The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci
Open accessAbstract
Nine conifer species with narrow (<5 mm), single-veined leaves were selected for the purpose of examining changes in intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) during drought. Due to the leaf morphology of the study plants, the confounding effects of nonhomogenous photosynthesis common to most reticulate-veined angiosperms were largely avoided, giving a clear picture of ci dynamics under increasing drought. A characteristic biphasic response was observed in all species, with an initial stomatal control phase resulting in a substantial reduction in ci as stomatal conductance (gs) decreased. As gs reached low levels, a strong nonstomatal limitation phase was observed, causing ci to increase as gs approached a minimum. This nonstomatal phase was linked to a concomitant rapid decrease in the fluorescence parameter quantum efficiency, indicating the onset of nonreversible photoinhibition. The ratio of internal to atmospheric CO2 concentration (ci/ca) decreased from values of between 0.68 and 0.57 in undroughted plants to a minimum, (ci/ca)min, which was well defined in each species, ranging from 0.10 in Actinostrobus acuminatus to 0.36 in Acmopyle pancheri. A high correlation was found to exist between (ci/ca)min and leaf water potential measured at (ci/ca)min. Species developing high maximum intrinsic water use efficiencies (low [ci/ca]min), such as A. acuminatus, did so at lower leaf water potentials (-4.5 MPa) than more mesic species (-1.75 MPa for A. pancheri). It is concluded that in the absence of patchy stomatal closure, (ci/ca)min gives a good representation of the drought tolerance of foliage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gunasekera, D., & Berkowitz, G. A. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.2.629 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
FLEXAS, J. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf027 · Cited by 1,645
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
DAMOUR, G., SIMONNEAU, T., COCHARD, H., & URBAN, L. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 710
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701
The effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration on carbon isotope fractionation in C3 land plants
Schubert, B. A., & Jahren, A. H. (2012) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.003 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Brodribb, T.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-05-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-185
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1961259182
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.111.1.179
- The paper
- Brodribb, T. (1996). Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.1.179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.