Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 30 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Arbitrarily negative energy for small Kaluza-Klein bubbles

Open access
Horowitz, Gary T., Lu, Guanyu (Ricky)·2025·Physical Review D

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We show that the energy of a Kaluza-Klein bubble of nothing is unbounded from below even if the size of the circle at infinity and the size of the minimal sphere at the bubble are fixed. We demonstrate this by presenting a family of explicit time-symmetric initial data satisfying these boundary conditions with arbitrarily negative energy. In particular, this is true for very small bubbles, indicating that the standard Kaluza-Klein vacuum is more unstable than previously thought.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper constructs explicit time-symmetric Kaluza-Klein initial data for bubbles of nothing whose ADM energy is unbounded from below even when the asymptotic circle size and the minimal \(S^2\) bubble size are fixed. This suggests the standard Kaluza-Klein vacuum is more unstable than previously thought, while the analogous asymptotically AdS initial data does not show arbitrarily negative energy.

Key findings

  • For a family of Kaluza-Klein bubble initial data with fixed bubble size \(\rho_0\) and fixed asymptotic circle radius \(R\), the ADM energy becomes arbitrarily negative as a parameter \(p\) grows: \(E = -p^3/(2^9 R^2) + O(p^2)\) (Eq. 27).
  • The result holds for very small bubbles, indicating that the standard Kaluza-Klein vacuum is more unstable than previously thought.
  • The construction satisfies the Brill-Pfister bound \(E > -2B\); the paper reports that both \(E\) and \(B\) are \(O(p^3)\) and checks \(E > -2B\) numerically.
  • In the asymptotically AdS analog, the energy does not become arbitrarily negative; for parameters \(R=\ell=G_5=d=1\), \(\rho_0=1/4\), \(C_0=-7/24\), the numerical plot shows the energy remains bounded, consistent with AdS/CFT.

Methods

  • The paper studies time-symmetric initial data with \(SO(3)\times U(1)\) symmetry, metric \(ds^2 = f_1(\rho)d\rho^2 + \rho^2 d\Omega^2 + f_2(\rho)d\phi^2\), with \(f_1=(\alpha\beta)^{-1}\), \(f_2=\alpha\), and solves the Hamiltonian constraint \((4)R=0\) for \(\beta\) given \(\alpha\).
  • It derives a general ADM energy expression (Eq. 13) and chooses an explicit \(\alpha(\rho)=\frac{\rho-\rho_0}{\rho-\rho_0+d}\exp(-p/\rho)\) with \(d>0\), \(p\ge 0\), then analyzes the large-\(p\) limit analytically and uses numerical integration for \(I_2\).
  • For the AdS case, it uses analogous time-symmetric data with negative cosmological constant, derives the energy expression (Eq. 40), and evaluates the integrals numerically for representative parameters.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it does not have the corresponding instantons for the new small zero-energy solutions, that it remains an open question whether any time-symmetric Kaluza-Klein bubble with negative energy always starts out expanding, and that it has no proof that the AdS energy is bounded from below—only trials of other scenarios and functions.
  • The paper notes that in the main Kaluza-Klein example the curvature at the bubble grows exponentially in \(|E|^{1/3}\), so strong quantum gravity corrections may impose a lower bound once curvature exceeds the Planck scale; Appendix B gives another family with only polynomial curvature growth.
  • Evident from the text: the AdS conclusion relies on numerical integration and specific parameter choices rather than an analytic proof, and the main unbounded-energy family has rapidly growing curvature, limiting its direct classical reliability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/xmm8-7kv6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIG. 2 A plot of E and -2 B vs. p 3 , with ρ 0 = R = d = 1.
FIG. 2 A plot of E and -2 B vs. p 3 , with ρ 0 = R = d = 1.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIG. 3 Plots of the integral contributions to the energy, with R = ℓ = d = 1, ρ 0 = 1 / 4.
FIG. 3 Plots of the integral contributions to the energy, with R = ℓ = d = 1, ρ 0 = 1 / 4.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 1 Not valid · 18 Not checked · 54 Own results and interpretations

30 more claims

Create a free account to see all 73 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Metadata

Authors
Horowitz, G. T., & Lu, G. (.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2025-10-28
Volume
112
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W4415634244
Cited by
1
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (PHY-2408110)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
bubble of nothing, negative energy, time-symmetric initial data, compactified extra dimensions, bubble size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.