The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Herbivory in the Previous Generation Primes Plants for Enhanced Insect Resistance
Open accessAbstract
Inducible defenses, which provide enhanced resistance after initial attack, are nearly universal in plants. This defense signaling cascade is mediated by the synthesis, movement, and perception of jasmonic acid and related plant metabolites. To characterize the long-term persistence of plant immunity, we challenged Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with caterpillar herbivory, application of methyl jasmonate, or mechanical damage during vegetative growth and assessed plant resistance in subsequent generations. Here, we show that induced resistance was associated with transgenerational priming of jasmonic acid-dependent defense responses in both species, caused caterpillars to grow up to 50% smaller than on control plants, and persisted for two generations in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis mutants that are deficient in jasmonate perception (coronatine insensitive1) or in the biogenesis of small interfering RNA (dicer-like2 dicer-like3 dicer-like4 and nuclear RNA polymerase d2a nuclear RNA polymerase d2b) do not exhibit inherited resistance. The observation of inherited resistance in both the Brassicaceae and Solanaceae suggests that this trait may be more widely distributed in plants. Epigenetic resistance to herbivory thus represents a phenotypically plastic mechanism for enhanced defense across generations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Species of Small Antisense RNA in Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing in Plants
Hamilton, A. J., & Baulcombe, D. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.950 · Cited by 3,041
Induced Responses to Herbivory
Karban, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (1997) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226424972.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling
Thines, B., Katsir, L., Melotto, M., Niu, Y., Mandaokar, A., Liu, G., Nomura, K., He, S. Y., Howe, G. A., & Browse, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05960 · Cited by 2,520
The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling
Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernández, G., Adie, B., Chico, J. M., Lorenzo, O., García-Casado, G., López-Vidriero, I., Lozano, F. M., Ponce, M. R., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06006 · Cited by 2,432
Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores
Howe, G. A., & Jander, G. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825 · Cited by 2,427
Self-citationCOI1 : An Arabidopsis Gene Required for Jasmonate-Regulated Defense and Fertility
Xie, D.-X., Feys, B. F., James, S., Nieto-Rostro, M., & Turner, J. G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1091 · Cited by 1,655
Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI1–JAZ co-receptor
Sheard, L. B., Tan, X., Mao, H., Withers, J., Ben-Nissan, G., Hinds, T. R., Kobayashi, Y., Hsu, F.-F., Sharon, M., Browse, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09430 · Cited by 1,497
Distinct Roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA Silencing Pathways
Lee, Y. S., Nakahara, K., Pham, J. W., Kim, K., He, Z., Sontheimer, E. J., & Carthew, R. W. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00261-2 · Cited by 1,282
Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants
Chinnusamy, V., & Zhu, J.-K. (2009) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.006 · Cited by 1,162
Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response
Clay, N. K., Adio, A. M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164627 · Cited by 1,098
Self-citation
Cited by
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense
Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 · Cited by 1,524
Mycorrhiza-Induced Resistance and Priming of Plant Defenses
Jung, S. C., Martinez-Medina, A., Lopez-Raez, J. A., & Pozo, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-012-0134-6 · Cited by 1,019
Lämke, J., & Bäurle, I. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6 · Cited by 893
Next-Generation Systemic Acquired Resistance
Luna, E., Bruce, T. J. A., Roberts, M. R., Flors, V., & Ton, J. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.187468 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasmann, S., De Vos, M., Casteel, C. L., Tian, D., Halitschke, R., Sun, J. Y., Agrawal, A. A., Felton, G. W., & Jander, G.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-30
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 854-863
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2131473679
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 33.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herbivory in the Previous Generation Primes Plants for Enhanced Insect Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.111.187831
- The paper
- Rasmann, S., De Vos, M., Casteel, C. L., Tian, D., Halitschke, R., Sun, J. Y., Agrawal, A. A., Felton, G. W., & Jander, G. (2012). Herbivory in the Previous Generation Primes Plants for Enhanced Insect Resistance. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.187831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
