wigner, improved to O(M^3 N) with swap networks or O(M^3)–O(M^4) with low-rank decomposition.
Methods
- Design: narrative review, not a primary experimental or numerical study; it synthesizes classical computational chemistry (HF, MCSCF, CI, CC, basis sets, active-space reduction) and quantum computing (qubit encodings, Hamiltonian simulation, phase estimation, VQE, error mitigation).
- Data/sample: illustrative worked examples map H2 in STO-3G, 6-31G, and cc-PVDZ bases and LiH in STO-3G onto qubits, using Jordan-Wigner, Bravyi-Kitaev, and BK-tree mappings, natural molecular orbital active-space reduction, symmetry qubit removal, and UCCSD.
- Main analysis: qualitative and asymptotic resource comparisons between classical and quantum methods, with cited gate/qubit estimates for fault-tolerant and near-term algorithms.
Limitations
- The paper states that the field has grown beyond a single review and that it excludes complementary directions such as quantum machine learning for electronic structure, problem-decomposition approaches, hybrid DFT, relativistic quantum chemistry, molecular vibrations, analog simulators, quantum annealers, and non-Hermitian eigenvalue algorithms.
- The paper states that resource estimates depend on assumptions about hardware, error rates, error-correcting code, and fault-tolerance protocols; Trotter error bounds are believed loose by several orders of magnitude, and it is not yet possible to conclusively state which Hamiltonian simulation method will perform best.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no new primary data or experimental results; its numerical resource figures are cited from prior works and are conditional on the stated error-correction and surface-code assumptions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 313 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the cost of storing the wavefunction scales exponentially with the number of electrons, N .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The diagonalised 1-RDM is given by Diag (1.96588, 0.00611, 0.02104, 0.0002, 0.00001, 0.00314, 0.00314, 0.00016, 0.00016, 0.00016).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We can see that the 5 th orbital has a NOON that is 20 times smaller than the next smallest NOON.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We can see that the differences in energy between the three minima are considerably larger than chemical accuracy (1 . 6 mHartree).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which can reproduce the ground state given by Eq. (98).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The exact application of these laws leads to equations much too complicated to be soluble.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dirac, 1929
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“With only single qubit operations and CNOT gates, it is possible to approximate an arbitrary multi-qubit gate to any desired accuracy (DiVincenzo, 1995).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DiVincenzo, 1995
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This leaves classical computers unable to exactly simulate quantum systems in an efficient way.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As quantum computers are able to efficiently simulate quantum systems”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feynman, 1982
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The problem described by Dirac is that the complexity of the wavefunction of a quantum system grows exponentially with the number of particles.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dirac, 1929
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, their ability to guide design is often precluded by the computational complexity of realistic models.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Physical error rates below the surface code threshold of around 1 % (Fowler et al. , 2012b; Stephens, 2014; Wang et al. , 2011) have been achieved for trapped ion (Ballance et al. , 2016; Gaebler et al. , 2016) and superconducting (Arute et al. , 2019; Barends et al. , 2014) qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fowler et al., 2012b
- Not checked yetcites Ballance et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Arute et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, it is important to note that solving the ground state problem for a completely general local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete (quantum Merlin-Arthur complete, the quantum analogue of NP-complete) (Cubitt and Montanaro, 2016; Kempe et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cubitt and Montanaro, 2016
- Not checked yetcites Kempe et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This makes it classically intractable to simulate more than a few particles on a grid using a classical computer.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“If the energy is known to chemical accuracy, then the chemical reaction rate at room temperature can be predicted to within an order of magnitude using the Eyring equation (Evans and Polanyi, 1935; Eyring, 1935)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Evans and Polanyi, 1935
- Not checked yetcites Eyring, 1935
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“While there has been significant experimental progress in understanding the structure of the nitrogenase enzyme over the last 100 years, the reaction mechanism is not yet fully understood (Burgess and Lowe, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Burgess and Lowe, 1996
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The ground state problem can also be tackled using variational algorithms (Peruzzo et al. , 2014), which we will discuss in detail in Sec. V.B.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has also been shown that time evolution of open and closed quantum systems can be simulated using variational approaches (Chen et al. , 2019; Endo et al. , 2018b; Heya et al. , 2019; Li and Benjamin, 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Endo et al., 2018b
- Not checked yetcites Li and Benjamin, 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, with these error rates, we would require around 10 3 -10 4 physical qubits per logical qubit to perform interesting tasks in a fault-tolerant manner (Campbell et al. , 2017; Fowler et al. , 2012a; O'Gorman and Campbell, 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Campbell et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Fowler et al., 2012a
- Not checked yetcites O'Gorman and Campbell, 2017
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This property does not hold for grid based methods.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, these problems are typically artificially constructed examples, rather than real-world problems (Boixo et al. , 2018; Harrow and Montanaro, 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boixo et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Harrow and Montanaro, 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While more complex models are likely required to fully understand the mechanism of cuprate superconductivity, a complete understanding of even the Fermi-Hubbard model is still elusive.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Problems in this complexity class are not believed to be efficiently solvable with either a classical or quantum computer.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A complete analytic or computational understanding of these layers is beyond the capabilities of current classical techniques.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The number of terms in the Hamiltonian scales polynomially with the number of particles for systems of interest in chemistry, due to the two-body nature of the Coulomb interactions between particles (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al., 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, many of these systems show strong correlation, often due to their openshell nature, and spatially degenerate states (Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al., 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finding the low lying energy levels of a quantum Hamiltonian is in general an exponentially difficult problem for classical computers.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This strong correlation often precludes their study in silico , forcing us to carry out expensive, trial-and-error based discovery -especially for transition metal based biological catalysts (Podewitz et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Podewitz et al., 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, models of fermions hopping on a 2D square lattice, such as the one-band Fermi-Hubbard model (Hubbard, 1963), and the related t-J model, appear to reproduce many experimental observations (Anderson, 2002; Lee et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anderson, 2002
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2006
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Mapping out these potential energy curves explicitly is exponentially costly in the degrees of freedom of the molecule, and that there are a variety of methods being developed to solve this difficult problem more efficiently (Christiansen, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Christiansen, 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“To the best of our knowledge, only the work by Berry et al. (2019a) considers a chemical reaction dynamics calculation on a quantum computer using basis set methods.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2019a
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As mentioned in the previous section, mapping out these potential energy surfaces is exponentially costly.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, basis set methods exploit this knowledge to reduce the resources needed to simulate chemical systems.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the electronelectron Coulomb interaction term in Eq. (17) is neglected, we obtain a new Hamiltonian which describes the behaviour of N independent electrons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, a mean-field approximation (the HartreeFock procedure, to be described in Sec. III.C.1) can be used to obtain more suitable molecular orbitals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“MCSCF and CASSCF calculations are among the most effective classical methods at treating systems with strong static correlation (Szalay et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Szalay et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consequently, the eigenstates of the true Hamiltonian can be expressed as linear combinations of these Slater determinants, written as”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
- Not checked yetcites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As first quantised operators conserve the number of electrons, the second quantised operators must contain an equal number of creation and annihilation operators.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Truncated CI calculations also fail to satisfy a related property, known as 'size consistency'.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As they are eigenstates of a Hermitian operator, these Slater determinants form a complete basis of the problem Hilbert space.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“MCSCF can be considered the best approximation to the exact wavefunction for a given number of determinants (Wang et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al. , 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wavefunctions displaying dynamic correlation are often dominated by the Hartree-Fock determinant, and have small additional contributions from a (potentially large) number of excited state determinants.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a result, static correlation often dominates in many systems of scientific interest, such as excited states (Lischka et al. , 2018), or transition metals (Vogiatzis et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lischka et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites Vogiatzis et al. , 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is not possible to perform a complete MCSCF calculation on all possible determinants for systems with more than a few electrons, as the number of determinants scales exponentially with the number of electrons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, as low energy excitations dominate the ground state wavefunction in many physical systems, these truncations can still produce good approximations to the ground state energy (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Szabo and Ostlund, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
- Not checked yetcites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, the Hartree-Fock method provides a poor approximation to the ground state wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Lyakh et al. (2012) note that, while it is sometimes possible to reduce the level of static correlation by manually enforcing correct spin symmetries, and using appropriately localised orbitals, it is in general not possible to avoid strong static correlation when considering the whole of the potential energy surface.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al. (2012)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the expectation values of second quantised operators must be equivalent to the expectation values of the corresponding first quantised operators.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These solutions are exact, provided that the molecular orbitals form a complete basis for the single particle states, and the N -electron wavefunction contains all of the determinants that these molecular orbitals can generate (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Szabo and Ostlund, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
- Not checked yetcites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The method converges slowly to the full configuration interaction wavefunction, as a result of its linear parametrization.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The energy obtained from a truncated CI calculation is not size extensive.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, the Hamiltonian contains up to M 4 terms, depending on the basis functions used.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of strong static correlation can be evidenced by multiple near-degenerate solutions of the Hartree-Fock procedure.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These methods create parametrized trial states, which can then be optimised to approach the ground state (to an accuracy determined by the approximations made).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hamiltonian only contains terms with up to four creation and annihilation operators (two creation, two annihilation) because the Coulomb interaction between the electrons is a two-body interaction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“These basis sets diagonalise the kinetic and potential operators, respectively.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The string of Z operators means that a fermionic operator mapped to qubits generally has a weight of O ( M ) Pauli operators, each acting on a different qubit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, to describe molecular systems, approximately 10 to 100 times as many plane wave basis functions are required as GTOs (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is sometimes the case that certain orbitals are very likely to be either occupied or virtual in all Slater determinants in the wavefunction.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, we are able to remove spin-orbitals from the calculation if their expected occupation number is close to 0 or 1. Our calculation is reduced to including only the most important (ambiguously occupied) orbitals. This is known as performing the calculation in a reduced active space.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Most notably, the wavefunction generated by the canonical CC method does not obey the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Takeshita et al. (2019) showed how to re-integrate some of the energy contribution of the virtual orbitals into a quantum simulation, without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals. Their method utilises an increased number of measurements, and classical post-processing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cc-PV n Z basis sets with higher values of n contain orbitals that better approximate the true atomic orbitals than those with lower n values.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the aforementioned basis sets have a long history of use in classical computational chemistry (and as a result, early work in quantum computational chemistry), they are not necessarily optimal basis sets for calculations performed on quantum computers.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This limitation can be overcome by measuring the ground state energy in several different cc-PV n Z bases, and then extrapolating to the basis set limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, using a quantum computer, we can instead store the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction using only M qubits (Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It has been noted that the BK-tree mapping produces qubit operators with a greater weight than the standard BK mapping (Sung, 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sung, 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This in turn leads to a reduction in the asymptotic scaling of quantum chemistry algorithms to find the ground state energy of molecules and solid state systems”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These mappings typically require more qubits than the JW encoding.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, grid based approaches are typically considered unsuitable for near-term quantum computers, which will have relatively few qubits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that when carrying out a HF calculation in an STOn G basis, the true HF energy (i.e. the energy obtained by performing a HF calculation using a grid based method, on an infinitely precise grid) will not be obtained, as the STOn G basis sets only approximate the true HF orbitals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Applying the BK mapping to a fermionic operator results in a qubit operator with a Pauli weight of O (log 2 M ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, even large ( n = 5) basis sets struggle to exactly represent the true HF orbitals of simple molecules such as N 2 (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we will see in Sec. V, the number of terms in the Hamiltonian plays a key role in the cost of some quantum chemistry algorithms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Phase estimation (Kitaev, 1995) can be used to find the lowest energy eigenstate, | E 0 〉 , and excited states, | E i> 0 〉 , of a physical Hamiltonian (Abrams and Lloyd, 1999).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
- Not checked yetcites Abrams and Lloyd, 1999
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Even more problematically, McClean et al. (2014) showed that phase estimation can become exponentially costly, by considering the imperfect preparation of eigenstates of non-interacting subsystems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Wiebe et al. (2011) showed that the accuracy of such simulations depends on the derivatives of the Hamiltonian (although this dependence may be alleviated by incorporating randomisation procedures (Poulin et al. , 2011)).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wiebe et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Poulin et al., 2011
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in Sec. III.A, the electronic structure Hamiltonian in the canonical molecular orbital basis contains O ( M 4 ) terms, where M is the number of spinorbitals in the molecule.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This has caused second quantised basis set methods to become the de facto option for experimental demonstrations of quantum computational chemistry algorithms, due to the limits of current quantum hardware.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qubitization naturally implements a quantum walk operator with eigenvalues e -i arcsin( E k /α ) where E k is the k th eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian H and α is a normalisation factor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This highlights the necessity of developing state preparation routines which result in at worst a polynomially decreasing overlap with the FCI ground state, as the system size increases.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the number of gates required to implement a fermionic operator will scale as O ( d ) where d is the degree of the graph.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For any Hamiltonian H s , we can prepare a state | Ψ 〉 that is close to its ground state via adiabatic state preparation (Albash and Lidar, 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Albash and Lidar, 2018
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They result in a second quantised Hamiltonian with O ( M 4 ) terms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This low rank decomposition technique was also used by Huggins et al. (2019b), to reduce the number of circuit repetitions required for variational algorithms to find the ground state energy of chemical systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huggins et al. (2019b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note however that if an initial state with sufficiently large overlap with the ground state is available, we may be able to forgo adiabatic state preparation entirely, and instead carry out phase estimation directly on that initial state.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In general, it is difficult to optimally allocate resources between these error budgets in order to minimise the total error (Kivlichan et al. , 2019a; Reiher et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The ultimate limit for the number of calls required to e -iH is π/ϵ PE (for a completely general Hamiltonian, H ), which is approximately obtained using Bayesian approaches (Berry et al. , 2009; Higgins et al. , 2007; Paesani et al. , 2017; Wiebe and Granade, 2016), or entanglement based approaches (Babbush et al. , 2018b).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. , 2009
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al. , 2007
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. , 2018b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice, to achieve accuracy ε , the number of Trotter steps S = O ( t 2 /ε ) should be large in order to suppress the errors in the approximation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The finite precision, ϵ PE , obtained in E 0 is not the only source of error in the algorithm.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For the specific case of a Trotter decomposition of e -iH , Reiher et al. (2017) showed that the error in the energy eigenvalue obtained from phase estimation is upper bounded by ϵ PE + ϵ U + ϵ CS .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order to account for the fact that c 0 < 1, we must multiply the number of repetitions of phase estimation by 1 / | c 0 | 2 , on average, to obtain the ground state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Randomisation procedures (such as randomly ordering the terms in the Trotter sequence, or stochastically choosing which terms to include in the Hamiltonian), have been shown to improve the accuracy obtained using product formulae (Campbell, 2018; Childs et al. , 2018; Ouyang et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Campbell, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Childs et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Ouyang et al., 2019
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A series of improvements throughout these papers reduced the scaling of phase estimation for molecules from O ( M 11 ) (Wecker et al. , 2014) to (empirically) O ( M 5 ) (Babbush et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2015
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is also possible to use higher order product formulae (Berry et al. , 2007; D¨ ur et al. , 2008; Suzuki, 1976), which scale better with respect to the simulation error than the first order method.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Dür et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Suzuki, 1976
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Initialising the qubit register in a state which has a sufficiently large overlap with the target eigenstate (typically the ground state), is a non-trivial problem.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Here, we will describe the method by Bravyi et al. (2017), which utilises two such symmetries: conservation of electron number and spin. This method enables the systematic reduction of two qubits when using the parity, BK (with the caveat that the number of orbitals is a power of two), or BK-tree encoding.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bravyi et al. (2017)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This view is supported by the numerical simulations of Veis and Pittner (2014), who found that annealing times for methylene (CH 2 ) could be reduced by up to four orders of magnitude by using an initial state with larger overlap with the true ground state.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Veis and Pittner, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“One possible method for reducing the annealing time required is to introduce additional 'driving' Hamiltonians, as was numerically investigated by Matsuura et al. (2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matsuura et al., 2018
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The efficiency of adiabatic state preparation depends on the gap between the ground state and the first excited state along the path between H 0 and H s .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are also errors arising from imperfect implementation of the controlled unitary evolutions applied to the main register, which we denote as ϵ U .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A notable feature of these Trotter-based simulations is that rigorous bounds on the Trotter error are believed to be loose by several orders of magnitude, which may impact the scaling of these approaches.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Poulin et al., 2015
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is important, because a randomly chosen state would have an exponentially vanishing probability of collapsing to the desired ground state, as the system size increases.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While the advanced Hamiltonian simulation methods described above are asymptotically more efficient than Trotterization, the Trotter error bounds appear to be loose by several orders of magnitude (Babbush et al. , 2015; Poulin et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Poulin et al., 2015
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The VQE has been experimentally demonstrated on most leading quantum architectures including: superconducting qubits (Colless et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017; O'Malley et al. , 2016), trapped ions (Hempel et al. , 2018; Kokail et al. , 2019; Nam et al. , 2019; Shen et al. , 2017), and photonic systems (Peruzzo et al. , 2014), and shows many desirable features.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Colless et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites O'Malley et al., 2016
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Babbush et al. (2018a) obtained a scaling of O ( N 4 / 3 M 2 / 3 + N 8 / 3 M 1 / 3 ), similar to the scaling of their interaction picture algorithm discussed above.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, alternative methods are required for near-future chemistry simulation.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The scaling of the CI matrix based algorithm of Babbush et al. (2017) was reduced from O ( N 2 M 3 ) in a Gaussian basis to O ( M 2 . 67 ) in a plane wave basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018c
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The canonical UCCSD implementation requires O ( M 3 N 2 ) gates when using the Jordan-Wigner mapping (where M is the number of spin-orbitals, and N is the number of electrons) (Romero et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
In the paper
“A study of spin Hamiltonians (Childs et al. , 2017) found that the asymptotic scaling of Trotter methods was much worse than the qubitization + quantum signal processing, and Taylor series methods.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Childs et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Those authors obtained a scaling of O (( N/h 2 + N 2 ) t ) (excluding logarithmic factors), where h is the grid spacing and t is the simulation time.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, it was later noted that for certain functions f ( H ), qubitization could be used on its own to directly implement the unitary e -if ( H ) t without approximation errors (Berry et al. , 2018; Poulin et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Poulin et al., 2018
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 3D materials, such as diamond, the scaling of Trotter based approaches to phase estimation in a plane wave dual basis was reduced to around O ( M 2 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Those authors obtained a gate scaling of O ( M ) for the Fermi-Hubbard model.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Their approach to finding the ground state required O ( M 3 ) gates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al., 2015b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“When considering an intensive error in the energy, this approach outperforms the Trotter-based method of Kivlichan et al. (2019a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hamiltonian has a sparsity of O ( N 2 M 2 ) in this basis.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, when numerical simulations were performed, Trotter methods required lower gate counts than the other methods.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This was subsequently improved by Kivlichan et al. (2019a), who considered the case where an extensive error in the energy is targeted, and found that the cost of Fermi-Hubbard model simulations was effectively between O (1) and O ( M 1 / 2 ) using Trotterisation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A promising algorithm for near-term quantum hardware is the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), first proposed and experimentally realised by Peruzzo et al. (2014), and elaborated on by McClean et al. (2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peruzzo et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The best product based formulae approaches described above scale as O ( M 1 . 67 N 1 . 83 ) in a plane wave basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018c
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This exchanges the long coherence times needed for phase estimation for a polynomial overhead due to measurement repetitions and classical processing.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Similar results were obtained by Childs and Su (2019), who proved that a k th order product formula can simulate time evolution of an M qubit lattice Hamiltonian using O (( Mt ) 1+ 1 k ) elementary operations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Childs and Su, 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This is known as the Hamiltonian averaging method of calculating the energy (McClean et al. , 2014), and requires O (1 /ϵ 2 ) measurements to determine the energy to a precision ϵ .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2014
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This effect becomes exponentially more prominent as the number of qubits and circuit depth increases.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This produced an algorithm with a scaling of O ( M 1 . 5 λ ), where λ is the 1-norm of the Hamiltonian.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2019b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, these methods are typically assumed to require fault-tolerance.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The methods discussed above require fault-tolerance.
In the paper
“A time dependent form of the Taylor series approach was used for simulation in the 'interaction picture', which enables more efficient time evolution in a plane wave dual basis, scaling as O ( M 2 ) (Low and Wiebe, 2018) (although this algorithm uses O ( M log 2 ( M )) qubits).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Low and Wiebe, 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite this progress, all of the methods discussed above require circuits with a large number of gates.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction, the long gate sequences required by these algorithms make them unsuitable for near-term hardware.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most notably, the coupled cluster (CC) method discussed in Sec. III.C.4 can be extended to produce the unitary coupled cluster (UCC) ansatz (Bartlett et al. , 1989; Hoffmann and Simons, 1988).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bartlett et al., 1989
- Not checked yetcites Hoffmann and Simons, 1988
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Haah et al. (2018) made use of arguments about the speed of information propagation in lattice systems to obtain a simulation algorithm requiring O ( Mt ) gates to simulate time evolution for time t under lattice Hamiltonians.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haah et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that randomly initialised hardware efficient ans¨ atze are not a scalable solution for problems in quantum computational chemistry.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Quantum circuits have been proposed to calculate the analytic gradient of the energy with respect to one of the parameters (Guerreschi and Smelyanskiy, 2017; Mitarai and Fujii, 2018; Schuld et al. , 2019). This avoids the use of finite difference formulae, which restrict the accuracy of gradient evaluation, as the finite difference considered is limited by the noise in the energy evaluation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guerreschi and Smelyanskiy, 2017
- Not checked yetcites Mitarai and Fujii, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Schuld et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, Wecker et al. (2015a) found that around 10 13 samples would be required per energy evaluation for a 112 spin-orbital molecule such as Fe 2 S 2 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al. (2015a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“McClean et al. (2016) and Romero et al. (2019) showed that the number of measurements N m , required to estimate the energy to a precision ϵ , is bounded by”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. (2016)
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al. (2019)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, the LiH molecule in an STO-3G basis naively has around 200 excitation operators to consider. However, taking into account symmetries and a reduced active space, one can achieve accurate results while considering only around 12 excitation operators (Hempel et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hempel et al., 2018
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hamiltonian variational ansatz appears particularly suitable for the Fermi-Hubbard model, which only has O ( M ) terms in its Hamiltonian.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In contrast, canonical gradient descent based methods have struggled to find the ground state, due to the high levels of noise present in current quantum devices (Peruzzo et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Kivlichan et al. (2018) showed that it is possible to implement Trotter steps of the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian with O ( √ M ) depth and O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates on a linear array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2018)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In comparisons of 'out-of-the-box' optimisers (McClean et al. , 2016; Romero et al. , 2019), the NelderMead simplex algorithm utilised in experimental studies was outperformed by both other direct search approaches, and gradient based approaches, such as LBFGS-B.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“or O ( M 3 ) - O ( M 4 ) gates using a low-rank decomposition of the UCCSD tensor (Motta et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Motta et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The efficiency of this ansatz is determined by the number of terms in the Hamiltonian.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“If we are only interested in measuring the energy expectation value, rather than the 1 and 2-RDMs, Huggins et al. (2019b) showed that it is possible to use the low rank Hamiltonian decomposition technique (discussed in Sec. IV.C.2) and orbital basis rotations to divide the Hamiltonian into O ( M ) measurement groups.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huggins et al. (2019b)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This leads to a scaling of approximately O ( M 4 ) when considering a Gaussian molecular orbital basis (Wecker et al. , 2015a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al., 2015a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of parameters in this ansatz scales linearly with the number of Trotter steps, S .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The electronic structure Hamiltonian in a plane wave dual basis only contains O ( M 2 ) terms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All methods were liable to becoming trapped in local minima, even for small systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When taking into account covariances between commuting terms, the total number of measurements required for small molecules was reduced by several orders of magnitude.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice, the gate scaling is typically better than the bounds given above, as many excitations are forbidden by the symmetry point groups of molecular orbitals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“By grouping terms at a fermionic level, rather than a qubit level, Bonet-Monroig et al. (2019) devised a method for measuring the fermionic 2-RDM using O ( M 2 ) circuits (an additional gate depth of O ( M ) is required).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bonet-Monroig et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, these techniques only require a multiplicative overhead in the number of measurements required, if the error rate is sufficiently low.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIn the paper
“The QSE has been experimentally demonstrated, using a two qubit superconducting system to measure the ground and excited state energies of H 2 (Colless et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Colless et al. , 2018
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The latter approach reduces the effect of errors due to state preparation and measurement (Endo et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Endo et al. , 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overlap based methods exploit the orthogonality of energy eigenstates. Once an eigenstate is found, we can find other eigenstates by ensuring that they are orthogonal to the original state (Endo et al. , 2018a; Higgott et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Endo et al., 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Higgott et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The probabilistic error cancellation method introduced by Temme et al. (2017) works by effectively realising the inverse of an error channel, N -1 , such that N -1 ( N ( ρ 0 )) = ρ 0 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Temme et al. (2017)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice, it is not possible to exactly measure all of the possible terms resulting from errors if there are many gates in the circuit.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The original formulation of the QSE used a polynomial number of additional measurements to find the excited states of a quantum system (McClean et al. , 2017a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2017a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probabilistic error cancellation requires full knowledge of the noise model associated with each gate.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown both theoretically (McClean et al. , 2016) and experimentally (O'Malley et al. , 2016) that the VQE can be inherently robust to some coherent errors, such as qubit over-rotation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites O'Malley et al., 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ground state of the updated Hamiltonian H ′ is no longer | E 0 〉 , but the first excited state | E 1 〉 of the original Hamiltonian H .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, small experimental demonstrations of the VQE have shown that noise can still prevent us from reaching the desired levels of accuracy (Hempel et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hempel et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is designed to target the low-lying excited states, which are assumed to differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: Low-lying excited states differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The variance in our estimate of ¯ O 0 is increased by a factor of γ G , where γ is the overhead coefficient, and G is the number of gates in the circuit.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is also possible to mitigate some errors by using symmetry checks on a suitably constructed ansatz state (Bonet-Monroig et al. , 2018; McArdle et al. , 2018c).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bonet-Monroig et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites McArdle et al. , 2018c
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Takeshita et al. (2019) showed how the QSE can be used to recover the energy contribution of virtual orbitals, without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If these errors are not dealt with, they will corrupt the results of our algorithms, rendering the calculations meaningless.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The probabilistic error cancellation method described above has been shown to work for general Markovian noise (Endo et al. , 2017), and has also been extended to work with temporally correlated errors and low frequency noise (Huo and Li, 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Endo et al. , 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The QSE was experimentally demonstrated in a two qubit superconducting system to find the ground and excited states of H 2 (Colless et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Colless et al., 2018
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Barkoutsos et al. (2018) introduced a transformation of the Hamiltonian, such that it only measures the energy of excitations above the Hartree-Fock state (the correlation energy).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barkoutsos et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Exponential extrapolation was introduced by Endo et al. (2017) as a more appropriate extrapolation technique for large quantum circuits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Endo et al. (2017)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The extrapolation method has been demonstrated for VQE experiments in both molecular chemistry (Kandala et al. , 2018; Ollitrault et al. , 2019), and nuclear physics (Shehab et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Ollitrault et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Shehab et al., 2019
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This was confirmed for the case of chemistry calculations by Sawaya et al. (2016), who used numerical simulations to show the impact that noise has on phase estimation based chemistry calculations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sawaya et al. (2016)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A key concern for the VQE is preserving particle number, as states with electron number far from the true value appear to have a larger energy variance than those with smaller particle number errors (Sawaya et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sawaya et al. , 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Ollitrault et al. (2019) showed that the QSE with single and double excitations can be understood as an approximation to the 'equation of motion' (EoM) method for finding excited states, which was originally introduced as a classical method in quantum chemistry by Rowe (1968).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ollitrault et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in Sec. IV.B, quantum computers can store the FCI wavefunction of M spin-orbitals using only M qubits in second quantisation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, many problems of scientific interest fit this description, including: transition metal catalysts (Podewitz et al. , 2011; Vogiatzis et al. , 2019) and the Fermi-Hubbard model (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Podewitz et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Vogiatzis et al. , 2019
- Not checked yetcites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Coupled cluster methods (often CCSD) are some of the most widely used high-accuracy methods. They are applicable to large systems (hundreds of spinorbitals (Bartlett and Musiaglyph[suppress] l, 2007)) which do not display strong static correlation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bartlett and Musiaglyph[suppress] l, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This highlights that working in a suitably large basis set is crucial for obtaining accurate results.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A related extension of the quantum subspace expansion was developed by McClean et al. (2019b), who effectively engineered additional symmetries in the system using an error correcting code.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. (2019b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It was shown by Romero et al. (2019) that all Pauli terms arising from the same excitation operators commute.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al. (2019)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Post-processing the results produces a more accurate expectation value than would be obtained without the mitigation technique.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Otten and Gray, 2018a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This would imply that these problems are among the best targets for quantum computers.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We can see from the above discussion that there appears to be an untreated 'sweet spot', of systems with around 100 to 200 spin-orbitals, that require high accuracy calculations.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“and the ground state of the H 2 molecule at its equilibrium bond distance is given by (Helgaker et al. , 2014)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, Yamazaki et al. (2018) noted that over 95 % of the approved drug molecules in DrugBank 5.0 are larger than these 100-200 spin-orbital systems that we might aim to simulate with a small, error-corrected quantum computer.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yamazaki et al. (2018)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Tubman et al. (2018) presented an algorithm which can prepare a suitable initial state by leveraging a classical adaptive configuration interaction method.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tubman et al. (2018)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This estimate was subsequently reduced through a series of algorithmic optimisations, as described in Sec V.A.4.a.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This enables the use of the plane wave dual basis (Sec. III.D.3), which as discussed in Sec. V.A.4.b can reduce the costs of simulations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Asimilar resource estimation (although using the more accurate FeMo-co active space of Li et al. (2018), with 113 electrons in 152 spin-orbitals) was carried out by Berry et al. (2019b), who used the algorithm based on qubitization and low-rank decompositions of the Hamiltonian, described in Sec. V.A.4.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. (2019b)
- Not checked yetcites Li et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These improvements, combined with the algorithmic advances described throughout this review, have contributed to a significant reduction in the resources required for chemistry calculations, compared to the initial estimates.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“They found that this would require around 10 14 T gates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. , 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“While a complete fault-tolerant resource analysis for this new approach has not yet been performed, those authors showed that the cost of Toffoli gate distillation is equivalent to around 1 million physical qubits, working for 2 months (assuming 10 -3 error rates and surface code cycle times of 1 µ s), at our time of writing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. (2019b)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“They found that simulations of a 100 site Fermi-Hubbard model, and a 128 spin-orbital homogeneous electron gas would both require on the order of 10 6 Toffoli gates and 10 7 -10 8 T gates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This approach reduced the resources required to around 10 11 Toffoli gates (which are currently the bottleneck for this approach).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. (2019b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the length of circuit that we can implement without error correction is heavily limited by noise.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Kivlichan et al. (2019a) also performed resource estimations for condensed matter and solid state problems, using the Trotter based algorithm discussed in Sec. V.A.4.b.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The algorithm investigated in that work (the algorithm of Kassal et al. (2008)) has since been surpassed by the algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kassal et al. (2008)
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subsequent improvements in faulttolerance protocols have further reduced these physical resources (Fowler and Gidney, 2018; Gidney and Fowler, 2019; Litinski, 2019a,b).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fowler and Gidney, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Gidney and Fowler, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Litinski, 2019a,b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This reduced the necessity of having a large overlap with the ground state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, materials in the condensed phase and Fermi-Hubbard simulations so far require considerably fewer resources than simulations of individual molecules.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There has been considerable work to reduce the cost of operations in the surface code (including magic state distillation), which has reduced the overhead of error correction by several orders of magnitude (Fowler and Gidney, 2018; Gidney and Fowler, 2019; Litinski, 2019a,b; Trout and Brown, 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fowler and Gidney, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Gidney and Fowler, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Litinski, 2019a,b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, it is not directly comparable to the methods described above.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It may be many years before we possess a quantum computer with the resources required to implement these algorithms, given the challenges in scaling up hardware and performing quantum error correction (Gambetta et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gambetta et al. , 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and a fully protected logical qubit has not yet been demonstrated.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Kivlichan et al. (2019a) found that if an intensive (e.g. absolute) error in the energy is targeted, then their algorithm was less efficient than the qubitization algorithm of Babbush et al. (2018b).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. (2018b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest that certain calculations with around 100 spin-orbitals may be better suited to early quantum computers than others.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Assuming error rates of 10 -3 , 1 µ s to implement a T gate (including surface code decoding), and 10 µ s feedforward, this led to resources of around 2-3 million qubits, running for tens of hours (using the best fault-tolerance protocols available when that work was completed).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. (2018b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, algorithm complexities are measured in terms of the number of T and/or Toffoli gates that they contain, as these are often the dominant contribution to the cost of the algorithm.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Assuming error rates of 10 -3 , surface code error detection times of 1 µ s, and surface code error decoding times of 10 µ s, they require around 400,000 - 600,000 physical qubits, running for a couple of hours.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Reiher et al. (2017) carried out a fault-tolerant resource estimation for the problem of biological dinitrogen fixation, as described in Sec. III.A.1. Those authors calculated the resources required to perform an FCI calculation on an active space of 54 electrons in 108 spinorbitals for FeMo-co, using a Trotter-based approach to phase estimation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. , 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This stems from the fact that the dominant Slater determinants in the wavefunction typically converge much more quickly than the correlation energy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“This technique can also be combined with that of Berry et al. (2018), which used classically obtained knowledge of the energy eigenvalues to reduce the number of times that phase estimation must be repeated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This algorithm was numerically shown to provide good estimates for the ground states of many systems of interest in chemistry, physics and materials science.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tubman et al. (2018)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As these simulations consider a loose-but-rigorous bound on the energy error (as discussed in Sec. V.A.5), these resource estimates may be overly pessimistic.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these promising results, and recent, rapid improvements, we see that it still requires on the order of 100 , 000 physical qubits to surpass classical techniques.”
- Also stated in: § C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49 · hedged
“As discussed above, existing estimates for surpassing classical calculations require on the order of 100,000 physical qubits, in order to implement quantum error correction.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49 · hedged
In the paper
“This calculation showed improved accuracy over an un-encoded calculation, due to the use of post-selection.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Urbanek et al. (2019)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is comparable to the T gate counts required for phase estimation based approaches described in Sec. VIII.B.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An initial foray into this area was conducted by Urbanek et al. (2019), who experimentally implemented a VQE calculation on the H 2 molecule encoded in the [[4,2,2]] error detecting code.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Urbanek et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our estimate of 40,000 two-qubit gates is approximately equal to the number of gates that we were limited to by noise in our back-of-the-envelope calculation above.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIn the paper
“As an example, the phase estimation based algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2019a) is already only a constant factor less efficient (in terms of T/Toffoli gates) than just implementing time evolution under the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian directly (as is required for a Hamiltonian variational ansatz).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Previous work has shown that the Hamiltonian variational ansatz performs well for the Fermi-Hubbard model, although it is not yet known how many Trotter steps may be required for accurate results.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al. (2015a)
- Not checked yetcites Reiner et al. , 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Reiner et al. , 2018b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Wecker et al. (2015a) achieved good convergence for a 12 site problem with 20 Trotter steps.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al. (2015a)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the hypothetical O ( M 2 ) scaling variational algorithm described above, we may still need around 4 × 10 5 to 4 × 10 6 T gates, neglecting constant factors.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This is a small set of molecules whose energy is known extremely accurately.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pople et al. , 1989
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, even if the number of Trotter steps required to find the ground state scaled only linearly with the number of spin-orbitals, the total algorithm scaling would be O ( M 2 ), which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 130
- Probably not a substantial claim. 148
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total, there are P 3 N × 2 N complex amplitudes, showing that the memory required scales exponentially with the size of the simulated system.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For LiH in the STO-3G basis, we consider { 1 s, 2 s, 2 p x , 2 p y , 2 p z } functions for lithium, and a single { 1 s } orbital for hydrogen. This gives a total of 12 spin-orbitals. We can reduce this problem to one of six qubits, as illustrated in Fig. 12.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lowest energy computational basis state of ccPVDZ H 2 in the Jordan-Wigner encoding (18 qubits) is | 000000001000000001 〉 . The corresponding BK-tree mapped state (16 qubits) is given by | 0001011100010111 〉 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our final Hamiltonian acts on 6 qubits, but differs in energy from the full 12 qubit Hamiltonian by only 0 . 2 mHartree.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reader will find that the 9 th and 18 th orbitals store the number of spin up electrons and total number of electrons, respectively. As a result, they can be removed. This reduces the problem to one of 16 qubits.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 1-RDM in the canonical orbital basis from a CISD calculation on LiH (at an internuclear separation of 1.45 ˙ A) is given by”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The JW mapped HF state (8 qubits) is given by | 00010001 〉 . Using the matrix given above, the BK mapped HF state (8 qubits) is | 00111011 〉 . When the two conserved qubits are removed, the BK mapped HF state (6 qubits) is | 011011 〉 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, most of the prior work in quantum computational chemistry has focused on this problem.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The electronic structure problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we stress that to achieve this ultimate goal we would need considerable further developments - both in the technology required to build such as powerful quantum computer, and the theory behind an appropriate algorithm and model.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite ongoing experimental efforts, no group has yet demonstrated a single fully error corrected qubit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore any multi-qubit observable can be expanded into strings of Pauli operators, the expectation values of which we can measure efficiently with a quantum computer.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Knowledge of the energy eigenstates enables the prediction of reaction rates, location of stable structures, and determination of optical properties (Helgaker et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al., 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite being a relatively young field, quantum computational chemistry has grown extremely rapidly, and has already evolved beyond the stage that it can be fully described by a single review.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, the machinery developed to solve this problem on quantum computers is easily applied to other types of problems, such as finding transition states, or understanding the vibrational structure of molecules.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the gate counts currently estimated for transformative chemistry simulations likely signal the need for quantum error correction, which requires orders of magnitude more qubits, and lower error rates, than are currently available (Babbush et al. , 2018b; Kivlichan et al. , 2019a; Mueck, 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018b
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
- Not checked yetcites Mueck, 2015
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimental developments have accompanied these theoretical milestones, with many groups demonstrating proof of principle chemistry calculations.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, limited by hardware capabilities, these experiments focus only on small chemical systems that we are already able to simulate classically.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Pauli operators and identity matrix, multiplied by real coefficients, form a complete basis for any Hermitian single or multi-qubit operator.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The runtime and physical resources required by these algorithms are expected to scale polynomially with both the size of the system simulated and the accuracy required.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Feynman proposed a solution to this problem; using quantum hardware as the simulation platform”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feynman, 1982
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, the circuit model of quantum computing typically decomposes all algorithms into single and two qubit gates.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, several efficient quantum algorithms have been proposed to solve problems in chemistry.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence, first quantised basis set methods are rarely, if ever, used in classical computational chemistry calculations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The electronic structure problem has received significant attention since it was first introduced in the context of quantum computational chemistry by Aspuru-Guzik et al. (2005), and is widely considered to be one of the first applications of quantum computing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aspuru-Guzik et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, it may be better to treat the nuclei and electrons on an equal footing, which is best achieved with grid based methods.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While classical computational chemistry has made tremendous progress in describing and predicting the properties of a multitude of systems, there are some systems that appear classically intractable to simulate with currently known techniques.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Grid based methods are useful when considering chemical reaction dynamics, or when simulating systems for which the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not appropriate.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we will see in Sec. III.B.2, the information encoded by a Slater determinant can be compressed by moving to the second quantised formalism.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are considered too large to exactly simulate classically, and may thus be capable of solving problems which are intractable on even the largest classical supercomputers (Arute et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Arute et al., 2019
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a variational circuit with set parameters is tailored to the time evolution of one or more specific initial states, in contrast to a Trotter circuit, which can be used to time evolve any valid initial state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Driven by this potential utility, quantum computational chemistry is rapidly emerging as an interdisciplinary field requiring knowledge of both quantum computing and computational chemistry.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
- Rests on an assumption: Quantum computers will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are considered too large to exactly simulate classically, and may thus be capable of solving problems which are intractable on even the largest classical supercomputers (Arute et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Arute et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle, the electronic wavefunction must be antisymmetric under the exchange of any two electrons.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is widely believed that this problem should be efficiently solvable with a quantum computer, for physically relevant systems (Whitfield et al. , 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Whitfield et al., 2013
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the number of spin-orbitals considered, M , is typically larger than the number of electrons in the system, N , the electrons can only occupy N of the spin-orbitals in a given Slater determinant.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, Abrams and Lloyd (1999) showed that the phase estimation algorithm (Kitaev, 1995) can be used to find the energy of a quantum system, and collapse it into the desired energy eigenstate.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abrams and Lloyd, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, building a sufficiently large quantum computer will be a difficult scientific challenge.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that, while it is widely believed to be true, it has not yet been mathematically proven that BPP = BQP (where BPP is the complexity class containing problems that are solvable in polynomial time on a probabilistic classical computer).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if the individual energy values cannot be measured to within chemical accuracy, there is often a fortuitous cancellation of errors, which leads to the energy difference being found to chemical accuracy.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Computational models of FeMo-co have been proposed which are beyond the reach of current classical methods for solving strongly correlated systems (see Sec. VIII.A) but would be accessible with a small error corrected quantum computer (Berry et al. , 2019b; Reiher et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al., 2019b
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al., 2017
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, this is the same regime that is believed to be most relevant to understanding cuprate superconductors (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeBlanc et al., 2015
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, one key difference is that using a basis set is known as a 'Galerkin discretisation', which ensures that the energy converges to the correct value from above, as the number of basis functions tends to infinity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Haber-Bosch process requires high temperatures and pressures, and is believed to consume up to 2 % of the world's energy output (Reiher et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al., 2017
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, to perform accurate simulations of large chemical systems, we will likely require digital quantum simulation, as it is not yet clear how to protect large analog simulations from errors.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, if we consider using a quantum computer to factor numbers in polynomial time (Shor, 1994), current estimates (at time of writing) suggest that we would require around 20 million physical qubits to factor a number that is too large to tackle using known classical algorithms (Gidney and Eker, 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gidney and Eker, 2019
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Size consistency is important for obtaining the correct behaviour from calculations to determine reaction rates, as reactants at the beginning of the process are considered non-interacting.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, first quantised basis set approaches have found use in quantum computational chemistry, as we will discuss in Sec. IV.A.2.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Static correlation can arise because the wavefunction may require several determinants to be coupled in a proper spin configuration, or during bond breaking in order to account for the separation of the electrons onto the products (the latter case is often referred to as non-dynamic, or left-right correlation) (Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The CI method is effective at recovering dynamic correlation, but less effective at recovering static correlation (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As these single-particle molecular orbitals are chosen such that they diagonalise the non-interacting (or mean-field) Hamiltonian, energy eigenstates can be formed by taking tensor products of each electron in a different molecular spin-orbital.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although we will discuss orbital basis sets in more detail in Sec. III.D, we note here that the HF orbitals are not suitable for describing the virtual orbitals that electrons are excited into. This is because the HF method only optimises the occupied orbitals in the single Slater determinant wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Slater determinant generated from a HF calculation is typically taken as the reference state for post-HF methods, such as configuration interaction and coupled cluster, which seek to capture some of the dynamic correlation energy by including additional determinants, describing excitations above the HF state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The MCSCF approach considers a wavefunction with several Slater determinants, and variationally optimises both the molecular orbitals, and the determinant amplitudes simultaneously (Roos et al. , 1980).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roos et al. , 1980
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Systems with strong static correlation are defined as those where multiple Slater determinants are equally dominant.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then assume that each electron moves in the average charge distribution of all of the other electrons, which introduces an effective potential.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These include excited states (Lischka et al. , 2018), transition states (Szalay et al. , 2012), systems at the dissociation limit (Lyakh et al. , 2012), and transition metals (Vogiatzis et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lischka et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites Szalay et al. , 2012
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As considering all determinants is classically intractable, the CI method is typically limited to including a small number of excitations above the reference state: single excitations (CIS), double excitations (CISD), and occasionally triple excitations (CISDT).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For more accurate results, the CCSD(T) method can be used, which treats the triple excitations pertubatively, and scales in time approximately as O ( M 7 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this wavefunction contains a number of determinants which scales exponentially with the number of electrons, making large calculations classically intractable.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To the best of our knowledge, second quantised grid based methods have only been discussed by Babbush et al. (2018c) in their Appendix A.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. (2018c)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order to obey the Pauli exclusion principle, these tensor products must be correctly antisymmetrised.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, while the methods described above are often effective at recovering the static correlation energy, they struggle to recover the dynamic correlation energy.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RayleighRitz variational principle states that the energy expectation value of a parametrized wavefunction is greater than or equal to the lowest energy eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian being measured.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If all ( M N ) determinants are included, the wavefunction is known as the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hartree-Fock (HF) method is a mean-field technique which aims to find the dominant Slater determinant in the system wavefunction. This is achieved by optimising the spatial form of the spin-orbitals to minimise the energy of the wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can be achieved by creating Slater determinants from the molecular orbitals, as described by Eq. (21).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The canonical implementation of CCSD does not store the wavefunction, as this would be exponentially costly (as the CCSD wavefunction has support on all possible Slater determinants). Instead, coupled non-linear equations can be derived. The solution to these equations is the CCSD approximation to the ground state (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Purvis and Bartlett, 1982).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
- Not checked yetcites Purvis and Bartlett, 1982
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that in practice, the molecular orbitals obtained by diagonalising the non-interacting part of the Hamiltonian will likely form a poor basis for the system.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the HF method, we first neglect the Coulomb repulsion term in the electronic structure Hamiltonian (Eq. (17)), reducing the problem to one of N independent electrons.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This Hamiltonian has only O ( M ) terms, where M is the number of spin-sites.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Dynamic correlation is a typically small correction (Hattig et al. , 2012), arising from the Coulomb repulsion between electrons.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hattig et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These two metrics are closely related, and while either can be used, the latter produces more compact basis sets, and hence is used more frequently in practice (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Observables must be independent of the representation used.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as a mean-field solution, the HF method neglects the effects of dynamic and static correlation in the wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The importance of each of the virtual atomic orbitals is determined by their contribution to either the electron density (atomic natural orbitals) or the atomic correlation energy (correlation-consistent basis sets).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Static correlation occurs when more than one Slater determinant is equally dominant in the wavefunction (Hattig et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hattig et al. , 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The coupled cluster (CC) method also includes additional determinants to recover the correlation energy, but uses a product parametrization.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If all determinants are included, we recover the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction, generated by considering all excitations above the Hartree-Fock wavefunction”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The time taken to solve these equations scales as O (( M -N ) 4 N 2 ) (Purvis and Bartlett, 1982), while the memory needed to store the molecular integrals needed scales as O ( M 4 ).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Purvis and Bartlett, 1982
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The configuration interaction (CI) method generates a correlated wavefunction by considering excitations above a reference state, typically the Hartree-Fock state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When all of the excitation operators T i are included, the CC method recovers the full configuration interaction wavefunction - however, performing this calculation would be exponentially costly.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kivlichan et al. (2017) also showed that there exist systems where the grid spacing must decrease exponentially with the number of particles in the system to maintain constant accuracy. Consequently, these systems are not efficient to simulate using this method.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the Schr¨ odinger equation can be solved exactly for one electron atoms, the orbitals obtained become diffuse too rapidly to accurately describe manyelectron atoms, especially close to the nuclei (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These basis sets can be further improved by adding additional orbitals with higher angular momenta, which make the angular part of the wavefunction more flexible. These orbitals are called 'polarisation functions', as they describe the polarisation of atomic charge caused by bonding (for example, the 6-31G* basis).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Additional accuracy can be obtained by using cc-PV n Z basis sets (correlation consistent polarised valence n zeta), introduced by Dunning Jr. (1989). These include additional unoccupied ('virtual') orbitals to recover the correlation energy. The virtual orbitals are generated from correlated calculations on atoms.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dunning Jr. (1989)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As ρ 1 is a Hermitian operator, we can diagonalise it with a unitary transform. This is a basis change from the canonical orbitals to the 'natural molecular orbitals'. The diagonal elements of the basis transformed ρ 1 are called the natural orbital occupation numbers (NOONs).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Spin-orbitals with a NOON close to 0 or 1 (compared to the other NOONs) can be assumed to be empty or occupied, respectively.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using a grid based method, rather than basis sets, means that the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not required. As a result, we are able to treat the electrons and nuclei on an equal footing using grid based methods, which can be important for systems undergoing reactions.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of orbitals considered determines the runtime and memory requirements of classical chemistry algorithms. In the case of quantum computational chemistry, the number of basis functions determines the number of qubits and gate operations required to solve the problem”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The simulation of chemical systems using a grid based method can require considerably more qubits than in basis set approaches. For example, it would require 96 logical qubits to store the position of a single spinless particle to 32 bits of accuracy using a grid based approach. This can be contrasted with basis set approaches, where interesting molecules or Fermi-Hubbard models could be simulated”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This reduces the number of Hamiltonian terms from O ( M 4 ) to O ( M 3 ) in the plane wave basis, and O ( M 2 ) in the plane wave dual basis.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the STO functions exhibit many desirable features, they make evaluating the two-electron integrals in Eq. (28) computationally expensive.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These can be obtained by numerically solving the Schr¨ odinger equation using grid based methods with a very fine grid spacing, which is only possible for small atoms or simple molecules.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the conventional CC method described above is a single determinant reference state method. Consequently, it does not tend to perform well when applied to multireference states, which are required to treat systems with strong static correlation (Lischka et al. , 2018; Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lischka et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These plane wave basis sets are well suited to periodic systems, and have a long history of use in classical density functional theory calculations.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this limitation is compensated by the ease of integral evaluation. Furthermore, the disadvantages of GTOs are less prominent in molecular calculations (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A similar reduction in the number of Hamiltonian terms can be obtained using gausslet basis sets (White, 2017), or 'discontinuous Galerkin' sets (McClean et al. , 2019a), which can both require fewer functions to accurately describe individual molecules than plane wave basis sets.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites White, 2017
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. , 2019a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Calculations using minimal basis sets are of limited accuracy, giving only a qualitative description of the system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Those authors also provide a technique to improve the energy estimate from a calculation by optimising the active space using orbital rotations, as is done in MCSCF calculations (Sec. III.C.2).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The BK-tree mapping is uniquely defined even when the number of orbitals, M , is not a power of 2. As a result, when using the BK-tree mapping we are always able to use the qubit reduction by symmetry technique, which we will discuss in Sec. IV.C. We have observed that it is only possible to use this technique with the standard BK mapping when the number of orbitals is a power of two.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of its product parametrization, the CC method generates a trial wavefunction which includes all possible determinants, albeit with an incorrect parametrization. It therefore provides faster convergence than the configuration interaction method.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the definition above, we can see that the diagonal elements of ρ 1 are the expectation values of the number operator for the corresponding orbitals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“More accurate basis sets can be formed by adding increased radial flexibility to the valence orbitals (the orbitals of the highest occupied energy level), by considering a double-zeta representation of the valence orbitals. This can be achieved using split-valence (Ditchfield et al. , 1971) basis sets, such as the 6-31G basis.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ditchfield et al. , 1971
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in Sec. III.B.2, the full configuration interaction wavefunction contains a number of determinants which scales exponentially with the number of electrons, as roughly O ( M N ). As such, it requires an amount of memory that scales exponentially with the system size.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“STOn G basis sets are often called minimal basis sets, as they contain only the orbitals required to write the Hartree-Fock (HF) state (and those orbitals of similar energy).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hehre et al. , 1969
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This was improved by Berry et al. (2018), who used a circuit with O ( N log c 2 ( N )log 2 ( M )) gates, with a depth of O (log c 2 ( N )log 2 log 2 ( M )), where c ⩾ 1 and depends on the choice of sorting network used, and O ( N log 2 ( N )) ancilla qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berry et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The product parametrization also ensures size extensivity and size consistency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are up to O ( N 2 M 4 ) possible 2-body terms, each leading to up to O (2 2log 2 ( M ) ) Pauli terms - meaning the Hamiltonian can contain up to O ( N 2 M 6 ) Pauli terms, which are up to 2log 2 ( M )-local.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of qubits required to store the wavefunction using the different encoding methods. M is the number of spin-orbitals used in a basis set simulation, N is the number of simulated particles in the problem, and m = log 2 ( P ), where P is the number of grid points per axis for a grid based simulation.”
- Also stated in: § IV. QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY MAPPINGS · p. 20 · plain
“| First quantised, basis sets | N ⌈ log 2 ( M ) ⌉ |”
- Also stated in: § 1. Grid based methods · p. 20 · plain
“As a result, it only requires (3 m + 1) N qubits to store the N electron wavefunction described by Eq. (40).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § IV. QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY MAPPINGS · p. 20 · plain
In the paper
“A thorough comparison of the BK and JW mappings was performed by Tranter et al. (2018) for 86 molecular systems. They found that the BK transform was at least as efficient, in general, as the JW transform when finding the ground states of the molecular systems. In many cases using the BK transform made the calculations considerably more efficient.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tranter et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While these basis sets result in an accurate description of the system with relatively few basis functions, they also lead to Hamiltonians containing up to O ( M 4 ) terms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most common basis sets construct approximate STOs from linear combinations of GTOs. These approximate STOs are used as the basis functions for our atomic orbitals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The core orbitals have a single-zeta representation, while the valence orbitals have an n -zeta representation. The virtual orbitals considered are polarisation functions, with higher angular momenta than the valence orbitals. The polarisation functions are selected by the size of their contribution to the correlation energy.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The original approach, by Abrams and Lloyd (1997), accomplished this using O ( N 2 log 2 2 ( M )) gates and O ( N log 2 ( M )) ancilla qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abrams and Lloyd (1997)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the dependence on r 2 in the exponent, GTOs are more localised than STOs. As a result, GTOs do not approximate the atomic charge distribution as well as STOs, so more are required to describe a given orbital.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, those authors noted that such pathological cases can also exist for basis set methods, but are typically dealt with efficiently using a clever choice of basis function.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to know the size of the gap along the entire adiabatic path a priori , restricts our ability to perform ASP in the minimum amount of time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Verstraete and Cirac (2005) developed a scheme to eliminate the strings of Z operators introduced by the JW transform, resulting in qubit operators with the same locality as the fermionic operators. This is achieved by doubling the number of qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Verstraete and Cirac (2005)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firstly, it is necessary for the register to initially be in a state with a non-zero overlap with the target eigenstate.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There are also errors arising from constructing arbitrary gates from a discrete set of gates - such as approximating single qubit rotations from multiple T and Hadamard gates. These are typically referred to as circuit synthesis errors, ϵ CS , and can be quantified using techniques such as the Solovay-Kitaev theorem (Dawson and Nielsen, 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dawson and Nielsen, 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that most of the work to date in quantum computational chemistry has focused on second quantised basis set methods.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Motta et al. (2018) utilised a low rank decomposition of the Hamiltonian in a Gaussian orbital basis to reduce the cost of time evolution. This decomposition is made possible by the structure present in the molecular Hamiltonian, which arises from the pairwise nature of the electron-electron interactions. Those authors leveraged a doubly factorised Cholesky decomposition of the Hamiltonian, with”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Motta et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To realise the standard phase estimation algorithm given above, we sequentially need to time evolve the main register under the Hamiltonian H for times t 0 = 2 π, t 1 = 4 π, ..., t ω -1 = 2 ω π . The total coherent time evolution, T , is then given by approximately T = 2 ω +1 π .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We remark that while this transformation leaves the ground state of the system unchanged, it does alter the excited states that can be found. In particular, we are restricted to finding those states with an electron number and total s z value equal to the values determined as described above.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: For non-relativistic molecules, the total number of electrons and the total s_z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While first quantised basis set simulations require asymptotically fewer qubits than second quantised basis set simulations, for the smallest simulable systems (such as small molecules in minimal basis sets), second quantised basis set methods require either fewer qubits and/or shorter gate sequences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the JW, parity and BK encoding methods, the number of qubits is equal to the number of spin-orbitals considered, M .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices. As a result, the BKSF transform may require fewer gates than the JW mapping.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.
In the paper
“Using Eq. (61), for a success probability of p = 0 . 5, we require ω = n + 2 ancilla qubits. The total evolution time can be related to the binary precision ϵ PE = 1 / 2 n , to show that T = 8 π/ϵ PE . Given that our success probability for this estimate is p = 0 . 5, we expect to have to repeat the procedure twice to obtain a good estimate of the ground state. This is equivalent to a total of 16”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. , 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed above, both the canonical phase estimation algorithm and adiabatic state preparation require implementation of the time evolution operator, e -iHt , where H may or may not be time dependent.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Reiher et al. (2017) noted that the true scaling may be closer to O ( M 2 / min t ∆( t )).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al., 2017
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that the gate counts of all product formula based methods scale as O (poly(1 /ϵ )).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, we must have a way to coherently implement a unitary operator defined by an efficiently invertible function of the Hamiltonian.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Taylor series and quantum signal processing + qubitization algorithms scale exponentially better with regards to the accuracy of the simulation than product formula based methods.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For the case of a molecular Hamiltonian Reiher et al. (2017) showed that a number of calls scaling as π/ 2 ϵ PE will suffice.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. (2017)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The UCC ansatz is typically truncated at a given excitation level - usually single and double excitations (known as UCCSD).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firstly, the VQE is a heuristic method; it is currently unclear whether the quantum circuits proposed will yield better approximations of the ground state than the classical methods already available.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, the number of measurements required to obtain the energy to the desired accuracy can be large.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The UCC method retains all of the advantages of the CC method, with the added benefits of being fully variational, and able to converge when used with multireference initial states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“McClean et al. (2018) showed that using hardware efficient ans¨ atze with random initial parameters makes the energy gradient essentially zero among most directions of Hilbert space, making classical optimisation extremely difficult.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2018
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The plane wave and plane wave dual basis sets reduce the number of terms in the Hamiltonian to O ( M 3 ) and O ( M 2 ), respectively.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The VQE aims to find the lowest eigenvalue of a given Hamiltonian, such as that of a chemical system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As described in Sec. III.B.2, the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian contains O ( M ) terms, many of which commute with each other.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The VQE is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The VQE relies upon the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This has been improved to O ( M 3 N ) gates, with a depth of O ( M 2 N ) using swap networks (O'Gorman et al. , 2019)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites O'Gorman et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The UCC method is intractable on classical computers, but can be efficiently implemented on a quantum computer.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yung et al. (2014)
- Not checked yetcites Peruzzo et al. (2014)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It appears to be robust against some errors (McClean et al. , 2016; O'Malley et al. , 2016), and capable of finding the ground state energies of small chemical systems using low depth circuits (Kandala et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites O'Malley et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2017
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using the Taylor series method, algorithms were developed which scale as O ( M 5 ) (Babbush et al. , 2016) and O ( N 2 M 3 ) (Babbush et al. , 2017) for molecules in Gaussian basis sets.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Direct search methods (such as Nelder-Mead simplex (Hempel et al. , 2018; Peruzzo et al. , 2014; Shen et al. , 2017), simulated annealing (Hempel et al. , 2018), particle swarm (Colless et al. , 2018; Santagati et al. , 2018) covariance matrix adaptation (Sagastizabal et al. , 2019), and the dividing rectangles algorithm (Kokail et al. , 2019)) were found to exhibit good convergence to the ground”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hempel et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Peruzzo et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Shen et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“McClean et al. (2016) showed that it is important to consider the covariances between Hamiltonian terms within groups, as if these covariances are positive, then it may be better to measure the terms separately.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. (2016)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They reduced the number of gates required to implement a Trotter step of the Hamiltonian to O ( M 2 log 2 ( M )) with increasing molecular size, and O ( M 3 ) for fixed molecular size and increasing basis size.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Motta et al., 2018
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent numerical work has explored the possibility of using classical neural networks to optimise VQE circuits for small instances of the Fermi-Hubbard model (Verdon et al. , 2019; Wilson et al. , 2019). This approach (known as 'meta-learning') works by training the neural networks on many random instances of the system being studied. The networks were able to successfully 'learn' to optimise the”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Verdon et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Wilson et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This leads to a scaling of O ( M 6 /ϵ 2 ) in a Gaussian orbital basis, and O ( M 4 /ϵ 2 ) for a plane wave dual basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c; Cao et al. , 2019; McClean et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Babbush et al., 2018c
- Not checked yetcites Cao et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, we can use classically tractable methods to get initial approximations for the remaining non-zero parameters (O'Malley et al. , 2016; Romero et al. , 2019), which makes the classical optimisation step of the VQE easier.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites O'Malley et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithm, has also been used to successfully find the ground state energy of small molecules, despite relatively large uncertainties due to shot noise, and physical error rates (Ganzhorn et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017, 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ganzhorn et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Kandala et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has also been noted (Kivlichan et al. , 2018) that it is possible to use locality preserving mappings (Jiang et al. , 2018a; Verstraete and Cirac, 2005) to perform Trotter steps in constant depth. However, this comes at a cost of requiring additional qubits, and may have a large constant factor gate overhead.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al., 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Verstraete and Cirac, 2005
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This problem was partly mitigated by using a good initialisation strategy, such as using a chemically motivated (M¨ ollerPlesset) guess for UCC excitation amplitudes (Romero et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Romero et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The approach also demonstrated some resilience to noise included in the simulations (Wilson et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Direct search algorithms are considered more robust to noise than gradient based methods, but may require more function evaluations (Kolda et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kolda et al., 2006
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kivlichan et al. (2018) showed that for Hamiltonians of this form, we can implement Trotter steps in depth O ( M ), using O ( M 2 ) two qubit gates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlichan et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Jiang et al. (2018b) improved this result for the case of a 2D array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity. They showed that it is possible to prepare initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model using O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates, and perform Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian using O ( M ) gates for each Trotter step.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al. (2018b)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A limitation of the majority of these studies is that realistic noise has rarely been considered, so it is still unclear exactly how effective each method may be in practice.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this approach has been questioned by Grimsley et al. (2019) who found that depending on how the operators in the Trotterized UCCSD ansatz are ordered, the optimised energies of systems displaying significant electron correlation can vary by amounts larger than chemical accuracy.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Grimsley et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some authors have also considered using additional unitary transforms to enable more terms to be grouped, reducing the number of groups of terms from O ( M 4 ) to O ( M 3 ) (Crawford et al. , 2019; Gokhale et al. , 2019; Gokhale and Chong, 2019; Jena et al. , 2019; Yen et al. , 2019b; Zhao et al. , 2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Crawford et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Gokhale et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Gokhale and Chong, 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This technique can be generalised to any ansatz with a repeating, layered structure.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The ansatz is composed of S layers.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The extrapolation method (Li and Benjamin, 2017; Temme et al. , 2017) works by intentionally increasing the dominant error rate, ϵ 0 , by a factor λ , and inferring the error free result by extrapolation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Li and Benjamin, 2017
- Not checked yetcites Temme et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that error mitigation schemes are not a scalable solution to the problem of noise in quantum hardware. In order to scale up computations to arbitrarily large sizes, fault-tolerant, error corrected quantum computers are required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, simulated VQE calculations on small molecules were sped up by a factor of 2 to 4 (Barkoutsos et al. , 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barkoutsos et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These contraction VQE methods differ from the overlap based methods, in that they obtain all of the eigenstates at the same time, rather than sequentially. Consequently, all eigenstates should be obtained to a similar accuracy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SWAP test approach requires a circuit that has twice as many gates as the ansatz used (but is of the same depth), and has twice as many qubits.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The probabilistic error cancellation method described above has been shown to work for general Markovian noise (Endo et al. , 2017), and has also been extended to work with temporally correlated errors and low frequency noise (Huo and Li, 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huo and Li, 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because only the correlation energy is calculated, fewer measurements are required and classical optimisation becomes easier.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These techniques are only effective when used with low depth circuits, such that the total error rate in the circuit is low.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The quantum subspace expansion (QSE) method was originally introduced to find excited states (McClean et al. , 2017a), but has proven to be one of the most useful techniques introduced to near-term quantum computational chemistry, with benefits including better ground state estimation (discussed below) and mitigation of hardware errors (discussed in Sec. VI.C).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al., 2017a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The quantum subspace expansion (QSE) (McClean et al. , 2017a) described in Sec. V.C.1 can mitigate errors in the VQE, in addition to calculating the excited energy eigenstates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. , 2017a
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This method is most effective at correcting systematic errors, but can also suppress some stochastic errors.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The probabilistic error cancellation method has been experimentally demonstrated on both superconducting (Song et al. , 2018) and trapped ion (Zhang et al. , 2019) systems.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Song et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al. , 2019
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overhead γ determines the number of additional measurements required to keep the variance of the error mitigated result equal to the variance of the noisy result.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found the EoM method to be robust to noise when demonstrated experimentally, and more accurate for finding excitation energies than the QSE, in numerical tests.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ollitrault et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because realising the inverse channel is in general an unphysical process, we use the scheme depicted in Fig. 9 to effectively realise the inverse channel by focusing only on measurement results.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it may be difficult to find a unitary circuit that simultaneously prepares many eigenstates on an equal footing, which may make these contraction methods difficult to realise in practice.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The latter method appears to be the most powerful of these, requiring a modest additional circuit depth, limited connectivity, and enabling effective post-selection on the electron number and s z value, rather than just the parities of these quantities.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huggins et al. , 2019b
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Otten and Gray (2018b) have also extended the extrapolation method to the scenario where the error rates of different gates are increased by different factors.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Otten and Gray (2018b)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While this method can improve the accuracy of calculations, it requires additional measurements in order to keep the variance of the measured observable the same as the non-extrapolated case.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main drawback of the QSE is the large number of measurements that may be required to obtain the 4-RDM of the system. In general there are O ( M 8 ) elements to measure in the 4-RDM, compared to O ( M 4 ) elements for the Hamiltonian.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in Sec. II.A, physical qubits accumulate errors during computation, due to their interaction with the environment, and our imperfect control.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tensor network methods, such as density matrix renormalisation group (DMRG), have proven effective for dealing with systems displaying strong static correlation. They provide an alternative approach to CASSCF (see Sec. III.C.2) approaches (Knecht et al. , 2016), allowing the treatment of larger active spaces, including those of metalloenzyme complexes with active spaces of over 70 spin-orbitals (K”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kurashige et al. , 2013
- Not checked yetcites Sharma et al. , 2014
- Not checked yetcites Lischka et al. , 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We will see that the resources required are considerably greater than what we currently have available, at time of writing.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, both the generalised Bravyi-Kitaev superfast transform (Setia et al. , 2018), and the majorana loop stabiliser code (Jiang et al. , 2018a) (discussed in Sec. IV.B.3) introduce additional qubits, whose values are constrained by the mappings.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Setia et al. , 2018
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al. , 2018a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the context of condensed matter physics, these calculations are referred to as 'exact diagonalisation' and are possible up to system sizes of around 20 to 30 lattice sites, in the case of Fermi-Hubbard models (Jiang et al. , 2018b; Yamada et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al. , 2018b
- Not checked yetcites Yamada et al. , 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, these techniques can struggle to achieve highly accurate results for strongly correlated systems, and are not systematically improvable.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other methods of error mitigation have been proposed, but require further research in order to assess how they can be best incorporated into chemistry calculations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, we consider this spatial orbital to always be empty, and so remove all terms involving it from the Hamiltonian. This leaves a Hamiltonian acting on M = 18 spin-orbitals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in practice it is not always necessary to perform highly accurate calculations on the entirety of a large molecule or enzyme. Instead, problem decomposition approaches can be utilised”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, Monte Carlo methods are not without their own shortcomings, including the infamous 'sign problem', that affects fermionic simulations (Austin et al. , 2012; Ortiz et al. , 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Austin et al. , 2012
- Not checked yetcites Ortiz et al. , 2001
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hempel et al. (2018) simplified the UCCSD operator for H 2 by implementing the single excitation terms as basis rotations, and combining terms in the double excitation operator”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hempel et al. (2018)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Exact results (albeit with a less accurate model of the system) can also be obtained by carrying out basis set, full configuration interaction (FCI) calculations (Sec. III.B.2), which are less computationally expensive than grid based approaches. However, the cost of these calculations still scales exponentially with the system size, so they are only applicable to small systems, like the dinitrog”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rossi et al. , 1999
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These systems are too strongly correlated to be tackled with methods like HF, DFT or even CCSD. They are also too large to be reliably dealt with using DMRG or quantum Monte Carlo, and much too large for classical FCI methods.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Grid-based simulations (as described in Sec. III.B.1) provide the most accurate results - but can only be carried out for a very small number of particles, because of the large number of grid points required.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first determinant in the ground state wavefunction is the HF state for H 2 , showing that a mean-field solution is a good approximation for this molecule at this interatomic distance.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These calculations are often very efficient to run, and can treat large systems.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We do not expect these calculations to be replaced by those on quantum computers, given the large system sizes that are simulated.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“One such method is the quantum variational error corrector (Johnson et al. , 2017), which uses a variational algorithm to construct noise-tailored quantum memories.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al. , 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Tensor network methods are also useful for treating systems in condensed matter physics, including Fermi-Hubbard models that are accurate to around 100 sites (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, the cost of applying these methods grows with the accuracy of the results that they produce, and the size of the system simulated.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Quantum Monte Carlo has many variants, and has been used to obtain results comparable to FCI in relatively small systems (the Cr 2 molecule with 24 active electrons in 30 spin-orbitals (Tubman et al. , 2016), or the fluorine atom in a cc-PV5Z basis with additional basis functions (Booth and Alavi, 2010)), as well as state of the art results in Fermi-Hubbard systems that are accurate to around 100”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tubman et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Booth and Alavi, 2010
- Not checked yetcites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first orbital has a NOON close to two, and so we consider it to always be doubly occupied. We can then remove any terms containing a † 0 , a 0 , a † 1 , a 1”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By post-processing measurements from multiple iterations, they could detect some errors, or effectively realise a limited form of error correction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McClean et al. (2019b)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, the fourth orbital has a very small NOON. As a result, we assume that this orbital is never occupied, and so remove the two corresponding fermion operators from the Hamiltonian. This leaves a Hamiltonian acting on 8 spin-orbitals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The fourth orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM is never occupied.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we have discussed throughout this review, a small quantum computer, with around 100 perfect qubits, would be able to calculate the FCI energy of a system with around 100 spin-orbitals in polynomial time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Initial work suggested that around 10 18 gates would be necessary to perform phase estimation on a system of around 100 spin-orbitals (excluding the overhead of error correction) (Wecker et al. , 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wecker et al. , 2014
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Another example is individual error reduction (Otten and Gray, 2018a). This method uses error correction to protect a single qubit, while leaving the rest of the physical qubits subject to noise. The process is repeated several times, with each physical qubit being protected in turn.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Otten and Gray, 2018a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While CC methods can also be applied to strongly correlated systems (LeBlanc et al. , 2015; Watson and Chan, 2012), higher excitation degrees are often required, making the method more costly to implement.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
- Not checked yetcites Watson and Chan, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is because these non-Clifford gates cannot be natively implemented in a fault-tolerant way in the surface code, but instead are typically implemented using magic state distillation and teleportation (Bravyi and Kitaev, 2005), which is often expensive (Campbell et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bravyi and Kitaev, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Campbell et al. , 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fault-tolerant resource estimations have since been carried out for two main systems: small transition metal molecules, and condensed phase materials (including 2D Fermi-Hubbard models, 2D and 3D electron gases, and solid materials, such as lithium or diamond).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as described above, the figure of merit for fault-tolerant calculations is often the circuit depth - in particular the number of T or Toffoli gates.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to prove that a given circuit will be able to obtain a good estimate for the ground state, especially when the difficulty of classical optimisation is considered.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The VQE is a heuristic approach, which attempts to generate an approximation to the ground state wavefunction that is better than classical methods, using a short circuit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other works have conducted similar resource estimations for equivalently sized problems (100-200 spinorbitals), but have focused on matter in the condensed phase.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first generations of quantum computers will be significantly smaller than this.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Wenote that those authors were considering a targeted majorana fermion-based quantum computer, with physical error rates 10 3 times lower than has been demonstrated in trapped ion or superconducting qubits, at our time of writing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. , 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While an initial investigation into faulttolerant grid based simulation was performed (Jones et al. , 2012), it did not calculate the total number of T gates required, or the number of qubits, for systems of interest.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jones et al. , 2012
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All resource estimates to date have focused on the 2D surface code, due to its high threshold, and suitability for architectures with a 2D nearest-neighbour connectivity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, the longer the circuit is, the better it can approximate the ground state wavefunction.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Tubman et al. (2018) showed that the cost of this state preparation algorithm is considerably lower than the cost for phase estimation detailed above, and hence, may be neglected for many systems of interest.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tubman et al. (2018)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in Sec. V.B, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) has received significant attention in recent years, due to its short required circuit depth (compared to phase estimation).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the standard model of surface code resource estimation, Clifford gates (such as Pauli gates and the CNOT gate) are considered to be of negligible cost, while non-Clifford gates (such as the T gate, or Toffoli gate) are more costly.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the error mitigation techniques discussed in Sec. VI may enable us to recover accurate results from a circuit deeper than 10,000 gates, it seems unlikely that these methods alone would enable more than a small multiplicative increase in the circuit depth.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Assuming the best physical error rates (10 -3 ) at our time of writing, this would require around 200 million physical qubits, and take on the order of weeks (10 ns to implement a T gate, including surface code decoding) or months (100 ns per T gate) (Reiher et al. , 2017).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiher et al. , 2017
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the resource estimation papers above focus on the cost of phase estimation, and assume that the system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, there have been many improvements in fault-tolerant circuit design and magic state distillation since the work of Jones et al. (2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jones et al. (2012)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the vast majority of these proposals: were tested on small system sizes, performed a limited number of comparisons to other techniques, and were not optimised for maximum efficacy.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We can prepare initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model using O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates, and perform Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian using O ( M ) gates for each Trotter step (Jiang et al. , 2018b).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al. , 2018b
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the realm of variational algorithms, a wide range of ans¨ atze, chemistry mappings, classical optimisation routines, and error mitigation techniques have been proposed in recent years.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we have also shown that quantum methods still face many challenges, not least the high error rates and low qubit counts of existing hardware.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ultimately, the success of quantum computational chemistry will depend on our ability to construct larger and better controlled quantum computers.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This rough estimate neglects constant factors, and so the number of gates required would likely be higher.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This proposal has recently been formalised by McCaskey et al. (2019) and Nam et al. (2019).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McCaskey et al. (2019)
- Not checked yetcites Nam et al. (2019)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further work has shown promising results for both the ground state problem (Reiner et al. , 2018a), and dynamics simulation (Reiner et al. , 2018b), both in the presence of realistic noise rates.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiner et al. , 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Reiner et al. , 2018b
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We cannot expect to surpass classical methods without first reproducing classically known results.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper relies on this without support.
Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
“It is believed that using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum computers will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.
“As quantum computers are able to efficiently simulate quantum systems, it is believed that they will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The electronic structure problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.
“Primarily, this problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Digital quantum simulation is more vulnerable to noise and device imperfections than analog simulation.
“Digital quantum simulation is more vulnerable to noise and device imperfections than analog simulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many systems of commercial and scientific interest, such as catalysts and high temperature superconductors, are strongly correlated.
“Many systems of commercial and scientific interest, such as catalysts and high temperature superconductors, are believed to be strongly correlated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High temperature superconductors are strongly correlated systems.
“High temperature superconductors are also believed to be strongly correlated systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current quantum computers possess only tens of error-prone physical qubits.
“In contrast to the large error corrected machines described above, current quantum computers possess only tens of error-prone physical qubits.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In order to isolate errors arising from the method used, the authors assume they are working in the full molecular orbital basis for the molecule.
“In order to isolate the errors arising from the method used, we assume that we are working in the full molecular orbital basis for our molecule, although in practice this would be classically intractable for large system sizes”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the following section, the authors assume they include all possible determinants that a limited number of molecular orbitals can generate, unless explicitly stated.
“we consider only a limited number of molecular orbitals, but assume that we include all possible determinants that they can generate, unless explicitly stated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Second quantised basis set methods are the most widely used approach in classical computational chemistry and have formed the basis of most work so far in quantum computational chemistry.
“Second quantised basis set methods are the most widely used approach in classical computational chemistry, and have formed the basis of most of the work done so far in quantum computational chemistry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The second quantised grid based method has not yet been used in any classical or quantum computational chemistry algorithms.
“As discussed above, this second quantised grid based method has not yet (to the best of our knowledge) been used in any classical or quantum computational chemistry algorithms.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.
“Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For non-relativistic molecules, the total number of electrons and the total s_z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian.
“For non-relativistic molecules, the total number electrons and the total s z value are conserved.”
“As the electron number and total s z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian, these qubits are only acted on by the identity or Pauli Z operators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is classically intractable to store the required P^{3N} × 2^N = 2^{(3m+1)N} complex amplitudes for large quantum systems.
“While it is classically intractable to store the required P 3 N × 2 N = 2 (3 m +1) N complex amplitudes for large quantum systems, it is possible using a quantum computer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction.
“As near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The methods discussed above require fault-tolerance.
“As a result, these methods are typically assumed to require fault-tolerance.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
“These gate counts assume that a single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator, which has previously been shown to yield accurate results (Barkoutsos et al. , 2018; Romero et al. , 2019).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Low-lying excited states differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.
“This is designed to target the low-lying excited states, which are assumed to differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ansatz is composed of S layers.
“We assume that the ansatz is composed of S layers.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The fourth orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM is never occupied.
“we assume that this orbital is never occupied”
The paper relies on this without support.
When the error rate is low, terms resulting from many errors are negligibly small.
“If the error rate is low, then the other terms can be considered negligibly small.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.
“All of the resource estimation papers above focus on the cost of phase estimation, and assume that the system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and a fully protected logical qubit has not yet been demonstrated.
“Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and we have yet to demonstrate a fully protected logical qubit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of error correcting codes is complicated by the difficulty of producing error protected T gates.
“Nevertheless, the use of error correcting codes is complicated by the difficulty of producing error protected T gates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.
“Moreover, synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For many of the molecules in the G1 set, an FCI calculation on a sufficiently accurate basis set would be classically intractable.
“For many of the molecules in the G1 set, an FCI calculation on a sufficiently accurate basis set would be classically intractable (although they are typically not necessary due to highly accurate approximate methods and experimental results).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, quantum computers can play a crucial role in performing precise simulations for chemical processes and procedures in biological sciences [9, 69-71].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The electronic structure problem is one of the most prominent tasks within VQAs (see for example the reviews (Cao et al. , 2019; McArdle et al. , 2020)) and was the pioneering task for VQE (McClean et al. , 2016; Peruzzo et al. , 2014).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as McArdle et al. , 2020
In the citing paper
“which are currently able to treat up to 50–70 single-particle states depending on the approach and on the features of the system [89]”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“There is a certain consensus that quantum advantage will be realized only on a subset of electronic structure problems [86, 89, 90].”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“These are strongly correlated/multireference systems that are not—and are not projected to be—at reach for classical algorithms”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cites
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,693
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Ditchfield, R., Hehre, W. J., & Pople, J. A. (1971) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1674902 · Cited by 10,612
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Electron correlations in narrow energy bands
Hubbard, J. (1963) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0204 · Cited by 6,687
A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples
Purvis, G. D., & Bartlett, R. J. (1982) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.443164 · Cited by 6,523
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Berry, D. W., 2014, Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’14)
- Berry, D. W., 2015, Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), Berkeley, CA
- 10.5555/2481569.2481570 · DOI
- Coppersmith, D., 1994, IBM
- 10.5555/2685188.2685189 · DOI
- Malik, M. R., 2012, NASA
- 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.013129 · DOI
- 10.5555/2871401.2871402 · DOI
- Shor, P. W., 1994, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Sante Fe
- Shor, P. W., 1996, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Burlington, VT
- 10.5555/2600508.2600515 · DOI
- Yamada, S., 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC ’05), Seattle
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385
Self-citationNoisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Self-citationQuantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J., Degroote, M., Johnson, P., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N., et al. (n.d.) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1,265
Self-citationStrong Quantum Computational Advantage Using a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Wu, Y., Bao, W.-S., Cao, S., Chen, F., Chen, M.-C., Chen, X., Chung, T.-H., Deng, H., Du, Y., Fan, D., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.180501 · Cited by 1,059
An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer
Grimsley, H. R., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 · Cited by 1,033
Metadata
- Authors
- McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-03-30
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2889126882
- Semantic Scholar
- b49ca782a7c16ca66345ccc8c73beabb6bf2ce92
- Cited by
- 1,621
- References
- 415
- Citations by year
- 2026: 197 · 2025: 316 · 2024: 305 · 2023: 273 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 84
- FWCI
- 77.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013243/1)
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Japan Student Services Organization
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- quantum algorithms, quantum chemistry, quantum computing, algorithm design, scalability, transition metal catalysis, biochemical reactions, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review