The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Polyploidy on Grass Genome Evolution
Abstract
Polyploidy is an evolutionary process whereby two or more genomes are brought together into the same nucleus, usually by hybridization followed by chromosome doubling. As a result, the new polyploid is genetically isolated from its diploid progenitor(s) and a new species is formed. The importance of polyploidy was recognized early in the 20th century and for the past decades many studies have addressed the different categories of polyploids, their mode of formation, their cytogenetic behavior, the ecological implications, the impact of polyploidy on various population genetics aspects such as heterozygosity, mating mode, buffering of mutations, etc. (Stebbins, 1950, 1971). In the past few years, molecular and computational tools have provided new ways to probe the history of genomes, leading to the discovery that polyploidy is even more widespread than previously thought. The once controversial proposal that evolution moves forward through whole genome duplication (Ohno, 1970) is gaining recognition thanks to sequence analysis that is more sensitive than the traditional methods (chromosome counting, analysis of meiotic chromosome pairing, and marker-based mapping) that have been used to assess polyploidy. Accumulating evidence shows that genome duplications occurred in the lineage of all vertebrates (Wolfe, 2001, and refs. therein), including humans (Homo sapiens), whose genome might have been shaped by two rounds of duplication, suggesting octopolyploidy. Recent studies provide strong indications that even yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), with its compact genome, is in fact an ancient tetraploid (Wong et al., 2002). In plants, polyploidy was proposed to have occurred in the lineage of at least 70% of angiosperms (Masterson, 1994) and in 95% of pteridophytes (Grant, 1981). Moreover, the first two species whose genomes have been fully sequenced, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000) and rice (Oryza sativa; Goff et al., 2002), were chosen principally because of their small genome. Therefore, it came as a surprise when sequence analysis revealed that these particular species, considered as classical diploids, are apparently ancient polyploids (paleopolyploids).Paleopolyploids are ancient polyploids which have a disomic inheritance and whose progenitors cannot be identified by cytological tools or DNA markers. Paleopolyploidy is detected by rather sophisticated bioinformatics tools that reveal similarity and colinearity between genes which diverged tens of millions of years ago (see Gaut, 2001 as example). If these minigenome “diploids” are in fact paleopolyploids, then it is reasonable to assume that many more, if not all, higher plant species, considered as diploids because of their genetic and cytogenetic behavior, are ancient polyploids that underwent a process of extensive diploidization. Thus, polyploidy is one of the major processes that has driven and shaped the evolution of higher organisms. The ubiquitous role of genome duplication in evolution is one of the important discoveries from the post-genomic era, explaining the renewed interest in polyploidy. Several reviews have been written recently on polyploidy in plants, covering various aspects such as the impact of polyploidy on speciation, genome structure, and gene expression (Leitch and Bennett, 1997; Comai, 2000;Soltis and Soltis, 2000; Wendel, 2000;Pikaard, 2001). This review will focus mainly on the effect of polyploidy on genome evolution in grasses—a family that has contributed some of the best models to the study of polyploidy. It will review the accumulating evidence of polyploidy as a trigger and/or facilitator for accelerated genome evolution in this family. Overall, we will try to learn from the grasses the causes for the formidable evolutionary success of polyploidy in nature. The grass family, Poaceae (=Gramineae) is one of the largest families of flowering plants, including approximately 10,000 species classified into 600 to 700 genera that diverged from an ancestral progenitor 50 to 70 million years ago (mya; Kellogg, 2001; Huang et al., 2002). As discussed below, most, if not all, grasses are polyploids; all major types of polyploids, namely autopolyploids, segmental allopolyploids, and allopolyploids, can be found in this family. Autopolyploids contain multiple sets (>2) of the same or similar genomes in their nucleus. They originated mostly from intraspecific crosses followed by chromosome doubling because of unreduced gametes and their chromosomes may form multivalents during meiosis and exhibit a multisomic inheritance. One advantage of autopolyploidy is the capacity to maintain high levels of heterozygosity, with multiple alleles per locus, or more rarely, to reach homozygosity with multiple dosage of a given allele. On the other hand, the formation of multivalents during meiosis is often associated with sterility. Therefore, it is not surprising that many autopolyploids are perennial species that also propagate veg
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
A Draft Sequence of the Rice Genome ( Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica )
Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G. K.-S., Li, S., Liu, B., Deng, Y., Dai, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068037 · Cited by 4,208
Chromosomal evolution in higher plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,074
A Draft Sequence of the Rice Genome ( Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica )
Goff, S. A., Ricke, D., Lan, T.-H., Presting, G., Wang, R., Dunn, M., Glazebrook, J., Sessions, A., Oeller, P., Varma, H., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068275 · Cited by 2,838
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Grant, V. (1981) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/gran92318 · Cited by 1,741
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms
Masterson, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · Cited by 1,176
The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids
Soltis, P. S., & Soltis, D. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.13.7051 · Cited by 1,056
The aneuploids of common wheat
Sears, E. R. (1954) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 1,042
The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize
SanMiguel, P., Gaut, B. S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y., & Bennetzen, J. L. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/1695 · Cited by 998
Evolutionary History of the Grasses
Kellogg, E. A. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.125.3.1198 · Cited by 803
Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization
Wolfe, K. H. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35072009 · Cited by 765
Shaked, H., Kashkush, K., Ozkan, H., Feldman, M., & Levy, A. A. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010083 · Cited by 688
Self-citationHuang, S., Sirikhachornkit, A., Su, X., Faris, J., Gill, B., Haselkorn, R., & Gornicki, P. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.072223799 · Cited by 641
Gene Loss, Silencing and Activation in a Newly Synthesized Wheat Allotetraploid
Kashkush, K., Feldman, M., & Levy, A. A. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.4.1651 · Cited by 635
Self-citationLeitch, I. J., & Bennett, M. D. (1997) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(97)01154-0 · Cited by 615
Allopolyploidy-Induced Rapid Genome Evolution in the Wheat (Aegilops–Triticum) Group
Ozkan, H., Levy, A. A., & Feldman, M. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010082 · Cited by 585
Self-citationDNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize
Gaut, B. S., & Doebley, J. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.13.6809 · Cited by 506
Feldman, M., Liu, B., Segal, G., Abbo, S., Levy, A. A., & Vega, J. M. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/147.3.1381 · Cited by 471
Self-citationGENETIC CONTROL OF CHROMOSOME PAIRING IN WHEAT
Sears, E. R. (1976) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000335 · Cited by 447
Genetic and epigenetic interactions in allopolyploid plants
Comai, L. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006480722854 · Cited by 331
Dosage Effects on Gene Expression in a Maize Ploidy Series
Guo, M., Davis, D., & Birchler, J. A. (1996) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/142.4.1349 · Cited by 299
Ogihara, Y., & Tsunewaki, K. (1988) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00265331 · Cited by 198
Baumel, A., Aïnouche, M. L., Николаевич, К. Р., & Schulman, A. H. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004182 · Cited by 192
Polyploidy in Angiosperms: Monocotyledons
Goldblatt, P. (1980) · Polyploidy · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_13 · Cited by 189
Gene order evolution and paleopolyploidy in hemiascomycete yeasts
Wong, S., Butler, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.142101099 · Cited by 143
Molecular Phylogeny of Hybridizing Species from the Genus Spartina Schreb. (Poaceae)
Baumel, A., Aïnouche, M. L., Bayer, R. J., Aïnouche, A., & Misset, M.-T. (2002) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1064 · Cited by 128
THE ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED WHEAT
Jenkins, J. A. (1966) · Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology · doi:10.1139/g66-028 · Cited by 93
Cytosine methylation and nucleolar dominance in cereal hybrids
Houchins, K. E., O’Dell, M. R., Flavell, R. B., & Gustafson, J. P. (1997) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/s004380050500 · Cited by 66
Molecular variation in chloroplast DNA regions in ancestral species of wheat.
Miyashita, N. T., Mori, N., & Tsunewaki, K. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/137.3.883 · Cited by 62
Cited by
The Genomes of Oryza sativa: A History of Duplications
Yu, J., Wang, J., Lin, W., Li, S., Li, H., Zhou, J., Ni, P., Dong, W., Hu, S., Zeng, C., et al. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030038 · Cited by 983
Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x · Cited by 720
Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids
Chen, Z. J., & Ni, Z. (2006) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20374 · Cited by 430
Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization
Wang, X., Shi, X., Hao, B., Ge, S., & Luo, J. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01293.x · Cited by 386
Allopolyploidy – a shaping force in the evolution of wheat genomes
Feldman, M., & Levy, A. A. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000082407 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, A. A., & Feldman, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1587-1593
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2160970573
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 19.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.