Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms Linking Drought, Hydraulics, Carbon Metabolism, and Vegetation Mortality

Open access
McDowell, Nathan G.·2011·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Events of regional-scale vegetation mortality appear to be increasing in a variety of biomes throughout the Earth and are frequently associated with increased temperatures, droughts, and often (but not always) with outbreaks of biotic agents such as insects and pathogens (for review, see Allen et al., 2010; Supplemental Information S1). The precise physiological mechanisms underlying plant mortality are poorly understood, which limits prediction of where, when, and how vegetation will change with future climatic variation (for review, see Supplemental Information S2). In particular, hypotheses regarding carbon starvation (failure to maintain metabolism or fend off biotic agents due to prolonged negative carbohydrate balance) and hydraulic failure (desiccation from failed water transport) have stimulated recent debate (Adams et al., 2009a, 2009b; Leuzinger et al., 2009; Sala, 2009; McDowell and Sevanto, 2010; Sala et al., 2010). In this Update, I offer a perspective on the mechanisms of drought-induced mortality by providing an integrated view of carbon metabolism in relation to stress and mortality, linking carbon metabolism with new evidence on the role of hydraulic failure in mortality, and identifying associated uncertainties. Drought is the predominant climate characteristic associated with mortality (Allen et al., 2010), but there are parallels with low temperature, light, and paleo-CO2 concentrations, from which I have cautiously drawn evidence regarding mechanisms of drought-induced mortality. Two novel results emerged from this review. First, well-known carbohydrate partitioning patterns are consistent with observations of carbohydrate concentrations in stressed but surviving plants as well as those that are dying, and these results support carbon starvation as a threat to survival during drought. Second, carbon metabolism and hydraulics are coupled via multiple interactions that are only recently becoming appreciated, including an enhanced risk of mortality in species that maintain narrow margins of hydraulic safety. Starve (v): “…to perish or be in process of perishing from lack or insufficiency of food…” (Oxford English Dictionary, 2009). I define the process of carbon starvation as any situation in which carbon supply from photosynthesis and the mobilization of nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) and autophagy (vacuolar proteolysis) is less than carbon use by respiration, growth, and defense. Death is defined as thermodynamic equilibrium between the organism and the environment, in which plants no longer have energy gradients to drive metabolism or regenerate. According to these definitions, measurable NSC need not be zero at death, but any remaining NSC must be unavailable to metabolism (i.e. “accessible carbon exhaustion”; Sala et al., 2010). Drought can put plants on the path to carbon starvation, but they may eventually die of another mechanism. Moreover, there are potential interactions between the path to carbon starvation and (1) utilization of energy stores for metabolism and defense; (2) carbohydrate transport processes, including phloem loading, unloading, and transport; and (3) the demand for energy and carbon skeletons needed to maintain turgor and photosynthesis. The importance of these processes (described below), as well as the widespread observations of elevated NSC in plants during periods of stress (Chapin et al., 1990; Körner 2003; for further review, see Supplemental Information S3), has led to recent debate regarding the mechanisms of carbon starvation or whether it even occurs at all. One interpretation of these observations is that the carbon starvation process is unimportant and water stress induces mortality via hydraulic failure, limiting NSC utilization or predisposing plants to lethal attack by biotic agents (McDowell et al., 2008; Sala et al., 2010). I propose an additional interpretation: water stress impacts on hydraulics, NSC transport, and the use of NSC for metabolism and defense accelerate the process of carbon starvation, which feeds back on further starvation for carbon and associated vulnerability to biotic attack. During water stress, plant growth declines before photosynthesis, resulting in a NSC surplus (Luxmoore et al., 1995; Estiarte and Peñuelas, 1999; Kozlowski and Pallardy, 2002; Hummel et al., 2010, Pinheiro and Chaves, 2011). This NSC surplus results because water stress causes greater reductions in growth than photosynthesis (Supplemental Information S4) and greater reductions in photosynthesis than maintenance respiration (Supplemental Information S5). A modeled representation that summarizes these observations is shown in Figure 1 and described in the Supplemental Data (Amthor and McCree 1990). An important result of this simulation is that carbohydrate content increases early in the drought, but if drought causes significantly reduced photosynthesis for a sufficiently long period, then NSC content will eventually decline, as NSC is consumed for t

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.110.170704

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 1,257

Metadata

Authors
McDowell, N. G.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2011-01-14
Volume
155
Issue
3
Pages
1051-1059
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2116435796
Cited by
1,257
References
71
FWCI
59.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms Linking Drought, Hydraulics, Carbon Metabolism, and Vegetation Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.110.170704
The paper
McDowell, N. G. (2011). Mechanisms Linking Drought, Hydraulics, Carbon Metabolism, and Vegetation Mortality. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.170704

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.