Cited by 172Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistanceLight effects on plants

Axillary bud outgrowth: sending a message

Beveridge, Christine A·2006·Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Abstract

Mutants that branch profusely in the presence of a growing shoot tip have highlighted the role of graft-transmissible signals that are produced in roots and stem. Orthologous genes in Arabidopsis, pea and petunia are involved in the transmission of a novel long-distance message. These genes show varying degrees of regulation by auxin and an auxin-independent feedback system, and encode enzymes that might act on carotenoid-like substrates. Axillary bud outgrowth is under homeostatic control, involving developmental stages or checkpoints. Perturbation of the long-range messaging and auxin depletion does not guarantee that bud outgrowth will ensue at a particular node.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.11.006

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In pea, grafting revealed the existence of two novel long-distance signals controlling shoot branching that were different from auxin and CK.

    “In pea, grafting revealed the existence of two novel long-distance signals controlling shoot branching that were different from auxin and CK (Beveridge et al., 2000(Beveridge et al., , 2009;;Beveridge, 2006): a root-to-shoot branching inhibitor (Beveridge et al., 1997b;Morris et al., 2001),”
  • Wild type rootstocks can suppress the phenotypes of max1, max31, and max4 biosynthesis mutant scions, indicating that SL or a SL precursor can travel from root to shoot.

    “Grafting studies revealed that wild type rootstocks can suppress the phenotypes of max1, max31, and max4 biosynthesis mutant scions (Sorefan et al., 2003), indicating that SL or a SL precursor can travel from root to shoot (Turnbull et al., 2002; Beveridge, 2006).”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Beveridge, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beveridge, C. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Beveridge, Christine A
Venue
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
ISSN
1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039326297
Cited by
168
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
Keywords
axillary bud outgrowth, long-distance signaling, auxin, shoot tips, homeostatic regulation, developmental checkpoints, Arabidopsis, pea, petunia
MeSH terms
Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Proteins, Plants, Signal Transduction, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review