The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Arsenic Hyperaccumulation in Pteris vittata. Uptake Kinetics, Interactions with Phosphate, and Arsenic Speciation
Open accessAbstract
The mechanisms of arsenic (As) hyperaccumulation inPteris vittata, the first identified As hyperaccumulator, are unknown. We investigated the interactions of arsenate and phosphate on the uptake and distribution of As and phosphorus (P), and As speciation in P. vittata. In an 18-d hydroponic experiment with varying concentrations of arsenate and phosphate, P. vittata accumulated As in the fronds up to 27,000 mg As kg−1 dry weight, and the frond As to root As concentration ratio varied between 1.3 and 6.7. Increasing phosphate supply decreased As uptake markedly, with the effect being greater on root As concentration than on shoot As concentration. Increasing arsenate supply decreased the P concentration in the roots, but not in the fronds. Presence of phosphate in the uptake solution decreased arsenate influx markedly, whereas P starvation for 8 d increased the maximum net influx by 2.5-fold. The rate of arsenite uptake was 10% of that for arsenate in the absence of phosphate. Neither P starvation nor the presence of phosphate affected arsenite uptake. Within 8 h, 50% to 78% of the As taken up was distributed to the fronds, with a higher translocation efficiency for arsenite than for arsenate. In fronds, 49% to 94% of the As was extracted with a phosphate buffer (pH 5.6). Speciation analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy showed that >85% of the extracted As was in the form of arsenite, and the remaining mostly as arsenate. We conclude that arsenate is taken up by P. vittata via the phosphate transporters, reduced to arsenite, and sequestered in the fronds primarily as As(III).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trace Elements in Soils and Plants
Kabata-Pendias, A. (2010) · doi:10.1201/b10158 · Cited by 11,918
Wilde, S. A., Valley, J. W., Peck, W. H., & Graham, C. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051550 · Cited by 1,744
Cited by
Zhao, F.-J., McGrath, S. P., & Meharg, A. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112152 · Cited by 1,246
Self-citationArsenic uptake and metabolism in plants
Zhao, F. J., Ma, J. F., Meharg, A. A., & McGrath, S. P. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02716.x · Cited by 1,185
Self-citationThe biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: implications for the food chain.
Peralta-Videa, J. R., Lopez, M. L., Narayan, M., Saupe, G., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.005 · Cited by 926
Rashid, M. I., Mujawar, L. H., Shahzad, T., Almeelbi, T., Ismail, I. M. I., & Oves, M. (2016) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007 · Cited by 894
Marques, A. P. G. C., Rangel, A. O. S. S., & Castro, P. M. L. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380701798272 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Zhao, F.-J., Meharg, A. A., Raab, A., Feldmann, J., & McGrath, S. P.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1552-1561
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2159839891
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.