Axillary meristem development. Budding relationships between networks controlling flowering, branching, and photoperiod responsiveness
Open accessAbstract
Morphology in many animals is preordained during embryonic development and remains unchanged by environment. In contrast, vast differences in phenotype can occur in plants of identical genotype in different environments. Being sessile organisms, plants must rely on morphological and physiological plasticity to cope with a variable environment. The basis for this ability is the maintenance of numerous pluripotent stem cell clusters called meristems. During embryonic development, plants produce a shoot and a root apical meristem. It is unclear whether axillary meristems are produced de novo in leaf axils or whether they are derived from the apical meristem of the primary shoot (Grbiæ and Bleecker, 2000). Variation in the timing of the initiation and development of axillary mersitems can be observed by comparing the rosette crucifer, Arabidopsis, with the caulescent legume, pea (Pisum sativum). Arabidopsis has delayed axillary meristem initiation, causing some nodes to be devoid of axillary meristems (Grbiæ and Bleecker, 2000). Subsequent development of these meristems may also be delayed such that a pronounced axillary bud is often not observed. Pea develops axillary meristems at most nodes along its stem, and development usually proceeds apparently uninhibited up to the stage of a dormant bud that consists of several undeveloped leaves and internodes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other pathways than SLs influence shoot branching, as SL mutants keep responding to environmental signals such as photoperiod, planting density, or removal of the shoot apex.
“Nevertheless, SL mutants keep responding to environmental signals such as the photoperiod or planting density, or to removal of the shoot apex. Therefore other pathways than SLs’ influence shoot branching”
From Multiple pathways regulate shoot branching (2015) · cites this paper as Beveridge et al., 2003
Cites
<i>MAX1</i> and <i>MAX2</i> control shoot lateral branching in <i>Arabidopsis</i>
Stirnberg, P., van de Sande, K., & Leyser, H. M. O. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.5.1131 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Morris, S. E., Turnbull, C. G. N., Murfet, I. C., & Beveridge, C. A. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.126.3.1205 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationBeveridge, C. A., Symons, G. M., & Turnbull, C. G. N. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.123.2.689 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationExogenous Auxin Effects on Lateral Bud Outgrowth in Decapitated Shoots
CLINE, M. (1996) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0119 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sorefan, K., Booker, J., Haurogné, K., Goussot, M., Bainbridge, K., Foo, E., Chatfield, S., Ward, S., Beveridge, C., Rameau, C., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.256603 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiple pathways regulate shoot branching
Rameau, C., Bertheloot, J., Leduc, N., Andrieu, B., Foucher, F., & Sakr, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00741 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Apical Dominance and Shoot Branching. Divergent Opinions or Divergent Mechanisms?
Dun, E. A., Ferguson, B. J., & Beveridge, C. A. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.086868 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Self-citationAxillary bud outgrowth: sending a message
Beveridge, C. A. (2006) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.11.006 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationPea has its tendrils in branching discoveries spanning a century from auxin to strigolactones
Beveridge, C. A., Dun, E. A., & Rameau, C. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.143909 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Beveridge, C. A., Weller, J. L., Singer, S. R., & Hofer, J. M. I.
- Affiliations
- Australian Research Council (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Carleton College (US)
- John Innes Centre (GB)
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 927-934
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2162475807
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- flowering, branching, plant plasticity, shoot apical meristem, Arabidopsis, Pisum sativum, bud dormancy
- MeSH terms
- Circadian Rhythm, Indoleacetic Acids, Light, Mutation, Plants, Signal Transduction, Arabidopsis, Photoperiod, Meristem, Plant Shoots, Pisum sativum, Flowers, Plant Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review