The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Genomic Approach to Suberin Biosynthesis and Cork Differentiation
Open accessAbstract
Cork (phellem) is a multilayered dead tissue protecting plant mature stems and roots and plant healing tissues from water loss and injuries. Cork cells are made impervious by the deposition of suberin onto cell walls. Although suberin deposition and cork formation are essential for survival of land plants, molecular studies have rarely been conducted on this tissue. Here, we address this question by combining suppression subtractive hybridization together with cDNA microarrays, using as a model the external bark of the cork tree (Quercus suber), from which bottle cork is obtained. A suppression subtractive hybridization library from cork tree bark was prepared containing 236 independent sequences; 69% showed significant homology to database sequences and they corresponded to 135 unique genes. Out of these genes, 43.5% were classified as the main pathways needed for cork biosynthesis. Furthermore, 19% could be related to regulatory functions. To identify genes more specifically required for suberin biosynthesis, cork expressed sequence tags were printed on a microarray and subsequently used to compare cork (phellem) to a non-suberin-producing tissue such as wood (xylem). Based on the results, a list of candidate genes relevant for cork was obtained. This list includes genes for the synthesis, transport, and polymerization of suberin monomers such as components of the fatty acid elongase complexes, ATP-binding cassette transporters, and acyltransferases, among others. Moreover, a number of regulatory genes induced in cork have been identified, including MYB, No-Apical-Meristem, and WRKY transcription factors with putative functions in meristem identity and cork differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Souer, E., van Houwelingen, A., Kloos, D., Mol, J., & Koes, R. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,059
Sun, H., Molday, R. S., & Nathans, J. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.12.8269 · Cited by 353
Blind Homologous R2R3 Myb Genes Control the Pattern of Lateral Meristem Initiation in Arabidopsis
Müller, D., Schmitz, G., & Theres, K. (2006) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.038745 · Cited by 303 · cited 9×
“This gene shows 89% similarity to At1g35720, an Arabidopsis annexin that senses the Ca 2 1 signal elicited by ABA and transmits it downstream in the signaling pathway (Lee et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Li-Beisson, Y., Shorrosh, B., Beisson, F., Andersson, M. X., Arondel, V., Bates, P. D., Baud, S., Bird, D., DeBono, A., Durrett, T. P., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0133 · Cited by 367
Höfer, R., Briesen, I., Beck, M., Pinot, F., Schreiber, L., & Franke, R. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern101 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Soler, M., Serra, O., Molinas, M., Huguet, G., Fluch, S., & Figueras, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-09
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 419-431
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2056447286
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Genomic Approach to Suberin Biosynthesis and Cork Differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.106.094227
- The paper
- Soler, M., Serra, O., Molinas, M., Huguet, G., Fluch, S., & Figueras, M. (2007). A Genomic Approach to Suberin Biosynthesis and Cork Differentiation. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.094227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.