The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Only Specific Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Chitinases and [beta]-1,3-Glucanases Exhibit Antifungal Activity
Open accessAbstract
Different isoforms of chitinases and [beta]-1,3-glucanases of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv Samsun NN) were tested for their antifungal activities. The class I, vacuolar chitinase and [beta]-1,3-glucanase isoforms were the most active against Fusarium solani germlings, resulting in lysis of the hyphal tips and in growth inhibition. In additon, we observed that the class I chitinase and [beta]-1,3-glucanase acted synergistically. The class II isoforms of the two hydrolases exhibited no antifungal activity. However, the class II chitinases showed limited growth inhibitory activity in combination with higher amounts of class I [beta]-1,3-glucanase. The class II [beta]-1,3-glucanases showed no inhibitory activity in any combination. In transgenic tobacco plants producing modified forms of either a class I chitinase or a class I [beta]-1,3-glucanase, or both, these proteins were targeted extracellularly. Both modified proteins lack their C-terminal propeptide, which functions as a vacuolar targeting signal. Extracellular targeting had no effect on the specific activities of the chitinase and [beta]-1,3-glucanase enzymes. Furthermore, the extracellular washing fluid (EF) from leaves of transgenic plants expressing either of the secreted class I enzymes exhibited antifungal activity on F. solani germlings in vitro comparable to that of the purified vacuolar class I proteins. Mixing EF fractions from these plants revealed synergism in inhibitory activity against F. solani; the mixed fractions exhibited inhibitory activity similar to that of EF from plants expressing both secreted enzymes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.
Hammond-Kosack, K. E., & Jones, J. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1773 · Cited by 1,752
Pathogenesis-Related Proteins in Plants
(1999) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420049299 · Cited by 666
Small cysteine-rich antifungal proteins from radish: their role in host defense.
Terras, F. R., Eggermont, K., Kovaleva, V, Raikhel, N. V., Osborn, R. W., Kester, A., Rees, S. B., Torrekens, S., Van Leuven, F., & Vanderleyden, J. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.5.573 · Cited by 665
Defense activation and enhanced pathogen tolerance induced by H 2 O 2 in transgenic tobacco
Chamnongpol, S., Willekens, H., Moeder, W., Langebartels, C., Sandermann, H., Van Montagu, M., Inzé, D., & Van Camp, W. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.10.5818 · Cited by 488
Niderman, T., Genetet, I., Bruyere, T., Gees, R., Stintzi, A., Legrand, M., Fritig, B., & Mosinger, E. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.1.17 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Sela-Buurlage, M. B., Ponstein, A. S., Bres-Vloemans, S. A., Melchers, L. S., van den Elzen, P., & Cornelissen, B.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 857-863
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2135870718
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Only Specific Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Chitinases and [beta]-1,3-Glucanases Exhibit Antifungal Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.101.3.857
- The paper
- Sela-Buurlage, M. B., Ponstein, A. S., Bres-Vloemans, S. A., Melchers, L. S., van den Elzen, P., & Cornelissen, B. (1993). Only Specific Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Chitinases and [beta]-1,3-Glucanases Exhibit Antifungal Activity. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.101.3.857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.